Santos Gustavo Souza, Artal Mariana Coletty, Paniago Mario Del Giudice, Cione Ana P Paola, Casallanovo Fábio, Farrelly Eamonn, Kragten Steven, Maul Jonathan D
Syngenta Proteção de Cultivos Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil.
Syngenta Ltd, Bracknell, UK.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2024 May;20(3):864-874. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4839. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
The relationship between agriculture and wildlife can be both synergetic and challenging, as the increased surface of agricultural land makes it increasingly important for agriculture and wildlife to coexist. This study aims to describe the use of freshly drilled dry bean fields by birds and mammals in Brazilian Cerrado and Atlantic Forest sites and their diversity and abundance within in-crop and off-crop areas (with native permanent vegetation and other surrounding crop fields) at four different farms. A comprehensive survey was conducted, using various sampling methods, including point counts, foraging counts, trail cameras, and occasional encounters. In all, contacts for 12 518 birds across 306 species and 313 mammals across 34 species were registered. The off-crop areas exhibited greater species richness, abundance, and diversity than the in-crop areas on all farms. For birds, 47 species were recorded in-crop, of which 15 were classified as insectivores, 15 as granivores, seven as omnivores, seven as carnivores, and three as frugivores. The number of in-crop observations per species was small. The abundance off-crop was greater for 31 species observed in-crop, indicating that dry bean fields are probably not a preferred habitat for those species. Species classified as granivorous are most likely to feed on dry bean seeds. However, almost all granivorous species observed in-crop areas are too small to be able to feed on dry bean seeds. For mammals, nine species were recorded in-crop, of which four were classified as carnivores, three as omnivores, one as insectivore, and one as granivore. Additionally, despite the considerable effort in this study, no evidence was found that birds and mammals feed on dry bean seeds. The results highlight the importance of off-crop areas in dry bean fields, characterized by a more diverse and abundant bird community than in-crop. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:864-874. © 2023 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
农业与野生动物之间的关系既可能是协同的,也可能具有挑战性,因为农业用地面积的增加使得农业与野生动物共存变得愈发重要。本研究旨在描述巴西塞拉多和大西洋森林地区鸟类和哺乳动物对新播种的干豆田的利用情况,以及它们在四个不同农场的作物种植区内和作物种植区外(有原生永久性植被和其他周边农田)的多样性和丰度。我们采用了多种抽样方法,包括定点计数、觅食计数、追踪相机和偶尔的偶遇,进行了全面的调查。总共记录了306种鸟类中的12518次接触和34种哺乳动物中的313次接触。在所有农场中,作物种植区外的物种丰富度、丰度和多样性均高于作物种植区内。对于鸟类,在作物种植区内记录到47种,其中15种被归类为食虫动物,15种为食谷动物,7种为杂食动物,7种为食肉动物,3种为食果动物。每个物种在作物种植区内的观察次数较少。在作物种植区内观察到的31个物种在作物种植区外的丰度更高,这表明干豆田可能不是这些物种的首选栖息地。被归类为食谷动物的物种最有可能以干豆种子为食。然而,在作物种植区内观察到的几乎所有食谷动物物种都太小,无法以干豆种子为食。对于哺乳动物,在作物种植区内记录到9种,其中4种被归类为食肉动物,3种为杂食动物,1种为食虫动物,1种为食谷动物。此外,尽管本研究付出了巨大努力,但未发现鸟类和哺乳动物以干豆种子为食的证据。研究结果凸显了干豆田作物种植区外区域的重要性,其特点是鸟类群落比作物种植区内更加多样和丰富。《综合环境评估与管理》2024年;20:864 - 874。© 2023作者。《综合环境评估与管理》由Wiley Periodicals LLC代表环境毒理学与化学学会(SETAC)出版。