Suppr超能文献

在一个具有遗传信息的样本中,在不同情境下评估执行功能之间的关联。

Associations between executive functions assessed in different contexts in a genetically informative sample.

机构信息

Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado Boulder.

Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jan;153(1):70-85. doi: 10.1037/xge0001471. Epub 2023 Sep 4.

Abstract

Executive functions (EFs) are cognitive functions that help direct goal-related behavior. EFs are usually measured via behavioral tasks assessed in highly controlled laboratory settings under the supervision of a research assistant. Online versions of EF tasks are an increasingly popular alternative to in-lab testing. However, researchers do not have the same control over the testing environment during online EF assessments. To assess the extent to which EFs assessed in-lab and online are related, we used data from the Colorado Online Twin Study (CoTwins; 887 individual twins aged 13.98-19.05) and constructed an Lab Common EF factor and an Online Common EF factor from four EF tasks assessed in-lab and online. The Lab Common and Online Common EF factors were genetically identical (A = 1.00) but phenotypically separable ( = .77, 95% confidence interval [0.59, 0.94]) indicating that these EF factors have the same genetic underpinnings but may be differentially influenced by environmental factors. We examined phenotypic, genetic, and environmental correlations between the EF factors and a general cognitive ability factor (g) assessed in the lab and found similar relationships between Lab Common EF and g and Online Common EF and g. Overall, these results suggest that Common EF factors assessed in different contexts are highly related to each other and similarly related to other cognitive outcomes. These findings indicate that online task-based EF assessments could be a viable strategy for increasing sample sizes in large-scale studies, particularly genetically informed studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

执行功能(EFs)是一种认知功能,有助于指导与目标相关的行为。EFs 通常通过在研究助理监督下在高度受控的实验室环境中进行的行为任务来测量。EF 任务的在线版本是替代实验室测试的一种越来越流行的方法。然而,在进行在线 EF 评估时,研究人员对测试环境没有相同的控制。为了评估在实验室和在线环境中评估的 EFs 之间的相关性,我们使用了来自科罗拉多州在线双胞胎研究(CoTwins;887 名年龄在 13.98-19.05 岁的个体双胞胎)的数据,并从四个在实验室和在线评估的 EF 任务中构建了一个实验室共同 EF 因素和一个在线共同 EF 因素。实验室共同 EF 因素和在线共同 EF 因素在遗传上是相同的(A = 1.00),但表型上是可分离的( =.77,95%置信区间[0.59, 0.94]),这表明这些 EF 因素具有相同的遗传基础,但可能受到环境因素的不同影响。我们研究了 EF 因素与在实验室评估的一般认知能力因素(g)之间的表型、遗传和环境相关性,发现实验室共同 EF 和 g 以及在线共同 EF 和 g 之间存在相似的关系。总体而言,这些结果表明,在不同背景下评估的共同 EF 因素彼此高度相关,并且与其他认知结果相似相关。这些发现表明,基于在线任务的 EF 评估可能是增加大规模研究特别是遗传信息研究样本量的可行策略。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/081f/10843656/afc49e754445/nihms-1923952-f0001.jpg

相似文献

6
Strong genetic overlap between executive functions and intelligence.执行功能与智力之间存在很强的基因重叠。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Sep;145(9):1141-59. doi: 10.1037/xge0000195. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
7
Genetic and environmental architecture of executive functions in midlife.中年执行功能的遗传和环境结构。
Neuropsychology. 2018 Jan;32(1):18-30. doi: 10.1037/neu0000389. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
8
Genes Unite Executive Functions in Childhood.基因在儿童期整合执行功能。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Aug;26(8):1151-63. doi: 10.1177/0956797615577209. Epub 2015 Jul 8.

本文引用的文献

4
Do Rating and Task Measures of Control Abilities Assess the Same Thing?控制能力的评分和任务测量评估的是同一事物吗?
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2022 Jun;31(3):262-271. doi: 10.1177/09637214221091824. Epub 2022 May 18.
10
Twin studies to GWAS: there and back again.双生子研究与 GWAS:去而复返。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Oct;25(10):855-869. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Jul 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验