• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定量分析术中数字减影血管造影参数评估关节支动脉栓塞后灌注变化。

Quantifying Change in Perfusion after Genicular Artery Embolization with Parametric Analysis of Intraprocedural Digital Subtraction Angiograms.

机构信息

Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/walsterIR.

Division of Pain Management, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/MagdaAnitescuMD.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023 Dec;34(12):2190-2196. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.08.041. Epub 2023 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2023.08.041
PMID:37673399
Abstract

PURPOSE

To quantify perfusion changes during genicular artery embolization (GAE) with the qualitatively described "pruning" technique using parametric analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 12 patients underwent unilateral GAE with a total of 36 vessels embolized. Among 34 of the 36 vessels embolized, regions of interest (ROIs) were placed on parent vessels (PVs) and hyperemic target vessels (TVs) before and after GAE. For each ROI, peak intensity (PI), time to arrival (TTA), and area under the curve (AUC) were computed and compared between PV and TV. Volume of embolic administered was correlated with adverse events.

RESULTS

No change was seen in PI, TTA, and AUC in the PV after GAE. Reduction in AUC (1,495.7 ± 521.5 vs 1,667.4 ± 574.0; P << .01) and PI (195.1 ± 43.8 vs 224.3 ± 49.2; P << .01) with increase in TTA (3.42 s ± 1.70 vs 1.92 s ± 1.45; P << .01) within the TV were observed after GAE. Median follow-up time was 89 days (range, 21-254 days). Reduction in clinical symptoms was also noted based on the Western-Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index total and pain scale at 1 month (total, 42.9% ± 23.0; pain, 54.4% ± 9.8; P << .01) and 3 months (total, 42.5% ± 14.9; pain, 57.8% ± 10.6; P << .01). Eight total mild adverse events (minor/self-limiting) were noted per Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines. A larger volume of embolic was observed in knees with skin changes (3.4 mL ± 0.4 vs 1.7 mL ± 0.4; P << .001). Furthermore, all skin changes were seen with embolic volumes >3.0 mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantification of intraprocedural perfusion changes with GAE demonstrated reduced flow to the TV with maintained flow in the PV and acceptable clinical outcomes. A potential relationship between embolic volume and nontarget embolization was also highlighted.

摘要

目的

使用参数分析,对使用定性描述的“修剪”技术进行的关节内动脉栓塞(GAE)过程中的灌注变化进行量化。

材料与方法

共对 12 名患者的 36 条单侧 GAE 血管进行了研究。在栓塞的 36 条血管中,有 34 条在栓塞前和栓塞后分别在母血管(PV)和充血靶血管(TV)上放置了感兴趣区域(ROI)。对于每个 ROI,计算并比较了 PV 和 TV 的峰值强度(PI)、到达时间(TTA)和曲线下面积(AUC)。栓塞体积与不良事件相关。

结果

栓塞后,PV 的 PI、TTA 和 AUC 没有变化。在 TV 中,AUC(1,495.7 ± 521.5 比 1,667.4 ± 574.0;P <<.01)和 PI(195.1 ± 43.8 比 224.3 ± 49.2;P <<.01)减少,而 TTA(3.42 s ± 1.70 比 1.92 s ± 1.45;P <<.01)增加,观察到栓塞后 TV 内的 AUC(1,495.7 ± 521.5 比 1,667.4 ± 574.0;P <<.01)和 PI(195.1 ± 43.8 比 224.3 ± 49.2;P <<.01)减少。中位随访时间为 89 天(范围 21-254 天)。根据 Western-Ontario 和 McMaster 大学关节炎指数的总分和疼痛评分,在 1 个月(总分,42.9% ± 23.0%;疼痛,54.4% ± 9.8%;P <<.01)和 3 个月(总分,42.5% ± 14.9%;疼痛,57.8% ± 10.6%;P <<.01)时,临床症状也有所改善。根据介入放射学会的指南,共观察到 8 例总轻度不良事件(轻微/自限性)。在膝关节皮肤改变的患者中,观察到的栓塞体积较大(3.4 mL ± 0.4 比 1.7 mL ± 0.4;P <<.001)。此外,所有皮肤改变均发生在栓塞体积大于 3.0 mL 的情况下。

结论

GAE 术中灌注变化的定量分析显示,TV 血流减少,而 PV 血流保持不变,临床结果可接受。还强调了栓塞体积与非目标栓塞之间的潜在关系。

相似文献

1
Quantifying Change in Perfusion after Genicular Artery Embolization with Parametric Analysis of Intraprocedural Digital Subtraction Angiograms.定量分析术中数字减影血管造影参数评估关节支动脉栓塞后灌注变化。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023 Dec;34(12):2190-2196. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.08.041. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
2
Added Value of Cone-Beam CT to Identify Arterial Supply during Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Osteoarthritis.锥形束 CT 在膝关节骨性关节炎关节内动脉栓塞术中识别动脉供血的增值作用。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023 Nov;34(11):1861-1867. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.07.033. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
3
Evaluation of perfusion changes using a 2D Parametric Parenchymal Blood Flow technique with automated vessel suppression following partial spleen embolization in patients with hypersplenism and portal hypertension.采用二维参数实质血流技术评估部分脾栓塞术后伴脾功能亢进和门静脉高压患者的灌注变化,同时进行自动血管抑制。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 19;100(7):e24783. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024783.
4
A Quantitative Digital Subtraction Angiography Technique for Characterizing Reduction in Hepatic Arterial Blood Flow During Transarterial Embolization.一种定量数字减影血管造影技术,用于描述经动脉栓塞治疗期间肝动脉血流减少的情况。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Feb;44(2):310-317. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02640-0. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Two-year outcomes comparing Embosphere® microspheres versus Imipenem Cilastatin for genicular artery embolization in patients with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis.比较 Embosphere®微球与亚胺培南西司他丁用于中重度膝骨关节炎患者膝关节动脉栓塞的 2 年疗效。
Knee. 2023 Mar;41:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.12.008. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
6
[Efficacy analysis of selective genicular artery embolization in the treatment of knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis].[选择性膝下动脉栓塞术治疗骨关节炎继发膝关节疼痛的疗效分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Mar 22;102(11):795-800. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210926-02166.
7
GAUCHO - Trial Genicular Artery Embolization Using Imipenem/Cilastatin vs. Microsphere for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.高乔人——使用亚胺培南/西司他丁与微球治疗膝骨关节炎的关节内动脉栓塞试验:一项随机对照试验。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Jul;45(7):903-910. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03089-z. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
8
Genicular Artery Embolization for Primary Knee Osteoarthritis.膝部动脉栓塞术治疗原发性膝关节骨关节炎
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2022 Jun 30;39(2):125-129. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1745798. eCollection 2022 Apr.
9
The Value of Preprocedural MR Imaging in Genicular Artery Embolization for Patients with Osteoarthritic Knee Pain.术前 MRI 成像在膝关节骨性关节炎疼痛患者膝关节动脉栓塞术中的价值。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Dec;31(12):2043-2050. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
10
Genicular Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis.膝下动脉栓塞术治疗症状性膝关节骨关节炎
JB JS Open Access. 2021 Oct 21;6(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00085. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Genicular Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques and Clinical Outcomes.用于症状性膝关节骨关节炎的膝动脉栓塞术:技术与临床结果的综合综述
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Sep 16. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-04188-3.
2
One- and Two-Year Outcomes of Genicular Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study Using 200-µm Polyethylene Glycol Microspheres.症状性膝关节骨关节炎的膝动脉栓塞术的1年和2年疗效:一项使用200微米聚乙二醇微球的单中心回顾性研究
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-04163-y.
3
Prognostication of Three-Month Genicular Artery Embolization Outcomes Using Pre-Procedural MRIs.
使用术前磁共振成像预测三个月膝动脉栓塞结果
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-04159-8.
4
Road to Genicular Artery Embolization: Importance of the Anastomotic Network.膝下动脉栓塞之路:吻合网络的重要性。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-04121-8.
5
Knee pain improvement after genicular artery embolization for the management of knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 studies.膝关节骨性关节炎行膝关节内动脉栓塞治疗后膝关节疼痛改善的系统评价和荟萃分析:21 项研究的更新
Radiologie (Heidelb). 2024 Nov;64(Suppl 1):32-46. doi: 10.1007/s00117-024-01388-9. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
6
Quantitative Comparison of Color-Coded Parametric Imaging Technologies Based on Digital Subtraction and Digital Variance Angiography: A Retrospective Observational Study.基于数字减法和数字方差血管造影的彩色编码参数成像技术的定量比较:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Imaging. 2024 Oct 18;10(10):260. doi: 10.3390/jimaging10100260.
7
Genicular Artery Embolization: Embolic Material and Imaging Review.膝动脉栓塞术:栓塞材料与影像学综述
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2024 Aug 19;41(3):246-251. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788029. eCollection 2024 Jun.