• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血流限制训练对大鼠骨转换标志物、微结构和生物力学的影响。

Effects of blood flow restriction training on bone turnover markers, microstructure, and biomechanics in rats.

机构信息

Jiangsu Province "Sports and Health Project" Collaborative Innovation Center, Nanjing Sport Institute, Nanjing, China.

Department of Sports and Health Sciences, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 21;14:1194364. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1194364. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fendo.2023.1194364
PMID:37680889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10482404/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to investigate the effects of blood flow restriction training on muscle strength, bone tissue structure material, and biomechanical properties in rats applying various exercise interventions and to analyze the process by identifying the bone turnover markers, it provides a theoretical basis for the application of BFRT in clinical rehabilitation.

METHODS

A total of 24, 3-month-old male SD (Sprague Dawley) rats were randomly divided into pressurized control group (CON, n=6), low-intensity training group (LIRT, n=6), high-intensity training group (HIRT, n=6), and blood flow restriction training group (LIBFR, n=6) for 8-week ladder-climbing exercises. The pressured control group were given only ischemia treatments and did not undertake any burden. The low-intensity training group was allowed to climb the ladder with 30% of the maximum voluntary carrying capacity (MVCC). The rats in the high-intensity training group were allowed to climb the ladder with 70% MVCC. The blood flow restriction training group climbed the ladder with 30% MVCC while imposing blood flow restriction. Before sampling, the final MVCC was measured using a ladder-climbing protocol with progressively increasing weight loading. The serum, muscle, and bone were removed for sampling. The concentrations of the bone turnover markers PINP, BGP, and CTX in the serum were measured using ELISA. The bone mineral density and microstructure of femur bones were measured using micro-CT. Three-point bending and torsion tests were performed by a universal testing machine to measure the material mechanics and structural mechanics indexes of the femur bone.

RESULTS

The results of maximum strength test showed that the MVCC in LIRT, HIRT, and LIBFR groups was significantly greater than in the CON group, while the MVCC in the HIRT group was significantly higher than that in the LIRT group (P<0.05). According to the results of the bone turnover marker test, the concentrations of bone formation indexes PINP (amino-terminal extension peptide of type I procollagen) and BGP (bone gla protein) were significantly lower in the CON group than in the HIRT group (P<0.01), while those were significantly higher in the LIRT group compared to the HIRT group (P<0.01). In terms of bone resorption indexes, significant differences were identified only between the HIRT and other groups (P<0.05). The micro-CT examination revealed that the HIRT group had significantly greater bone density index values than the CON and LIRT groups (P<0.05). The results of three-point bending and torsion test by the universal material testing machine showed that the elastic modulus and maximum load indexes of the HIRT group were significantly smaller than those of the LIBFR group (P<0.05). The fracture load indexes in the HIRT group were significantly smaller than in the LIBFR group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

  1. LIRT, HIRT, LIBFR, and CON all have significant differences, and this training helps to improve maximum strength, with HIRT being the most effective. 2. Blood flow restriction training can improve the expression of bone turnover markers, such as PINP and BGP, which promote bone tissue formation. 3. Blood flow restriction training can improve muscle strength and increase the positive development of bone turnover markers, thereby improving bone biomechanical properties such as bone elastic modulus and maximum load.
摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨血流限制训练对不同运动干预大鼠肌肉力量、骨组织结构材料和生物力学性能的影响,并通过鉴定骨转换标志物来分析其过程,为 BFRT 在临床康复中的应用提供理论依据。

方法

将 24 只 3 月龄雄性 SD(Sprague Dawley)大鼠随机分为加压对照组(CON,n=6)、低强度训练组(LIRT,n=6)、高强度训练组(HIRT,n=6)和血流限制训练组(LIBFR,n=6),进行 8 周的爬梯运动。加压对照组仅接受缺血处理,不进行任何负重。低强度训练组允许以 30%最大自愿携带能力(MVCC)的负荷爬梯。高强度训练组允许以 70%MVCC 的负荷爬梯。血流限制训练组以 30%MVCC 爬梯,同时施加血流限制。在采样前,采用逐渐增加负重的爬梯方案测量最终 MVCC。取出血清、肌肉和骨骼进行采样。采用 ELISA 法测定血清中骨转换标志物 PINP(I 型前胶原氨基端延长肽)、BGP(骨 gla 蛋白)的浓度。采用微 CT 测量股骨的骨密度和骨微结构。采用万能试验机进行三点弯曲和扭转试验,测量股骨的材料力学和结构力学指标。

结果

最大强度测试结果显示,LIRT、HIRT 和 LIBFR 组的 MVCC 明显高于 CON 组,而 HIRT 组的 MVCC 明显高于 LIRT 组(P<0.05)。根据骨转换标志物检测结果,CON 组骨形成标志物 PINP(I 型前胶原氨基端延长肽)和 BGP(骨 gla 蛋白)的浓度明显低于 HIRT 组(P<0.01),而 LIRT 组明显高于 HIRT 组(P<0.01)。在骨吸收标志物方面,仅在 HIRT 组与其他组之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。微 CT 检查显示,HIRT 组的骨密度指数值明显大于 CON 和 LIRT 组(P<0.05)。万能材料试验机三点弯曲和扭转试验结果表明,HIRT 组的弹性模量和最大载荷指标明显小于 LIBFR 组(P<0.05)。HIRT 组的骨折载荷指标明显小于 LIBFR 组(P<0.05)。

结论

  1. LIRT、HIRT、LIBFR 和 CON 均有显著差异,这种训练有助于提高最大力量,其中 HIRT 最为有效。2. 血流限制训练可以提高骨转换标志物的表达,如 PINP 和 BGP,从而促进骨组织形成。3. 血流限制训练可以提高肌肉力量,增加骨转换标志物的积极发展,从而提高骨弹性模量和最大载荷等骨生物力学性能。
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5775/10482404/f6d14fef1e12/fendo-14-1194364-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5775/10482404/66e891887a0f/fendo-14-1194364-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5775/10482404/b2854c0e5797/fendo-14-1194364-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5775/10482404/3321696b776b/fendo-14-1194364-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5775/10482404/35e5085ee827/fendo-14-1194364-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5775/10482404/7e28ed21f1e9/fendo-14-1194364-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5775/10482404/0a36c728b600/fendo-14-1194364-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5775/10482404/f6d14fef1e12/fendo-14-1194364-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5775/10482404/66e891887a0f/fendo-14-1194364-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5775/10482404/b2854c0e5797/fendo-14-1194364-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5775/10482404/3321696b776b/fendo-14-1194364-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5775/10482404/35e5085ee827/fendo-14-1194364-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5775/10482404/7e28ed21f1e9/fendo-14-1194364-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5775/10482404/0a36c728b600/fendo-14-1194364-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5775/10482404/f6d14fef1e12/fendo-14-1194364-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of blood flow restriction training on bone turnover markers, microstructure, and biomechanics in rats.血流限制训练对大鼠骨转换标志物、微结构和生物力学的影响。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 21;14:1194364. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1194364. eCollection 2023.
2
Effect of blood flow restriction during low-intensity resistance training on bone markers and physical functions in postmenopausal women.低强度抗阻训练期间血流限制对绝经后女性骨标志物和身体功能的影响。
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2021 Jan;19(1):57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
3
Low-Intensity Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction Increases Muscle Strength without Altering hsCRP and Fibrinogen Levels in Healthy Subjects.健康受试者进行低强度血流限制运动可增加肌肉力量,且不改变hsCRP和纤维蛋白原水平。
Chin J Physiol. 2018 Jun;61(3):188-195. doi: 10.4077/CJP.2018.BAG567.
4
Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training on Autonomic and Endothelial Function in Persons with Parkinson's Disease.血流限制阻力训练对帕金森病患者自主神经和内皮功能的影响。
J Parkinsons Dis. 2024;14(4):761-775. doi: 10.3233/JPD-230259.
5
The effects of low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction versus traditional resistance exercise on lower extremity muscle strength and motor functionin ischemic stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial.低强度抗阻训练联合血流限制与传统抗阻运动对缺血性脑卒中幸存者下肢肌肉力量和运动功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2024 May;31(4):418-429. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2023.2259170. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
6
Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Therapy for Muscular Strength, Hypertrophy, and Endurance in Healthy and Special Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血流限制疗法对健康和特殊人群肌肉力量、肥大和耐力的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin J Sport Med. 2022 Sep 1;32(5):531-545. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000991. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
7
Effects of a 16-week progressive high-intensity strength training (HIST) on indexes of bone turnover in men over 65 years: a randomized controlled study.16周渐进式高强度力量训练(HIST)对65岁以上男性骨转换指标的影响:一项随机对照研究。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2001 Dec;24(11):882-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03343946.
8
High versus Low-Intensity Resistance Training on Bone Mineral Density and Content Acquisition by Postmenopausal Women with Osteopenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.高强度与低强度抗阻训练对骨质减少的绝经后女性骨密度和骨量获取的影响:一项随机对照试验
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023 Nov 22;37:126. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.37.126. eCollection 2023.
9
Early effects of ovariectomy on bone microstructure, bone turnover markers and mechanical properties in rats.去卵巢对大鼠骨微结构、骨转换标志物和力学性能的早期影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Apr 2;23(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05265-1.
10
The effects of resistance training with blood flow restriction on muscle strength, muscle hypertrophy and functionality in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review with meta-analysis.抗阻训练联合血流限制对骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎患者肌肉力量、肌肉肥大和功能的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 10;16(11):e0259574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259574. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood flow restriction training in microgravity: a review of multisystem physiological benefits and implementation challenges for long-duration space missions.微重力环境下的血流限制训练:长期太空任务的多系统生理益处及实施挑战综述
NPJ Microgravity. 2025 Aug 7;11(1):53. doi: 10.1038/s41526-025-00515-7.
2
Effects of low-intensity blood flow restriction training on myocardial injury indices, antioxidant and anti-apoptotic capacity in rats.低强度血流限制训练对大鼠心肌损伤指标、抗氧化及抗凋亡能力的影响
Front Physiol. 2025 Mar 17;16:1508305. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1508305. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Knee Loading With Blood Flow Restriction Can Enhance Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty.血流限制下的膝关节负荷可增强全膝关节置换术后的恢复。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 20;15(4):e37895. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37895. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Higher bone remodeling biomarkers are related to a higher muscle function in older adults: Effects of acute exercise.骨转换标志物水平较高与老年人肌肉功能较高有关:急性运动的影响。
Bone. 2022 Dec;165:116545. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116545. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
3
Effects of high-intensity interval training in more or less active mice on biomechanical, biophysical and biochemical bone parameters.
高强度间歇训练对更活跃或不那么活跃的小鼠的生物力学、生物物理和生化骨参数的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 19;11(1):6414. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85585-9.
4
Short-term Resistance Training Increases APPL1 Content in the Liver and the Insulin Sensitivity of Mice Fed a Long-term High-fat Diet.短期抗阻训练可增加长期高脂饮食喂养小鼠肝脏中的APPL1含量及胰岛素敏感性。
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2020 Jan;128(1):30-37. doi: 10.1055/a-0885-9872. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
5
The world-wide burden of musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic analysis of the World Health Organization Burden of Diseases Database.世界范围内肌肉骨骼疾病的负担:对世界卫生组织疾病负担数据库的系统分析。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(6):844-848. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215142. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
6
Acute effects of strength exercise with blood flow restriction on vascular function of young healthy males.血流限制下力量训练对年轻健康男性血管功能的急性影响。
J Vasc Bras. 2018 Apr-Jun;17(2):122-127. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.011017.
7
Low-Intensity Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction Increases Muscle Strength without Altering hsCRP and Fibrinogen Levels in Healthy Subjects.健康受试者进行低强度血流限制运动可增加肌肉力量,且不改变hsCRP和纤维蛋白原水平。
Chin J Physiol. 2018 Jun;61(3):188-195. doi: 10.4077/CJP.2018.BAG567.
8
High-Impact Mechanical Loading Increases Bone Material Strength in Postmenopausal Women-A 3-Month Intervention Study.高负荷机械加载增加绝经后妇女的骨材料强度:一项为期 3 个月的干预研究。
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Jul;33(7):1242-1251. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3431. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
9
Training with blood flow restriction. Mechanisms, gain in strength and safety.血流限制训练。机制、力量增长及安全性。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2015 May;55(5):446-56. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
10
Interaction between Muscle and Bone.肌肉与骨骼之间的相互作用。
J Bone Metab. 2014 Feb;21(1):29-40. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2014.21.1.29. Epub 2014 Feb 28.