• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童、照顾者和社区(C3)共同茁壮成长研究:布鲁克林日落公园基于地点的观察性倡议方案。

The Children, Caregivers, and Community (C3) study of together growing strong: A protocol for an observational, place-based initiative in Sunset Park, Brooklyn.

机构信息

Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America.

Department of Pediatrics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Sep 1;18(9):e0290985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290985. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0290985
PMID:37656726
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10473505/
Abstract

Reaching population-level impact for families in poverty requires moving beyond a sole focus on individuals, to a wider focus on interactions between individuals and their broader environmental contexts. Place-based initiatives have emerged as a policy response to promote community-level change around these broader interactions between individuals and their local communities through addressing long-standing disparities in housing, employment, education, and health. Together Growing Strong (TGS) is one such place-based initiative focused on transforming the health, wellbeing, and development of young children and their families in Sunset Park, Brooklyn. The Children, Caregivers, and Community (C3) Study is an outcomes-based study designed to assess the trajectories of children and families in Sunset Park along indicators such as family health and wellbeing and child development in relation to TGS program participation. The aims, scope, and protocol of the C3 Study are the subjects of this paper.

摘要

要想对贫困家庭产生广泛的影响,就需要超越对个体的单一关注,转而关注个体与更广泛的环境背景之间的相互作用。基于地点的倡议已经成为一种政策回应,旨在通过解决住房、就业、教育和健康方面长期存在的差距,促进社区层面上围绕这些个体与当地社区之间更广泛的相互作用的变革。共同成长(TGS)就是这样一个基于地点的倡议,专注于改变布鲁克林日落公园的幼儿及其家庭的健康、福利和发展。儿童、照顾者和社区(C3)研究是一项基于结果的研究,旨在评估与 TGS 项目参与相关的儿童和家庭的轨迹,指标包括家庭健康和福利以及儿童发展。本文介绍了 C3 研究的目的、范围和方案。

相似文献

1
The Children, Caregivers, and Community (C3) study of together growing strong: A protocol for an observational, place-based initiative in Sunset Park, Brooklyn.儿童、照顾者和社区(C3)共同茁壮成长研究:布鲁克林日落公园基于地点的观察性倡议方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 1;18(9):e0290985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290985. eCollection 2023.
2
The effectiveness of school-based family asthma educational programs on the quality of life and number of asthma exacerbations of children aged five to 18 years diagnosed with asthma: a systematic review protocol.以学校为基础的家庭哮喘教育项目对5至18岁确诊哮喘儿童生活质量和哮喘发作次数的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):69-81. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2335.
3
The Brookline Early Education Project: a 25-year follow-up study of a family-centered early health and development intervention.布鲁克莱恩早期教育项目:一项以家庭为中心的早期健康与发展干预措施的25年随访研究。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jul;116(1):144-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2515.
4
Partnering With Latino/a Caregivers and Community Stakeholders to Understand Priorities and Needs Prior to Implementing an Early Literacy Program.与拉丁裔护理人员和社区利益相关者合作,在实施早期读写计划之前了解优先事项和需求。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Sep 11;32(5):2254-2266. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00005. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
5
From concept to application: the impact of a community-wide intervention to improve the delivery of preventive services to children.从概念到应用:一项全社区干预措施对改善儿童预防性服务提供情况的影响。
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E42. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e42.
6
The care, stimulation and nutrition of children from 0-2 in Malawi-Perspectives from caregivers; "Who's holding the baby?".马拉维 0-2 岁儿童的护理、刺激与营养——来自照顾者的观点;“谁在抱着宝宝?”。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 27;13(6):e0199757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199757. eCollection 2018.
7
Project Redirection: making and measuring a difference.项目转向:创造并衡量影响。
Adv Adolesc Mental Health. 1990;4:137-57.
8
Exploring impacts of multi-year, community-based care programs for orphans and vulnerable children: a case study from Kenya.探索针对孤儿和弱势儿童的多年期社区护理项目的影响:肯尼亚的一个案例研究。
AIDS Care. 2013;25 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S40-5. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.729807.
9
A community-based service enhancement model of training and employing Ear Health Facilitators to address the crisis in ear and hearing health of Aboriginal children in the Northern Territory, the Hearing for Learning Initiative (the HfLI): study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.一项基于社区的服务增强模式,培训和雇佣耳保健促进者,以解决北领地原住民儿童耳和听力健康危机的计划,即学习听力倡议(HfLI):一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jun 16;22(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05215-7.
10
Encouraging Parenting Behaviors That Promote Early Childhood Development Among Caregivers From Low-Income Urban Communities: A Randomized Static Group Comparison Trial of a Primary Care-Based Parenting Program.鼓励低收入城市社区照顾者培养促进幼儿发展的育儿行为:一项基于初级保健的育儿项目的随机静态组比较试验
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Jan;23(1):39-46. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2589-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Concentrated poverty, ambient air pollution, and child cognitive development.集中贫困、环境空气污染与儿童认知发展。
Sci Adv. 2022 Dec 2;8(48):eadd0285. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.add0285. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
2
Neighborhood influences on the development of self-regulation among children of color living in historically disinvested neighborhoods: Moderators and mediating mechanisms.邻里环境对居住在历史上投资不足社区的有色人种儿童自我调节能力发展的影响:调节因素与中介机制
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 26;13:953304. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.953304. eCollection 2022.
3
The intersection of adverse childhood experiences and neighborhood determinants of health: An exploratory spatial analysis.不良儿童经历与健康的邻里决定因素的交集:探索性空间分析。
Psychol Trauma. 2024 Apr;16(Suppl 1):S125-S132. doi: 10.1037/tra0001320. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
4
Reducing Poverty-Related Disparities in Child Development and School Readiness: The Smart Beginnings Tiered Prevention Strategy that Combines Pediatric Primary Care with Home Visiting.减少儿童发展和入学准备方面的贫困相关差距:将儿科初级保健与家访相结合的“聪明开端”分层预防策略。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2021 Dec;24(4):669-683. doi: 10.1007/s10567-021-00366-0. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
5
Measuring Equity From The Start: Disparities In The Health Development Of US Kindergartners.从一开始就衡量公平性:美国幼儿园儿童健康发展的差异
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Oct;39(10):1702-1709. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00920.
6
Closing the Gap: Interventions to Ameliorate Inequities in Early Brain Development and School Performance in Poor Children.缩小差距:改善贫困儿童早期大脑发育和学业表现不平等的干预措施。
J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;221:8-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
7
The Hunger Vital Sign Identifies Household Food Insecurity among Children in Emergency Departments and Primary Care.饥饿生命体征可识别急诊科和初级保健机构中儿童家庭的粮食不安全状况。
Children (Basel). 2019 Oct 2;6(10):107. doi: 10.3390/children6100107.
8
Could nature help children rise out of poverty? Green space and future earnings from a cohort in ten U.S. cities.自然能帮助孩子摆脱贫穷吗?来自美国十个城市的一个队列的绿色空间和未来收益。
Environ Res. 2019 Sep;176:108449. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 May 9.
9
Poverty and Early Childhood Outcomes.贫困与儿童早期发展结果
Pediatrics. 2019 May 20. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3426.
10
The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): Overview of Design and Methodology.妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS):设计与方法概述。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Oct;108(10):1305-1313. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304563. Epub 2018 Aug 23.