Adams William W, Stewart Jared J, Polutchko Stephanie K, Cohu Christopher M, Muller Onno, Demmig-Adams Barbara
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0334, USA.
Environmental Science and Technology, Colorado Mesa University, Grand Junction, CO 81502, USA.
Plants (Basel). 2023 May 19;12(10):2041. doi: 10.3390/plants12102041.
ecotypes adapted to native habitats with different daylengths, temperatures, and precipitation were grown experimentally under seven combinations of light intensity and leaf temperature to assess their acclimatory phenotypic plasticity in foliar structure and function. There were no differences among ecotypes when plants developed under moderate conditions of 400 µmol photons m s and 25 °C. However, in response to more extreme light or temperature regimes, ecotypes that evolved in habitats with pronounced differences in either the magnitude of changes in daylength or temperature or in precipitation level exhibited pronounced adjustments in photosynthesis and transpiration, as well as anatomical traits supporting these functions. Specifically, when grown under extremes of light intensity (100 versus 1000 µmol photons m s) or temperature (8 °C versus 35 °C), ecotypes from sites with the greatest range of daylengths and temperature over the growing season exhibited the greatest differences in functional and structural features related to photosynthesis (light- and CO-saturated capacity of oxygen evolution, leaf dry mass per area or thickness, phloem cells per minor vein, and water-use efficiency of CO uptake). On the other hand, the ecotype from the habitat with the lowest precipitation showed the greatest plasticity in features related to water transport and loss (vein density, ratio of water to sugar conduits in foliar minor veins, and transpiration rate). Despite these differences, common structure-function relationships existed across all ecotypes and growth conditions, with significant positive, linear correlations (i) between photosynthetic capacity (ranging from 10 to 110 µmol O m s) and leaf dry mass per area (from 10 to 75 g m), leaf thickness (from 170 to 500 µm), and carbohydrate-export infrastructure (from 6 to 14 sieve elements per minor vein, from 2.5 to 8 µm cross-sectional area per sieve element, and from 16 to 82 µm cross-sectional area of sieve elements per minor vein); (ii) between transpiration rate (from 1 to 17 mmol HO m s) and water-transport infrastructure (from 3.5 to 8 tracheary elements per minor vein, from 13.5 to 28 µm cross-sectional area per tracheary element, and from 55 to 200 µm cross-sectional area of tracheary elements per minor vein); (iii) between the ratio of transpirational water loss to CO fixation (from 0.2 to 0.7 mol HO to mmol CO) and the ratio of water to sugar conduits in minor veins (from 0.4 to 1.1 tracheary to sieve elements, from 4 to 6 µm cross-sectional area of tracheary to sieve elements, and from 2 to 6 µm cross-sectional area of tracheary elements to sieve elements per minor vein); (iv) between sugar conduits and sugar-loading cells; and (v) between water conducting and sugar conducting cells. Additionally, the proportion of water conduits to sugar conduits was greater for all ecotypes grown experimentally under warm-to-hot versus cold temperature. Thus, developmental acclimation to the growth environment included ecotype-dependent foliar structural and functional adjustments resulting in multiple common structural and functional relationships.
将适应不同日照长度、温度和降水量的本地生境的生态型,在光照强度和叶片温度的七种组合下进行实验种植,以评估它们在叶片结构和功能方面的适应性表型可塑性。当植物在400 μmol光子·m⁻²·s⁻¹和25°C的适度条件下生长时,各生态型之间没有差异。然而,在应对更极端的光照或温度条件时,那些在日照长度、温度或降水量变化幅度有显著差异的生境中进化而来的生态型,在光合作用和蒸腾作用以及支持这些功能的解剖学特征方面表现出明显的调整。具体而言,当在极端光照强度(100对1000 μmol光子·m⁻²·s⁻¹)或温度(8°C对35°C)下生长时,在生长季节中日照长度和温度范围最大的地点的生态型,在与光合作用相关的功能和结构特征(氧气释放的光饱和与CO₂饱和能力、单位面积叶片干质量或厚度、每条小叶脉中的韧皮部细胞以及CO₂吸收的水分利用效率)上表现出最大差异。另一方面,来自降水量最低的生境的生态型在与水分运输和损失相关的特征(叶脉密度、叶小叶脉中水分与糖分导管的比例以及蒸腾速率)上表现出最大的可塑性。尽管存在这些差异,但在所有生态型和生长条件下都存在共同的结构 - 功能关系,具有显著的正线性相关性:(i)光合能力(范围从10到110 μmol O₂·m⁻²·s⁻¹)与单位面积叶片干质量(从10到75 g·m⁻²)、叶片厚度(从170到500 μm)以及碳水化合物输出基础设施(每条小叶脉6到14个筛管分子、每个筛管分子2.5到8 μm²的横截面积以及每条小叶脉筛管分子16到82 μm²的横截面积)之间;(ii)蒸腾速率(从1到17 mmol H₂O·m⁻²·s⁻¹)与水分运输基础设施(每条小叶脉3.5到8个管状分子、每个管状分子13.5到28 μm²的横截面积以及每条小叶脉管状分子55到200 μm²的横截面积)之间;(iii)蒸腾失水与CO₂固定的比率(从0.2到0.7 mol H₂O到mmol CO₂)与小叶脉中水分与糖分导管的比率(从0.4到1.1个管状分子对筛管分子、管状分子与筛管分子4到6 μm²的横截面积以及每条小叶脉管状分子与筛管分子2到6 μm²的横截面积)之间;(iv)糖分导管与糖分装载细胞之间;以及(v)水分传导细胞与糖分传导细胞之间。此外,对于在温暖至炎热与寒冷温度下实验种植的所有生态型,水分导管与糖分导管的比例更大。因此,对生长环境的发育适应包括依赖生态型的叶片结构和功能调整,从而产生多种共同的结构和功能关系。