相似文献
1
The write algorithm: promoting responsible artificial intelligence usage and accountability in academic writing.写作算法：促进学术写作中负责任的人工智能使用及问责制。
BMC Med. 2023 Sep 4;21(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03039-7.
2
Artificial intelligence in health care: accountability and safety.人工智能在医疗保健中的应用：责任与安全。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Apr 1;98(4):251-256. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.237487. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
3
Fake academic writing: ethics during chatbot era.虚假学术写作：人工智能时代的伦理道德。
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2023 Jun 1;24(2):88-89. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2023.24.02.01.
4
[Study on Technical Risks and Primary Responsibility of Medical Artificial Intelligence Diagnosis Products under Strategy of "Healthy China"].["健康中国”战略下医学人工智能诊断产品的技术风险与主要责任研究]
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 8;45(1):67-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.2021.01.014.
5
Individualised Responsible Artificial Intelligence for Home-Based Rehabilitation.基于居家康复的个体化负责任人工智能
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 22;21(1):2. doi: 10.3390/s21010002.
6
Can We Write a Research Paper Using Artificial Intelligence?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 May;81(5):524-526. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2023.01.011.
7
[Can artificial intelligence write a medical-scientific article of sufficient quality?].人工智能能写出质量足够高的医学科学文章吗？
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2023 Apr 12;167:D7496.
8
AI ethics, accountability, and sustainability: revisiting the Hippocratic oath.人工智能伦理、问责制与可持续性：重温希波克拉底誓言
Acta Orthop. 2020 Feb;91(1):1-2. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1682850. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
9
Ethical barriers to artificial intelligence in the national health service, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.大不列颠及北爱尔兰联合王国国民医疗服务体系中人工智能的伦理障碍。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Apr 1;98(4):293-295. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.237230. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
10
Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance.学术写作中的人工智能：一项具有范式转变意义的技术进步。
Nat Rev Urol. 2023 Jun;20(6):327-328. doi: 10.1038/s41585-023-00746-x.
引用本文的文献
1
Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) usage guidelines for scholarly publishing: a cross-sectional study of medical journals.学术出版中生成式人工智能（GAI）的使用指南：医学期刊的横断面研究
BMC Med. 2025 Feb 11;23(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03899-1.
2
Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI.利用生成式人工智能提升学术写作的技巧。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2025 Apr;9(4):426-431. doi: 10.1038/s41551-024-01185-8.
3
Functional connectivity of cognition-related brain networks in adults with fetal alcohol syndrome.成人胎儿酒精综合征患者认知相关脑网络的功能连接。
BMC Med. 2023 Dec 13;21(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03208-8.
本文引用的文献
1
ChatGPT and large language models in academia: opportunities and challenges.学术界的ChatGPT与大型语言模型：机遇与挑战
BioData Min. 2023 Jul 13;16(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13040-023-00339-9.
2
AI-generated text may have a role in evidence-based medicine.人工智能生成的文本可能在循证医学中发挥作用。
Nat Med. 2023 Jul;29(7):1593-1594. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02366-9.
3
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review.对抗审稿人疲劳还是加剧偏见？关于在学术同行评审中使用ChatGPT和其他大语言模型的思考与建议。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023 May 18;8(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00133-5.
4
ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health.ChatGPT 和大型语言模型的兴起：公共卫生领域新的 AI 驱动的信息疫情威胁。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 25;11:1166120. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1166120. eCollection 2023.
5
The dangers of using large language models for peer review.使用大语言模型进行同行评审的风险。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Jul;23(7):781. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00290-6. Epub 2023 May 10.
6
Journals take up arms against AI-written text.期刊杂志联手抵制 AI 生成文本。
Science. 2023 Feb 24;379(6634):740-741. doi: 10.1126/science.adh2762. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
7
Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing.使用ChatGPT生成学术内容：医学出版面临的伦理挑战。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Mar;5(3):e105-e106. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00019-5. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
8
What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science.ChatGPT和生成式人工智能对科学意味着什么。
Nature. 2023 Feb;614(7947):214-216. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6.
Zotero 插件