• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨如何提高波兰和南亚社区在大数据研究中的参与度。一项使用 COM-B 模型的定性研究。

Exploring how to improve the involvement of Polish and South Asian communities around big data research. A qualitative study using COM-B model.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Policy & Systems, University of Liverpool.

National Disease Registration Service, NHS England.

出版信息

Int J Popul Data Sci. 2023 Jul 13;8(1):2130. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2130. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2130
PMID:37670958
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10476635/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Involving public contributors helps researchers to ensure that public views are taken into consideration when designing and planning research, so that it is person-centred and relevant to the public. This paper will consider public involvement in big data research. Inclusion of different communities is needed to ensure everyone's voice is heard. However, there remains limited evidence on how to improve the involvement of seldom-heard communities in big data research.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to understand how South Asians and Polish communities in the UK can be encouraged to participate in public involvement initiatives in big data research.

METHODS

Forty interviews were conducted with Polish (n=20) and South Asian (n=20) participants on Zoom. The participants were living in the United Kingdom and had not previously been involved as public contributors. Transcribed interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We identified eight themes. The 'happy to reuse data' theme sets the scene by exploring our participants' views towards big data research and under what circumstances they thought that data could be used. The remaining themes were mapped under the capability-opportunity-motivation-behaviour (COM-B) model, as developed by Michie and colleagues. This allowed us to discuss multiple factors that could influence people's willingness to become public contributors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is the first to explore how to improve the involvement and engagement of seldom-heard communities in big data research using the COM-B model. The results have the potential to support researchers who want to identify what can influence members of the public to be involved. By using the COM-B model, it is possible to determine what measures could be implemented to better engage these communities.

摘要

简介

让公众参与有助于研究人员在设计和规划研究时考虑公众的意见,使研究以人为本,与公众息息相关。本文将探讨公众在大数据研究中的参与度。为了确保每个人的声音都被听到,需要包容不同的社区。然而,关于如何提高大数据研究中鲜为人知的社区的参与度,仍缺乏证据。

目的

本研究旨在了解如何鼓励英国的南亚人和波兰社区参与大数据研究中的公众参与倡议。

方法

通过 Zoom 对 40 名波兰(n=20)和南亚(n=20)参与者进行了访谈。参与者居住在英国,之前没有作为公众贡献者参与过。使用反思性主题分析对转录的访谈进行了分析。

结果

我们确定了 8 个主题。“乐于重复使用数据”这一主题通过探讨参与者对大数据研究的看法以及他们认为在什么情况下可以使用数据,为我们的研究奠定了基础。其余主题根据 Michie 及其同事开发的能力-机会-动机-行为(COM-B)模型进行了映射。这使我们能够讨论影响人们成为公众贡献者意愿的多个因素。

结论

本研究首次使用 COM-B 模型探讨了如何提高鲜为人知的社区在大数据研究中的参与度和参与度。研究结果有可能为希望确定哪些因素可以影响公众参与的研究人员提供支持。通过使用 COM-B 模型,可以确定可以采取哪些措施来更好地吸引这些社区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8970/10476635/2a915ef609f6/ijpds-08-2130-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8970/10476635/d20510be6b2e/ijpds-08-2130-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8970/10476635/2a915ef609f6/ijpds-08-2130-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8970/10476635/d20510be6b2e/ijpds-08-2130-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8970/10476635/2a915ef609f6/ijpds-08-2130-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring how to improve the involvement of Polish and South Asian communities around big data research. A qualitative study using COM-B model.探讨如何提高波兰和南亚社区在大数据研究中的参与度。一项使用 COM-B 模型的定性研究。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2023 Jul 13;8(1):2130. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2130. eCollection 2023.
2
'To me, it's ones and zeros, but in reality that one is death': A qualitative study exploring researchers' experience of involving and engaging seldom-heard communities in big data research.“对我来说,这只是 1 和 0,但实际上,那就是死亡”:一项定性研究,探索研究人员在大数据研究中涉及和吸引很少被听到的社区的经验。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):882-891. doi: 10.1111/hex.13713. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
3
Including 'seldom heard' views in research: opportunities, challenges and recommendations from focus groups with British South Asian people with type 2 diabetes.将“罕见”观点纳入研究:英国南亚 2 型糖尿病患者焦点小组的机会、挑战和建议。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 15;20(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01045-4.
4
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
5
"Data makes the story come to life:" understanding the ethical and legal implications of Big Data research involving ethnic minority healthcare workers in the United Kingdom-a qualitative study.“数据让故事生动起来”:理解英国少数民族医疗工作者大数据研究的伦理和法律影响——一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 16;23(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00875-9.
6
Conceptualising and constructing 'diversity' through experiences of public and patient involvement in health research.通过公众和患者参与健康研究的经历来概念化和构建“多样性”。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 22;7:53. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00296-9. eCollection 2021.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Key considerations when involving children in health intervention design: reflections on working in partnership with South Asian children in the UK on a tailored Management and Intervention for Asthma (MIA) study.让儿童参与健康干预设计时的关键考量:关于在英国与南亚儿童合作开展一项针对哮喘的定制管理与干预(MIA)研究的思考
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 28;8(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00342-0.
9
Codesigning person-centred quality indicators with diverse communities: A qualitative patient engagement study.与多元化社区共同设计以人为本的质量指标:一项定性的患者参与研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2188-2202. doi: 10.1111/hex.13388. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
10
'He or she maybe doesn't know there is such a thing as a review': A qualitative investigation exploring barriers and facilitators to accessing medication reviews from the perspective of people from ethnic minority communities.“他或她可能不知道有这样一种叫做药物审查的东西”:一项从少数民族社区人群的角度出发,探讨获取药物审查服务的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1432-1443. doi: 10.1111/hex.13482. Epub 2022 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Public Involvement in Doctoral Research Using a Four-Dimensional Theoretical Framework.使用四维理论框架评估公众参与博士研究的情况。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14149. doi: 10.1111/hex.14149.

本文引用的文献

1
'To me, it's ones and zeros, but in reality that one is death': A qualitative study exploring researchers' experience of involving and engaging seldom-heard communities in big data research.“对我来说,这只是 1 和 0,但实际上,那就是死亡”:一项定性研究,探索研究人员在大数据研究中涉及和吸引很少被听到的社区的经验。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):882-891. doi: 10.1111/hex.13713. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
2
Attitudes towards the collection and linkage of maltreatment data for research: A qualitative study.对虐待数据收集和链接进行研究的态度:一项定性研究。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2022 Jan 26;7(1):1693. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1693. eCollection 2022.
3
The social licence for data-intensive health research: towards co-creation, public value and trust.
数据密集型健康研究的社会许可:走向共同创造、公共价值和信任。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Aug 10;22(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00677-5.
4
Co-development of a Best Practice Checklist for Mental Health Data Science: A Delphi Study.心理健康数据科学最佳实践清单的共同开发:一项德尔菲研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 10;12:643914. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.643914. eCollection 2021.
5
A Profile of the SAIL Databank on the UK Secure Research Platform.英国安全研究平台上的SAIL数据库简介。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2019 Nov 20;4(2):1134. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i2.1134.
6
Sharing linked data sets for research: results from a deliberative public engagement event in British Columbia, Canada.共享用于研究的关联数据集:加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省一次公众参与审议活动的结果
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2019 May 7;4(1):1103. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.1103.
7
Consensus Statement on Public Involvement and Engagement with Data Intensive Health Research.关于公众参与和参与数据密集型健康研究的共识声明。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2019 Feb 12;4(1):586. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.586.
8
Capability, opportunity, and motivation: an across contexts empirical examination of the COM-B model.能力、机会和动机:对COM-B模型的跨情境实证研究
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 29;21(1):1014. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11019-w.
9
Patient partners' perspectives of meaningful engagement in synthesis reviews: A patient-oriented rapid review.患者伙伴对综合研究中具有意义的参与的看法:一项面向患者的快速综述。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1056-1071. doi: 10.1111/hex.13279. Epub 2021 May 28.
10
Trust, security and public interest: striking the balance A narrative review of previous literature on public attitudes towards the sharing, linking and use of administrative data for research.信任、安全与公共利益:寻求平衡 对以往关于公众对行政数据用于研究的共享、关联和使用态度的文献进行的叙述性综述
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2020 Dec 11;5(3):1368. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i3.1368.