Suppr超能文献

基于急诊严重程度指数的分诊不足与过度分诊的相关因素;一项回顾性横断面研究。

Associated Factors of Under and Over-Triage Based on The Emergency Severity Index; a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Huabbangyang Thongpitak, Rojsaengroeng Rapeeporn, Tiyawat Gawin, Silakoon Agasak, Vanichkulbodee Alissara, Sri-On Jiraporn, Buathong Siriwimol

机构信息

Department of Disaster and Emergency Medical Operation, Faculty of Science and Health Technology, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Aug 21;11(1):e57. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2076. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Under-triage increases patients' risks for morbidity and mortality, whereas over-triage limits the resources available to sicker patients. This study aimed to determine the rates as well as associated factors of under-triage and over-triage in emergency department (ED), based on Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage system.

METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, triage level of ED patients based on the ESI version 4, was studied during a 9-month period in 2019. Patients' ESI level, which were examined by triage nurses were reevaluated by 3 emergency physicians and the rate of correct, under-, and over-triage as well as their associated factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

1000 cases of triage were evaluated. Triage was correct in 69.1% of cases. The rate of under-triage was 4.9%, and that of over-triage was 26.0%. Over-triage was significantly more common among patients aged 18-30 years than for those aged ≥65 years (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-2.81; p = 0.026); those with traumatic injuries (adjusted OR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.29-2.52; p = 0.001); those arriving at the hospital during the evening shift (adjusted OR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.01-2.0; p = 0.046); patients who were hospitalized (adjusted OR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.22-0.54; p < 0.001); and those with severe pain (adjusted OR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10-0.84; p = 0.023). Younger age was also significantly associated with under-triage. Patients aged 18-30 years were under-triaged more often than those aged ≥65 years (adjusted OR = 3.05; 95% CI: 1.16-8.00; p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Over-triage was substantially more common than under-triage in Vajira Hospital. Factors associated with over-triage were younger age, traumatic injury, arrival time, hospital admission, and severe pain. Younger age was the only factor related to under-triage.

摘要

引言

分诊不足会增加患者发病和死亡的风险,而过度分诊则会限制分配给病情较重患者的资源。本研究旨在基于急诊严重程度指数(ESI)分诊系统,确定急诊科分诊不足和过度分诊的发生率及其相关因素。

方法

在这项回顾性横断面研究中,对2019年9个月期间急诊科患者基于ESI第4版的分诊级别进行了研究。分诊护士检查的患者ESI级别由3名急诊医生重新评估,并分析正确分诊、分诊不足和过度分诊的发生率及其相关因素。

结果

共评估了1000例分诊情况。69.1%的病例分诊正确。分诊不足的发生率为4.9%,过度分诊的发生率为26.0%。18至30岁患者的过度分诊明显比65岁及以上患者更常见(调整后的优势比[OR]=1.73;95%置信区间[CI]:1.07-2.81;p=0.026);有创伤性损伤的患者(调整后的OR=1.80;95%CI:1.29-2.52;p=0.001);在晚班期间到达医院的患者(调整后的OR=1.42;95%CI:1.01-2.0;p=0.046);住院患者(调整后的OR=0.35;95%CI:0.22-0.54;p<0.001);以及有严重疼痛的患者(调整后的OR=0.28;95%CI:0.10-0.84;p=0.023)。年龄较小也与分诊不足显著相关。18至30岁的患者比分诊65岁及以上的患者更常出现分诊不足(调整后的OR=3.05;95%CI:1.16-8.00;p=0.023)。

结论

在 Vajira 医院,过度分诊比分诊不足更为常见。与过度分诊相关的因素包括年龄较小、创伤性损伤、到达时间、住院情况和严重疼痛。年龄较小是与分诊不足相关的唯一因素。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验