• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特朗普效应?加拿大的右翼民粹主义与对邮寄投票的不信任

The Trump Effect? Right-Wing Populism and Distrust in Voting by Mail in Canada.

作者信息

Wu Cary, Dawson Andrew

机构信息

York Research Chair and Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, York University, Glendon Campus, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Public Opin Q. 2024 Jul 16;88(SI):781-813. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae020. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1093/poq/nfae020
PMID:39109093
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11300042/
Abstract

Do Donald Trump's attacks on voting by mail influence how some Canadians view mail-in ballots? The Trump effect on views and behaviors surrounding voting by mail has been well documented in the United States. North of the border, more Canadians than ever voted by mail in the last general election. In this study, we consider how right-wing populism is associated with trust in voting by mail among Canadians. Specifically, we seek to test two main hypotheses. First, we consider whether Canadians holding populist views-and, in particular, those holding right-wing populist views (would-be Trump supporters)-are less trusting of voting by mail. Second, we consider whether political media exposure amplifies this association. We analyze data from both the 2021 Canadian Election Study and Democracy Checkup Survey. We find that those who hold populist views clearly have less trust in voting by mail. This is especially true among right-leaning individuals. Furthermore, as in the United States, this effect is moderated by one's level of political media exposure, with higher levels of political media exposure amplifying the effect of populist views on trust in voting by mail. Our findings, therefore, suggest that the politicization of mail-in voting by President Trump has important implications for the legitimacy of the electoral system not only in the United States, but also in Canada and potentially in other parts of the world.

摘要

唐纳德·特朗普对邮寄投票的攻击会影响一些加拿大人对邮寄选票的看法吗?特朗普对围绕邮寄投票的观点和行为的影响在美国已有充分记录。在边境以北,在上次大选中,通过邮寄投票的加拿大人比以往任何时候都多。在这项研究中,我们探讨右翼民粹主义与加拿大人对邮寄投票的信任之间的关联。具体而言,我们试图检验两个主要假设。首先,我们考虑持有民粹主义观点的加拿大人,尤其是那些持有右翼民粹主义观点的人(潜在的特朗普支持者)是否对邮寄投票的信任度较低。其次,我们考虑政治媒体曝光是否会强化这种关联。我们分析了2021年加拿大选举研究和民主检查调查的数据。我们发现,持有民粹主义观点的人显然对邮寄投票的信任度较低。在倾向于右翼的个人中尤其如此。此外,与美国一样,这种影响会因个人的政治媒体曝光程度而有所缓和,政治媒体曝光程度越高,民粹主义观点对邮寄投票信任度的影响就越大。因此,我们的研究结果表明,特朗普总统将邮寄投票政治化不仅对美国的选举制度合法性有重要影响,对加拿大乃至世界其他地区也可能有重要影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/bbfdfe59e781/nfae020f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/ea3797de290a/nfae020f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/966058e370c3/nfae020f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/d720376ec731/nfae020f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/71b994ae9b8c/nfae020f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/d217c7915cac/nfae020f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/d4c4926ffa47/nfae020f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/f0bfb65da906/nfae020f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/a11199b2cecc/nfae020f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/f2221fbf0c72/nfae020f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/bbfdfe59e781/nfae020f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/ea3797de290a/nfae020f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/966058e370c3/nfae020f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/d720376ec731/nfae020f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/71b994ae9b8c/nfae020f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/d217c7915cac/nfae020f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/d4c4926ffa47/nfae020f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/f0bfb65da906/nfae020f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/a11199b2cecc/nfae020f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/f2221fbf0c72/nfae020f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d29a/11300042/bbfdfe59e781/nfae020f10.jpg

相似文献

1
The Trump Effect? Right-Wing Populism and Distrust in Voting by Mail in Canada.特朗普效应?加拿大的右翼民粹主义与对邮寄投票的不信任
Public Opin Q. 2024 Jul 16;88(SI):781-813. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae020. eCollection 2024.
2
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
3
Populism and Support for Protectionism: The Relevance of Opposition to Trade Openness for Leftist and Rightist Populist Voting in The Netherlands.民粹主义与对保护主义的支持:在荷兰,反对贸易开放对左右翼民粹主义投票的相关性。
Polit Stud (Oxf). 2018 Aug;66(3):560-576. doi: 10.1177/0032321717723505. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
4
In Suspense: Donald Trump's Efforts to Undermine Public Trust in Democracy.悬念重重:唐纳德·特朗普破坏公众对民主信任的种种行径
Society. 2020;57(5):527-533. doi: 10.1007/s12115-020-00526-y. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
5
The role of economic uncertainty in the rise of EU populism.经济不确定性在欧盟民粹主义兴起中的作用。
Public Choice. 2022;190(1-2):229-246. doi: 10.1007/s11127-021-00933-7. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
6
When do people prefer dominant over prestigious political leaders?人们在什么时候更喜欢占主导地位的政治领导人而非有声望的政治领导人?
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Mar 1;3:e16. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.12. eCollection 2021.
7
"I feel it in my gut:" Epistemic Motivations, Political Beliefs, and Misperceptions of COVID-19 and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.“我凭直觉感觉到:”认知动机、政治信仰以及对新冠疫情和2020年美国总统大选的误解
J Soc Polit Psychol. 2022;10(2):643-656. doi: 10.5964/jspp.7823. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
8
American hybrid: Donald Trump and the strange merger of populism and plutocracy.美国怪胎:唐纳德·特朗普和民粹主义与财阀政治的奇异融合。
Br J Sociol. 2017 Nov;68 Suppl 1:S105-S119. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12323.
9
Nail in the Coffin or Lifeline? Evaluating the Electoral Impact of COVID-19 on President Trump in the 2020 Election.棺材上的钉子还是生命线?评估新冠疫情对特朗普总统在2020年大选中的选举影响。
Polit Behav. 2022 Oct 23:1-29. doi: 10.1007/s11109-022-09826-x.
10
Destructive populism as "perverted containing": A psychoanalytical look at the attraction of Donald Trump.作为“扭曲遏制”的破坏性民粹主义:对唐纳德·特朗普吸引力的精神分析审视
Int J Psychoanal. 2020 Oct;101(5):971-991. doi: 10.1080/00207578.2020.1827955.

引用本文的文献

1
Audits of the 2020 American election show an accurate vote count.对2020年美国大选的审计显示计票准确。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 May 20;122(20):e2419633122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2419633122. Epub 2025 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
How did absentee voting affect the 2020 U.S. election?缺席投票如何影响2020年美国大选?
Sci Adv. 2021 Dec 24;7(52):eabk1755. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abk1755. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
2
The achilles heel of democracy? A macro cross-national assessment of the correlates of state legitimacy.民主的致命弱点?对国家合法性相关因素的宏观跨国评估。
Soc Sci Res. 2021 Jul;97:102574. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102574. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
3
Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis.
逻辑斯蒂回归还是线性回归?使用回归分析估计二分类结局的实验处理的因果效应
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Apr;150(4):700-709. doi: 10.1037/xge0000920. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
4
America's electorate is increasingly polarized along partisan lines about voting by mail during the COVID-19 crisis.在美国 COVID-19 危机期间,通过邮件投票的问题上,美国选民越来越两极分化,党派立场鲜明。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 6;117(40):24640-24642. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008023117. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
5
The participatory and partisan impacts of mandatory vote-by-mail.强制邮寄投票的参与性和党派性影响。
Sci Adv. 2020 Aug 26;6(35):eabc7685. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc7685. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
Universal vote-by-mail has no impact on partisan turnout or vote share.普遍的邮寄选票对党派投票率或选票份额没有影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 23;117(25):14052-14056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007249117. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
7
Who Votes by Mail?: A Dynamic Model of the Individual-Level Consequences of Voting-by-Mail Systems.谁通过邮件投票?:投票邮寄系统对个人层面影响的动态模型。
Public Opin Q. 2001 Summer;65(2):178-97. doi: 10.1086/322196.