• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry.频率加倍技术视野检查法与汉弗莱视野检查法的临床比较
Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Mar;85(3):360-2. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.3.360.
2
Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice.倍频技术、趋势导向视野检查法及Humphrey瑞典交互式阈值算法快速视野检查法在青光眼诊疗中的敏感性和特异性
Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Mar;133(3):327-32. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01424-6.
3
A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects.Humphrey视野计与频率加倍视野计用于检测视交叉视野缺损的比较。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov-Dec;15(6):739-45.
4
Comparison of the frequency doubling technology screening algorithm and the Humphrey 24-2 SITA-FAST in a large eye screening.在大规模眼部筛查中频率加倍技术筛查算法与Humphrey 24-2 SITA-FAST的比较
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb;30(1):8-14. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2002.00478.x.
5
Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only a visual field test using frequency-doubling technology perimetry.仅使用频率加倍技术视野计进行视野测试的青光眼群体筛查的效果。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct;134(4):529-37. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01684-7.
6
Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry.使用频率加倍技术和达马托视野计筛查青光眼。
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999 Nov;117(11):1479-84. doi: 10.1001/archopht.117.11.1479.
7
Test-retest variability in glaucoma patients tested with C-20-1 screening-mode frequency doubling technology perimetry.采用C-20-1筛查模式频率加倍技术视野检查法对青光眼患者进行重测的变异性。
J Glaucoma. 2004 Aug;13(4):273-7. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200408000-00003.
8
Glaucoma progression detection with frequency doubling technology (FDT) compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP) in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study.在格罗宁根纵向青光眼研究中,与标准自动视野计(SAP)相比,使用频率加倍技术(FDT)检测青光眼进展情况。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 Sep;37(5):594-601. doi: 10.1111/opo.12401.
9
Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology.使用频率加倍技术筛查方案识别青光眼相关视野异常。
Am J Ophthalmol. 1998 Jun;125(6):819-29. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00046-4.
10
Clinical evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry using the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 threshold strategy.采用Humphrey Matrix 24-2阈值策略的频率加倍技术视野检查的临床评估
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Aug;89(8):1031-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.057778.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Visual Field Measurements in Glaucomatous Eyes using Oculus and Metrovision Perimeters.使用奥culus和Metrovision视野计对青光眼患者进行视野测量的比较。
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 11;35(1):17-22. doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_197_22. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
2
Combining Optical Coherence Tomography and Fundus Photography to Improve Glaucoma Screening.结合光学相干断层扫描和眼底摄影以改善青光眼筛查。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 27;12(5):1100. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051100.
3
Should clinical automated perimetry be considered for routine functional assessment of early/intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD)? A systematic review of current literature.临床自动化视野计是否应考虑用于早期/中期年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的常规功能评估?对当前文献的系统回顾。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Jan;42(1):161-177. doi: 10.1111/opo.12919. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
4
Development of a new algorithm based on FDT Matrix perimetry and SD-OCT to improve early glaucoma detection in primary care.基于频率翻倍技术视野检查(FDT Matrix)和频域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)开发一种新算法,以改善基层医疗中青光眼的早期检测。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 27;13:33-42. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S177581. eCollection 2019.
5
Comparison of frequency doubling and flicker defined form perimetry in early glaucoma.早期青光眼的倍频视野检查与闪烁视标定量视野检查的比较
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 May;254(5):937-46. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3286-1. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
6
Meta-analysis of the diagnostic efficiency of frequency-doubling technology for primary glaucoma.倍频技术对原发性青光眼诊断效能的Meta分析
Front Med China. 2007 Feb;1(1):109-14. doi: 10.1007/s11684-007-0021-7.
7
[Sensitivity and specificity of flicker perimetry with Pulsar. Comparison with achromatic (white-on-white) perimetry in glaucoma patients].[使用脉冲星进行闪烁视野计检查的敏感性和特异性。与青光眼患者的消色差(白对白)视野计检查的比较]
Ophthalmologe. 2013 Feb;110(2):141-5. doi: 10.1007/s00347-012-2693-x.
8
[Conventional perimetry. Antiquated or indispensable for functional glaucoma diagnostics?].[传统视野检查法。对于青光眼功能诊断而言是过时了还是不可或缺?]
Ophthalmologe. 2012 Apr;109(4):325-36. doi: 10.1007/s00347-012-2543-x.
9
Frequency doubling technique perimetry and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in patients with early glaucoma.频域加倍技术视野检查和光谱域光学相干断层扫描在早期青光眼患者中的应用。
Eye (Lond). 2011 Jan;25(1):17-29. doi: 10.1038/eye.2010.155. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
10
The distribution of visual field defects per quadrant in standard automated perimetry as compared to frequency doubling technology perimetry.标准自动视野计与频率加倍技术视野计中各象限视野缺损的分布情况比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;30(6):683-9. doi: 10.1007/s10792-010-9400-1. Epub 2010 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice.青光眼诊疗中倍频视野检查与Humphrey视野分析的比较
Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Mar;129(3):328-33. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00364-5.
2
Algorithm for interpreting the results of frequency doubling perimetry.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Mar;129(3):323-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00399-2.
3
Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.用于检测青光眼性视野缺损的倍频技术视野检查法
Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Mar;129(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00414-6.
4
Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry.使用频率加倍技术和达马托视野计筛查青光眼。
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999 Nov;117(11):1479-84. doi: 10.1001/archopht.117.11.1479.
5
Testing for glaucoma with the frequency-doubling illusion in the whole, macular and eccentric visual fields.利用全视野、黄斑视野和旁中心视野的倍频错觉检测青光眼。
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jun-Aug;27(3-4):194-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1606.1999.00195.x.
6
Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24--2 stimulus presentation pattern.使用24-2刺激呈现模式的倍频技术视野检查法。
Optom Vis Sci. 1999 Aug;76(8):571-81. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199908000-00026.
7
Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.青光眼患者和正常受试者中倍频视野检查和传统视野检查的重测变异性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Mar;40(3):648-56.
8
Frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma early diagnosis.倍频视野检查法在青光眼早期诊断中的应用
Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 1998(227):23-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1998.tb00869.x.
9
Clinical classification of glaucomatous visual field loss by frequency doubling perimetry.
Am J Ophthalmol. 1998 Jun;125(6):830-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00047-6.
10
Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology.使用频率加倍技术筛查方案识别青光眼相关视野异常。
Am J Ophthalmol. 1998 Jun;125(6):819-29. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00046-4.

频率加倍技术视野检查法与汉弗莱视野检查法的临床比较

Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry.

作者信息

Casson R, James B, Rubinstein A, Ali H

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Mar;85(3):360-2. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.3.360.

DOI:10.1136/bjo.85.3.360
PMID:11222348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1723884/
Abstract

AIM

To determine the number of missed points on frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry that optimise the sensitivity and specificity of the test and to determine the topographical accuracy of the test in a clinical setting.

METHODS

In a prospective study, the perimetric data from 99 patients who underwent both FDT perimetry in the screening mode and Humphrey 24-2 (H24-2) were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the FDT perimetry compared with the full threshold H24-2 as the gold standard.

RESULTS

Missed points on the FDT perimetry correlated with both the mean deviation and the corrected pattern standard deviation on the Humphrey perimetry. A score assigned to abnormal points on the FDT perimetry and the Humphrey total deviation plot showed a significant correlation for both the location and the depth of the defect. In comparing the Humphrey hemifield test with the FDT perimetry results, if at least one missed point on the frequency doubling test was considered as abnormal then the overall sensitivity of the test was 78.1% and the specificity was 89.1%.

CONCLUSION

FDT perimetry in the screening mode performed in a clinical setting was highly specific, exhibited reasonable sensitivity, and accurately determined the location and depth of scotomas when compared with the full threshold Humphrey 24-2.

摘要

目的

确定频率加倍技术(FDT)视野检查中能优化检测灵敏度和特异性的漏诊点数,并在临床环境中确定该检测的地形学准确性。

方法

在一项前瞻性研究中,采用99例患者的视野检查数据,这些患者均接受了筛查模式下的FDT视野检查和Humphrey 24-2(H24-2)视野检查,以全阈值H24-2作为金标准来确定FDT视野检查的灵敏度和特异性。

结果

FDT视野检查中的漏诊点与Humphrey视野检查中的平均偏差和校正模式标准差均相关。FDT视野检查中异常点的评分与Humphrey总偏差图上的缺陷位置和深度均显示出显著相关性。在比较Humphrey半视野检查与FDT视野检查结果时,如果将频率加倍试验中至少一个漏诊点视为异常,则该检测的总体灵敏度为78.1%,特异性为89.1%。

结论

在临床环境中进行的筛查模式下的FDT视野检查具有高度特异性,表现出合理的灵敏度,与全阈值Humphrey 24-2相比,能准确确定暗点的位置和深度。