Liston E H
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1979 Jun;167(6):329-36. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197906000-00001.
The more recent literature addressing the clinical phenomenology of presenile dementia is reviewed. This survey, spanning approximately the past 4 decades and comprising a large number of articles in scientific journals, reveals that reported epidemiological data, symptoms and signs, and results of ancillary tests often vary widely from study to study, especially as regards findings of history and of mental status and neurological examinations. There is considerable indication that diagnostic specificity in presenile dementia in the absence of pathological examination of the brain by tissue biopsy or at autopsy may not be as reliable as is generally thought to be the case. The observed problems with interstudy agreement are discussed and are seen to be due in large measure to methodological inconsistency and nonuniformity. Areas of difficulties in methods are identified and guidelines for subsequent, needed clinical studies are suggested.
本文回顾了关于早老性痴呆临床现象学的近期文献。这项涵盖了大约过去40年、包含科学期刊上大量文章的综述表明,所报告的流行病学数据、症状和体征以及辅助检查结果在不同研究之间往往差异很大,尤其是在病史、精神状态和神经学检查的结果方面。有相当多的迹象表明,在没有通过组织活检或尸检对大脑进行病理检查的情况下,早老性痴呆的诊断特异性可能不像人们普遍认为的那样可靠。文中讨论了研究间一致性方面观察到的问题,并认为这些问题在很大程度上是由于方法上的不一致和不统一造成的。确定了方法上的困难领域,并提出了后续所需临床研究的指导方针。