Univ. Bordeaux, UR 4139, LabPsy, France.
Univ. Bordeaux, UR 4139, LabPsy, France.
Conscious Cogn. 2023 Oct;115:103569. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103569. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
This study examined whether and how emotional hypnotic suggestions modulate the visual recognition of negative words. We investigated the influence of hypnotic suggestions aimed at modifying emotional reactivity on the arousal effect in negative words. High and low suggestible individuals performed a go/no-go lexical decision task in three intra-individual conditions: with a suggestion to increase emotional reactivity, with a suggestion to decrease emotional reactivity and without hypnotic suggestion. Results showed that hypnotic suggestions modulated the arousal facilitation effect differently depending on the level of suggestibility of the participants. In high suggestible individuals, response times for low-arousal negative words varied oppositely according to the suggestion administered, while no modulations were retrieved for high-arousal ones. In contrast, no suggestion effects were found for low suggestible participants. Altogether, these findings suggest a higher influence of hypnotic suggestions on emotional words that require longer processing times in high suggestible individuals.
本研究旨在探讨情绪性催眠暗示是否以及如何调节对负面词汇的视觉识别。我们考察了旨在改变情绪反应性的催眠暗示对负面词汇唤醒效应的影响。高、低暗示性个体在三种个体内条件下完成了 Go/No-Go 词汇决策任务:一种是增加情绪反应性的暗示,一种是降低情绪反应性的暗示,还有一种是没有催眠暗示的条件。结果表明,催眠暗示对不同暗示性个体的唤醒促进效应的调节作用不同。在高暗示性个体中,低唤醒的负面词汇的反应时间根据所给予的暗示而发生相反的变化,而高唤醒的词汇则没有发生变化。相比之下,低暗示性个体则没有发现暗示效应。总的来说,这些发现表明,在高暗示性个体中,催眠暗示对需要更长处理时间的情绪性词汇的影响更大。