Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Centre for Persuasive Communication, Department of Communication Sciences, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Equine Vet J. 2024 May;56(3):535-543. doi: 10.1111/evj.13992. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
Complementary and alternative veterinary medicine (CAVM) is increasingly popular in horses. As CAVM usage could have risks, client-veterinarian communication about CAVM is crucial.
Evaluating equine veterinarians' attitude towards CAVM, their CAVM usage and veterinarian-client communication about CAVM.
Cross-sectional study.
A telephone survey was conducted among equine veterinarians providing ambulatory care on a daily or weekly basis. The first section of the survey included questions about the veterinarians' attitude towards CAVM and their CAVM usage. The second section focused on veterinary-client communication about CAVM.
When herbs are included as CAVM modality, 83% of the participants applied CAVM. Nighty-eight percent had already communicated with horse owners about CAVM and 81% agreed to be open to talk about CAVM. However, 95% agreed that sometimes CAVM usage takes place without disclosure to the veterinarian. The majority of participants communicated about CAVM on a weekly (40%) or daily (22%) basis, most often in person during consultations (99%) or via phone (32%). The median percentage of conversations about CAVM initiated by the owner was 50% (range 50%-80%). When the veterinarian initiated the conversation, this was usually by mentioning it as a treatment option, mostly in addition to conventional treatments. Some participants directly asked about CAVM use in the information-gathering phase.
A convenience sample was used due to lack of data on the number of equine veterinarians in Flanders. Potential favourability bias with higher participation of veterinarians interested in CAVM.
Equine veterinarians generally had a positive attitude towards CAVM use, although this depended on the specific modality. Veterinarian-client communication about CAVM occurs frequently in ambulatory care. An open dialogue with horse owners about CAVM is important to provide information about CAVM and thus enable them to make informed decisions concerning CAVM usage, together with their veterinarian.
补充和替代兽医医学(CAVM)在马匹中越来越受欢迎。由于 CAVM 的使用可能存在风险,因此兽医与客户就 CAVM 进行沟通至关重要。
评估马兽医对 CAVM 的态度、他们对 CAVM 的使用以及兽医与客户就 CAVM 进行的沟通。
横断面研究。
对每天或每周提供门诊护理的马兽医进行电话调查。调查的第一部分包括兽医对 CAVM 的态度和他们对 CAVM 的使用的问题。第二部分侧重于兽医与客户就 CAVM 进行的沟通。
当草药被包括为 CAVM 方式时,83%的参与者应用了 CAVM。88%的兽医已经与马主就 CAVM 进行了沟通,81%的兽医同意开放讨论 CAVM。然而,95%的兽医同意有时 CAVM 的使用是在没有向兽医披露的情况下进行的。大多数参与者每周(40%)或每天(22%)进行 CAVM 的沟通,最常见的是在咨询期间面对面(99%)或通过电话(32%)。主人发起的关于 CAVM 的对话的中位数百分比为 50%(范围 50%-80%)。当兽医发起对话时,通常是将其作为治疗选择提及,主要是除了常规治疗之外。一些参与者在信息收集阶段直接询问 CAVM 的使用情况。
由于缺乏弗拉芒地区马兽医数量的数据,因此使用了方便样本。对 CAVM 感兴趣的兽医的潜在有利偏差,导致更高的参与率。
马兽医普遍对 CAVM 的使用持积极态度,尽管这取决于具体的方式。在门诊护理中,兽医与客户就 CAVM 进行沟通的情况经常发生。与马主进行关于 CAVM 的开放对话对于提供有关 CAVM 的信息很重要,从而使他们能够与他们的兽医一起就 CAVM 的使用做出明智的决定。