Hwang Charles D, Chegireddy Vishwanath, Remy Katya, Irwin Timothy J, Valerio Ian L, Gfrerer Lisa, Austen William G
From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Mass.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, N.Y.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Sep 1;11(9):e5234. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005234. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Nerve transection with nerve reconstruction is part of the treatment algorithm for patients with refractory pain after greater occipital nerve (GON) and lesser occipital nerve (LON) decompression or during primary decompression when severe nerve injury or neuroma formation is present. Importantly, the residual nerve stump is often best addressed via contemporary nerve reconstruction techniques to avoid recurrent pain. As a primary aim of this study, nerve capping is explored as a potential viable alternative that can be utilized in certain headache cases to mitigate pain.
The technical feasibility of nerve capping after GON/LON transection was evaluated in cadaver dissections and intraoperatively. Patient-reported outcomes in the 3- to 4-month period were compiled from clinic visits. At 1-year follow-up, subjective outcomes and Migraine Headache Index scores were tabulated.
Two patients underwent nerve capping as a treatment for headaches refractory to medical therapy and surgical decompressions with significant improvement to total resolution of pain without postoperative complications. These improvements on pain frequency, intensity, and duration remained stable at a 1-year time point (Migraine Headache Index score reductions of -180 to -205).
Surgeons should be equipped to address the proximal nerve stump to prevent neuroma and neuropathic pain recurrence. Next to known contemporary nerve reconstruction techniques such as targeted muscle reinnervation/regenerative peripheral nerve interface and relocation nerve grafting, nerve capping is another viable method for surgeons to address the proximal nerve stump in settings of GON and LON pain. This option exhibits short operative time, requires only limited dissection, and yields significant clinical improvement in pain symptoms.
对于枕大神经(GON)和枕小神经(LON)减压术后难治性疼痛患者,或在初次减压时存在严重神经损伤或神经瘤形成的患者,神经切断并重建是治疗方案的一部分。重要的是,残余神经残端通常最好通过当代神经重建技术来处理,以避免复发性疼痛。作为本研究的主要目的,探索神经封端作为一种潜在可行的替代方法,可用于某些头痛病例以减轻疼痛。
在尸体解剖和术中评估GON/LON切断后神经封端的技术可行性。从门诊就诊中收集患者在3至4个月期间报告的结果。在1年随访时,将主观结果和偏头痛头痛指数评分制成表格。
两名患者接受神经封端治疗难治性头痛,这些头痛对药物治疗和手术减压均无效,疼痛得到显著改善直至完全缓解,且无术后并发症。这些在疼痛频率、强度和持续时间方面的改善在1年时间点保持稳定(偏头痛头痛指数评分降低-180至-205)。
外科医生应具备处理近端神经残端的能力,以防止神经瘤和神经性疼痛复发。除了已知的当代神经重建技术,如靶向肌肉再支配/再生周围神经接口和移位神经移植,神经封端是外科医生在GON和LON疼痛情况下处理近端神经残端的另一种可行方法。该方法手术时间短,仅需有限的解剖操作,且能显著改善疼痛症状。