• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展和复制客观的社会视觉参与测量方法,以帮助早期诊断和评估自闭症。

Development and Replication of Objective Measurements of Social Visual Engagement to Aid in Early Diagnosis and Assessment of Autism.

机构信息

Marcus Autism Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia.

Division of Autism and Related Disabilities, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2330145. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30145.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30145
PMID:37669054
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10481232/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Autism spectrum disorder is a common and early-emerging neurodevelopmental condition. While 80% of parents report having had concerns for their child's development before age 2 years, many children are not diagnosed until ages 4 to 5 years or later.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an objective performance-based tool to aid in early diagnosis and assessment of autism in children younger than 3 years.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In 2 prospective, consecutively enrolled, broad-spectrum, double-blind studies, we developed an objective eye-tracking-based index test for children aged 16 to 30 months, compared its performance with best-practice reference standard diagnosis of autism (discovery study), and then replicated findings in an independent sample (replication study). Discovery and replication studies were conducted in specialty centers for autism diagnosis and treatment. Reference standard diagnoses were made using best-practice standardized protocols by specialists blind to eye-tracking results. Eye-tracking tests were administered by staff blind to clinical results. Children were enrolled from April 27, 2013, until September 26, 2017. Data were analyzed from March 28, 2018, to January 3, 2019.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Prespecified primary end points were the sensitivity and specificity of the eye-tracking-based index test compared with the reference standard. Prespecified secondary end points measured convergent validity between eye-tracking-based indices and reference standard assessments of social disability, verbal ability, and nonverbal ability.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 1089 children: 719 children (mean [SD] age, 22.4 [3.6] months) in the discovery study, and 370 children (mean [SD] age, 25.4 [6.0] months) in the replication study. In discovery, 224 (31.2%) were female and 495 (68.8%) male; in replication, 120 (32.4%) were female and 250 (67.6%) male. Based on reference standard expert clinical diagnosis, there were 386 participants (53.7%) with nonautism diagnoses and 333 (46.3%) with autism diagnoses in discovery, and 184 participants (49.7%) with nonautism diagnoses and 186 (50.3%) with autism diagnoses in replication. In the discovery study, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.92), sensitivity was 81.9% (95% CI, 77.3%-85.7%), and specificity was 89.9% (95% CI, 86.4%-92.5%). In the replication study, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.93), sensitivity was 80.6% (95% CI, 74.1%-85.7%), and specificity was 82.3% (95% CI, 76.1%-87.2%). Eye-tracking test results correlated with expert clinical assessments of children's individual levels of ability, explaining 68.6% (95% CI, 58.3%-78.6%), 63.4% (95% CI, 47.9%-79.2%), and 49.0% (95% CI, 33.8%-65.4%) of variance in reference standard assessments of social disability, verbal ability, and nonverbal cognitive ability, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In two diagnostic studies of children younger than 3 years, objective eye-tracking-based measurements of social visual engagement quantified diagnostic status as well as individual levels of social disability, verbal ability, and nonverbal ability in autism. These findings suggest that objective measurements of social visual engagement can be used to aid in autism diagnosis and assessment.

摘要

重要性

自闭症谱系障碍是一种常见的早期神经发育疾病。虽然 80%的父母报告说在孩子 2 岁之前就已经对孩子的发育有了担忧,但许多孩子直到 4 到 5 岁或更晚才被诊断出来。

目的

开发一种客观的基于表现的工具,以帮助在 3 岁以下儿童中早期诊断和评估自闭症。

设计、设置和参与者:在两项前瞻性、连续纳入的广谱、双盲研究中,我们为 16 至 30 个月大的儿童开发了一种基于客观眼动追踪的指标测试,将其与自闭症的最佳实践参考标准诊断(发现研究)进行比较,并在独立样本(复制研究)中复制发现。发现和复制研究是在自闭症诊断和治疗的专业中心进行的。参考标准诊断是由对眼动追踪结果盲目的专家使用最佳实践标准化协议做出的。由对临床结果盲目的工作人员进行眼动追踪测试。研究对象于 2013 年 4 月 27 日至 2017 年 9 月 26 日招募。数据分析时间为 2018 年 3 月 28 日至 2019 年 1 月 3 日。

主要结果和措施

预设的主要终点是与参考标准相比,眼动追踪指标测试的敏感性和特异性。预设的次要终点衡量了眼动追踪指标与社会残疾、语言能力和非语言认知能力的参考标准评估之间的收敛有效性。

结果

共收集了 1089 名儿童的数据:发现研究中 719 名儿童(平均[标准差]年龄,22.4[3.6]个月),复制研究中 370 名儿童(平均[标准差]年龄,25.4[6.0]个月)。在发现研究中,224 名(31.2%)为女性,495 名(68.8%)为男性;在复制研究中,120 名(32.4%)为女性,250 名(67.6%)为男性。根据参考标准专家临床诊断,发现研究中 386 名参与者(53.7%)非自闭症诊断,333 名(46.3%)自闭症诊断,复制研究中 184 名参与者(49.7%)非自闭症诊断,186 名(50.3%)自闭症诊断。在发现研究中,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.90(95%置信区间,0.88-0.92),敏感性为 81.9%(95%置信区间,77.3%-85.7%),特异性为 89.9%(95%置信区间,86.4%-92.5%)。在复制研究中,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.89(95%置信区间,0.86-0.93),敏感性为 80.6%(95%置信区间,74.1%-85.7%),特异性为 82.3%(95%置信区间,76.1%-87.2%)。眼动追踪测试结果与专家临床评估儿童个体能力水平相关,解释了参考标准评估的社会残疾、语言能力和非语言认知能力的 68.6%(95%置信区间,58.3%-78.6%)、63.4%(95%置信区间,47.9%-79.2%)和 49.0%(95%置信区间,33.8%-65.4%)的差异。

结论和相关性

在两项针对 3 岁以下儿童的诊断研究中,基于客观眼动追踪的社会视觉参与度测量可以定量诊断自闭症状态以及自闭症儿童的社会残疾、语言能力和非语言认知能力的个体水平。这些发现表明,社会视觉参与度的客观测量可以用于辅助自闭症的诊断和评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2fa/10481232/a662f0bf7d2b/jamanetwopen-e2330145-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2fa/10481232/aeb47fbec93c/jamanetwopen-e2330145-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2fa/10481232/97e7e94d9e9e/jamanetwopen-e2330145-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2fa/10481232/a3f5e3b8b860/jamanetwopen-e2330145-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2fa/10481232/a662f0bf7d2b/jamanetwopen-e2330145-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2fa/10481232/aeb47fbec93c/jamanetwopen-e2330145-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2fa/10481232/97e7e94d9e9e/jamanetwopen-e2330145-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2fa/10481232/a3f5e3b8b860/jamanetwopen-e2330145-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2fa/10481232/a662f0bf7d2b/jamanetwopen-e2330145-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Replication of Objective Measurements of Social Visual Engagement to Aid in Early Diagnosis and Assessment of Autism.发展和复制客观的社会视觉参与测量方法,以帮助早期诊断和评估自闭症。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2330145. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30145.
2
Eye-Tracking-Based Measurement of Social Visual Engagement Compared With Expert Clinical Diagnosis of Autism.基于眼动追踪的社会视觉参与度测量与自闭症专家临床诊断的比较。
JAMA. 2023 Sep 5;330(9):854-865. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.13295.
3
Eye-Tracking Biomarkers and Autism Diagnosis in Primary Care.眼动追踪生物标志物与初级保健中的自闭症诊断。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2411190. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11190.
4
Clinician Diagnostic Certainty and the Role of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule in Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis in Young Children.临床医生诊断的确定性和孤独症诊断观察量表在幼儿孤独症谱系障碍诊断中的作用。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Dec 1;176(12):1233-1241. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3605.
5
Development and Validation of Objective and Quantitative Eye Tracking-Based Measures of Autism Risk and Symptom Levels.自闭症风险和症状水平的基于客观和定量眼动追踪的测量方法的开发和验证。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;57(11):858-866. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.06.023. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Comparison of three different eye-tracking tasks for distinguishing autistic from typically developing children and autistic symptom severity.比较三种不同的眼动追踪任务,以区分自闭症儿童和典型发育儿童以及自闭症症状严重程度。
Autism Res. 2019 Oct;12(10):1529-1540. doi: 10.1002/aur.2174. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Social Attention and Communication Surveillance-Revised With Preschool Tool for Early Autism Detection in Very Young Children.社会关注与沟通监测修订版(学龄前)早期自闭症检测工具对非常年幼的儿童的诊断准确性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e2146415. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46415.
9
The autism symptom interview, school-age: A brief telephone interview to identify autism spectrum disorders in 5-to-12-year-old children.《学龄期自闭症症状访谈:一项用于识别5至12岁儿童自闭症谱系障碍的简短电话访谈》
Autism Res. 2017 Jan;10(1):78-88. doi: 10.1002/aur.1645. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
10
Communication interventions for autism spectrum disorder in minimally verbal children.针对极少言语儿童自闭症谱系障碍的沟通干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 5;11(11):CD012324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012324.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Presymptomatic Biological, Structural, and Functional Diagnostic Biomarkers of Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍的症状前生物学、结构和功能诊断生物标志物
J Neurochem. 2025 May;169(5):e70088. doi: 10.1111/jnc.70088.
2
Hidden social and emotional competencies in autism spectrum disorders captured through the digital lens.通过数字视角捕捉自闭症谱系障碍中隐藏的社会和情感能力。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 7;16:1559202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1559202. eCollection 2025.
3
Automatic Cry Analysis: Deep Learning for Screening of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Early Childhood.

本文引用的文献

1
Eye-Tracking-Based Measurement of Social Visual Engagement Compared With Expert Clinical Diagnosis of Autism.基于眼动追踪的社会视觉参与度测量与自闭症专家临床诊断的比较。
JAMA. 2023 Sep 5;330(9):854-865. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.13295.
2
Prevalence and Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2020.2020 年,美国 11 个监测点自闭症和发育障碍监测网络 8 岁儿童自闭症谱系障碍的流行率和特征。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023 Mar 24;72(2):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7202a1.
3
Expert Clinician Certainty in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorder in 16-30-Month-Olds: A Multi-site Trial Secondary Analysis.
自动哭声分析:用于幼儿自闭症谱系障碍筛查的深度学习
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06811-1.
4
Causation, trait correlation, and translation: Developmental brain imaging in research on neuropsychiatric conditions of childhood.因果关系、特质相关性与转化:儿童神经精神疾病研究中的发育脑成像
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Apr;72:101513. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101513. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
5
A multimodal neural signature of face processing in autism within the fusiform gyrus.梭状回中自闭症患者面部处理的多模态神经特征。
Nat Ment Health. 2025;3(1):31-45. doi: 10.1038/s44220-024-00349-4. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
6
Preserved but Un-Sustained Responses to Bids for Dyadic Engagement in School-Age Children with Autism.自闭症学龄儿童对二元互动邀请的保留但未持续的反应。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Jan 4. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06691-x.
7
Acoustic features of vocalizations in typically developing and autistic infants in the first year.正常发育婴儿和自闭症婴儿在第一年的发声声学特征。
Res Dev Disabil. 2024 Nov;154:104849. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104849. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
8
Eye-Tracking Biomarkers and Autism Diagnosis in Primary Care.眼动追踪生物标志物与初级保健中的自闭症诊断。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2411190. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11190.
9
The LEADING Guideline: Reporting Standards for Expert Panel, Best-Estimate Diagnosis, and Longitudinal Expert All Data (LEAD) Studies.《LEADING指南:专家小组、最佳估计诊断和纵向专家全数据(LEAD)研究的报告标准》
medRxiv. 2024 Sep 4:2024.03.19.24304526. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.19.24304526.
10
Autism Spectrum Disorder: Brain Areas Involved, Neurobiological Mechanisms, Diagnoses and Therapies.自闭症谱系障碍:涉及的脑区、神经生物学机制、诊断和治疗。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Feb 19;25(4):2423. doi: 10.3390/ijms25042423.
专家临床医生对16至30个月大儿童自闭症谱系障碍的诊断确定性:一项多中心试验的二次分析
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Feb;54(2):393-408. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05812-8. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
4
Progress and Disparities in Early Identification of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 2002-2016.自闭症谱系障碍早期识别的进展和差异:自闭症和发育障碍监测网络,2002-2016 年。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;61(7):905-914. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.11.019. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
5
Rethinking autism spectrum disorder assessment for children during COVID-19 and beyond.重新思考 COVID-19 期间及之后儿童自闭症谱系障碍的评估。
Autism Res. 2021 Nov;14(11):2251-2259. doi: 10.1002/aur.2615. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
6
Commentary: Challenges and opportunities in autism assessment - a commentary on Kanne and Bishop (2020).述评:自闭症评估中的挑战与机遇——评 Kanne 和 Bishop(2020)。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;62(2):146-148. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13360. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
7
Timing of the Diagnosis of Autism in African American Children.非裔美国儿童自闭症的诊断时间。
Pediatrics. 2020 Sep;146(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3629.
8
Early developmental changes in visual social engagement in infant rhesus monkeys.婴儿恒河猴视觉社会参与的早期发育变化。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Jun;43:100778. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100778. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
9
Commentary: Embracing innovation is necessary to improve assessment and care for individuals with ASD: a reflection on Kanne and Bishop (2020).述评:拥抱创新对于改善 ASD 个体的评估和照护十分必要:对 Kanne 和 Bishop(2020)的反思。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;62(2):143-145. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13271. Epub 2020 May 30.
10
Editorial Perspective: The autism waitlist crisis and remembering what families need.社论观点:自闭症候诊名单危机和记住家庭所需。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;62(2):140-142. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13254. Epub 2020 May 8.