独立成分分析:基于任务的功能磁共振成像中通用线性模型的可靠替代方法。

Independent component analysis: a reliable alternative to general linear model for task-based fMRI.

作者信息

Gkiatis Kostakis, Garganis Kyriakos, Karanasiou Irene, Chatzisotiriou Athanasios, Zountsas Basilios, Kondylidis Nikolaos, Matsopoulos George K

机构信息

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Epilepsy Monitoring Department, St. Luke's Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 16;14:1214067. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1214067. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a valuable tool for the presurgical evaluation of patients undergoing neurosurgeries. Although many pre-processing steps have been modified according to advances in recent years, statistical analysis has remained largely the same since the first days of fMRI. In this study, we examined the ability of Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to separate the activation of a language task in fMRI, and we compared it with the results of the General Lineal Model (GLM).

METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing evaluation for brain surgery due to various brain lesions and/or epilepsy and 20 control subjects completed an fMRI language mapping protocol that included three tasks, resulting in 259 fMRI scans. Depending on brain lesion characteristics, patients were allocated to (1) static/chronic not-expanding lesions (Group 1) and (2) progressive/expanding lesions (Group 2). GLM and ICA statistical maps were evaluated by fMRI experts to assess the performance of each technique.

RESULTS

In the control group, ICA and GLM maps were similar without any superiority of either technique. In Group 1 and Group 2, ICA performed statistically better than GLM, with a -value of < 0.01801 and < 0.0237, respectively. This indicated that ICA performs as well as GLM when the subjects are able to cooperate well (less movement, good task performance), but ICA could outperform GLM in the patient groups. When both techniques were combined, 240 out of 259 scans produced reliable results, showing that the sensitivity of task-based fMRI can be increased when both techniques are integrated with the clinical setup.

CONCLUSION

ICA may be slightly more advantageous, compared to GLM, in patients with brain lesions, across the range of pathologies included in our population and independent of symptoms chronicity. Our findings suggest that GLM analysis may be more susceptible to brain activity perturbations induced by a variety of lesions or scanner-induced artifacts due to motion or other factors. In our research, we demonstrated that ICA is able to provide fMRI results that can be used in surgery, taking into account patient and task-wise aspects that differ from those when fMRI is used in research.

摘要

背景

功能磁共振成像(fMRI)是神经外科手术患者术前评估的重要工具。尽管近年来许多预处理步骤已根据进展进行了修改,但自fMRI诞生之初,统计分析在很大程度上仍保持不变。在本研究中,我们检验了独立成分分析(ICA)在fMRI中分离语言任务激活的能力,并将其与一般线性模型(GLM)的结果进行比较。

方法

60例因各种脑部病变和/或癫痫接受脑外科手术评估的患者以及20例对照受试者完成了一项fMRI语言映射方案,该方案包括三项任务,共获得259次fMRI扫描。根据脑病变特征,将患者分为(1)静态/慢性非扩展性病变组(第1组)和(2)进行性/扩展性病变组(第2组)。fMRI专家对GLM和ICA统计图谱进行评估,以评估每种技术的性能。

结果

在对照组中,ICA和GLM图谱相似,两种技术均无明显优势。在第1组和第2组中,ICA在统计学上的表现优于GLM,p值分别<0.01801和<0.0237。这表明当受试者能够良好配合(较少运动、任务表现良好)时,ICA的表现与GLM相当,但在患者组中ICA可能优于GLM。当两种技术结合使用时,259次扫描中有240次产生了可靠的结果,表明将两种技术与临床设置相结合时,基于任务的fMRI的敏感性可以提高。

结论

与GLM相比,ICA在我们研究人群中所涵盖的各种病理类型的脑病变患者中可能略具优势,且与症状的慢性程度无关。我们的研究结果表明,GLM分析可能更容易受到由各种病变或因运动或其他因素导致的扫描仪诱导伪影所引起的脑活动干扰。在我们的研究中,我们证明了ICA能够提供可用于手术的fMRI结果,同时考虑到与fMRI用于研究时不同的患者和任务方面的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf6e/10468574/5ec12d75372c/fpsyt-14-1214067-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索