• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用奥culus和Metrovision视野计对青光眼患者进行视野测量的比较。

Comparison of Visual Field Measurements in Glaucomatous Eyes using Oculus and Metrovision Perimeters.

作者信息

Daneshvar Ramin, Ehsaei Asieh, Moghadas Sharif Nasrin, Pato Zahra

机构信息

Eye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Refractive Errors Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

J Curr Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 11;35(1):17-22. doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_197_22. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.

DOI:10.4103/joco.joco_197_22
PMID:37680285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10481978/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the agreement between the Oculus and Metrovision perimeters in the visual field evaluation of glaucoma patients.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 41 consecutive glaucoma patients were enrolled. After detailed clinical examinations, visual field testing was performed for all patients using the Oculus and Metrovision perimeters. The interval time between the two visual field examinations was 30 min.

RESULTS

A total of 22 participants were male (53.7%) and the mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 58.6 ± 9.1 years. The absolute average of the mean deviation (MD) in the oculus perimeter (8.24 ± 4.92 dB) was higher compared to the Metrovision perimeter (4.02 ± 4.62; < 0.001). This difference was also evident in the Bland-Altman graph. The loss variance (pattern SD) values of Oculus perimeter (28.58 ± 16.40) and Metrovision perimeter (28.10 ± 28.45) were not significantly different; although based on the Bland-Altman plots in the lower MDs, the agreement is better and the data dispersion is lower, and in the higher MDs, the agreement is lower. The parameters of four visual field quadrants were also compared and showed poor correlations ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The Oculus and Metrovision perimeter devices have good agreement in lower MDs; however, they cannot be used interchangeably.

摘要

目的

研究Oculus视野计和Metrovision视野计在青光眼患者视野评估中的一致性。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,连续纳入了41例青光眼患者。在进行详细的临床检查后,使用Oculus视野计和Metrovision视野计对所有患者进行视野测试。两次视野检查的间隔时间为30分钟。

结果

共有22名参与者为男性(53.7%),平均年龄±标准差(SD)为58.6±9.1岁。与Metrovision视野计(4.02±4.62;<0.001)相比,Oculus视野计中平均偏差(MD)的绝对平均值(8.24±4.92 dB)更高。这种差异在Bland-Altman图中也很明显。Oculus视野计(28.58±16.40)和Metrovision视野计(28.10±28.45)的损失方差(模式标准差)值无显著差异;尽管根据较低MD值的Bland-Altman图,一致性更好且数据离散度更低,而在较高MD值时,一致性较低。还比较了四个视野象限的参数,结果显示相关性较差(<0.001)。

结论

Oculus视野计和Metrovision视野计在较低MD值时有良好的一致性;然而,它们不能互换使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d4/10481978/14affb8a84ef/JCO-35-17-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d4/10481978/ded38f85f94a/JCO-35-17-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d4/10481978/14affb8a84ef/JCO-35-17-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d4/10481978/ded38f85f94a/JCO-35-17-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d4/10481978/14affb8a84ef/JCO-35-17-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Visual Field Measurements in Glaucomatous Eyes using Oculus and Metrovision Perimeters.使用奥culus和Metrovision视野计对青光眼患者进行视野测量的比较。
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 11;35(1):17-22. doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_197_22. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
2
Retinal Sensitivity Thresholds Obtained Through Easyfield and Humphrey Perimeters in Eyes with Glaucoma: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.通过简易视野计和 Humphrey 视野计获得的青光眼患者视网膜敏感度阈值:一项横断面比较研究。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 2;14:4201-4207. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S280692. eCollection 2020.
3
Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study.多伦多便携式视野计与汉弗莱视野分析仪的多中心比较:一项初步研究。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 Mar-Apr;5(2):146-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
4
Comparison of imo and Humphrey field analyzer perimeters in glaucomatous eyes.青光眼患者眼中imo视野分析仪与汉弗莱视野分析仪周边视野的比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 18;14(12):1882-1887. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.12.11. eCollection 2021.
5
[Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].[使用Oculus Twinfield视野计测量白色视野与蓝黄色视野中青光眼半侧视野暗点的相关性]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2004 Feb;221(2):109-15. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-812854.
6
Virtual Reality-Based and Conventional Visual Field Examination Comparison in Healthy and Glaucoma Patients.虚拟现实与传统视野检查在健康人和青光眼患者中的比较。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Oct 4;10(12):10. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.12.10.
7
A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.《Compass 眼底周边仪与 Humphrey 视野分析仪的比较》
Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):242-251. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
8
Perimetric Comparison Between the IMOvifa and Humphrey Field Analyzer.IMOVIFA与Humphrey视野分析仪的视野计比较
J Glaucoma. 2023 Feb 1;32(2):85-92. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002134. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
9
Comparison of the Performance of a Novel, Smartphone-based, Head-mounted Perimeter (GearVision) With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.新型基于智能手机的头戴式周边视野计(GearVision)与 Humphrey 视野分析仪的性能比较。
J Glaucoma. 2021 Apr 1;30(4):e146-e152. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001797.
10
Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields.两种视野检查策略(SITA Fast和CLIP)在受损视野中阈值估计及学习效应的评估
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar-Apr;18(2):182-90. doi: 10.1177/112067210801800204.

引用本文的文献

1
Retinal Changes in Early-Onset cblC Methylmalonic Acidemia Identified Through Expanded Newborn Screening: Highlights from a Case Study and Literature Review.通过扩大新生儿筛查发现的早发型cblC型甲基丙二酸血症的视网膜变化:一项病例研究和文献综述的要点
Genes (Basel). 2025 May 25;16(6):635. doi: 10.3390/genes16060635.

本文引用的文献

1
Population-based glaucoma prevalence studies in Asians.亚洲人群的青光眼患病率研究。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul-Aug;59(4):434-47. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2013.09.003. Epub 2014 May 13.
2
A population-based survey of the prevalence and types of glaucoma in central Iran: the Yazd eye study.伊朗中部基于人群的青光眼患病率和类型的调查:亚兹德眼部研究。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Oct;120(10):1977-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.029. Epub 2013 May 9.
3
Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields.
两种视野检查策略(SITA Fast和CLIP)在受损视野中阈值估计及学习效应的评估
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar-Apr;18(2):182-90. doi: 10.1177/112067210801800204.
4
Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States.美国成年人中开角型青光眼的患病率。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):532-8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.532.
5
Comparison of different methods for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression.检测青光眼视野进展的不同方法比较。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Sep;44(9):3873-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-1171.
6
[Comparison of local differential luminance sensitivity (dls) between Oculus Twinfield Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer 630 (HFA I) in normal volunteers of varying ages].[不同年龄正常志愿者中Oculus Twinfield视野计与Humphrey视野分析仪630(HFA I)局部微分亮度敏感度(dls)的比较]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2001 Dec;218(12):782-94. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-19689.
7
Prevalence and causes of visual field loss in the elderly and associations with impairment in daily functioning: the Rotterdam Study.老年人视野缺损的患病率、病因及其与日常功能受损的关联:鹿特丹研究
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Dec;119(12):1788-94. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.12.1788.
8
Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry.频率加倍技术视野检查法与汉弗莱视野检查法的临床比较
Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Mar;85(3):360-2. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.3.360.
9
Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice.青光眼诊疗中倍频视野检查与Humphrey视野分析的比较
Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Mar;129(3):328-33. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00364-5.
10
Comparison of conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry in a prospective study of patients with glaucoma and healthy controls.青光眼患者与健康对照者前瞻性研究中传统视野检查与高通分辨率视野检查的比较。
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999 Jan;117(1):24-33. doi: 10.1001/archopht.117.1.24.