Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, The Affiliated Second Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China.
Department of Microsurgery, University of South China, Hengyang Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, Hengyang, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 8;102(36):e34665. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034665.
Flavonoids have been shown to be beneficial in a variety of inflammatory and metabolic diseases because of their anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. However, previous epidemiological studies have only demonstrated a negative correlation between flavonoid intake on inflammatory markers, and the optimal intake of dietary flavonoids and subclasses in terms of dietary anti-inflammatory efficacy remains undetermined. This study was based on 3 cycles (2007-2010, 2017-2018) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the corresponding expanded flavonoid database. Weighted multiple linear regression was used to assess linear relationships between flavonoid intake and Dietary inflammation index (DII). Smoothed curve fit and a generalized additive model were used to investigate the nonlinear relationships and threshold effects, the 2-tailed linear regression model was used to find potential inflection points. A total of 12,724 adults were included in the study. After adjusting for potential confounders, flavonoid intake was significantly associated with DII, with the strongest negative association effect for flavonols (-0.40 [-0.45, -0.35]). In subgroup analyses stratified by sex, race, age, body mass index, education levels, and diabetes, flavonol intake maintained a significant negative linear correlation with DII. In addition, we found significant nonlinear relationships (L-shaped relationships) and threshold effects between total flavonoids, flavan-3-ols, and flavanols and DII, with inflection points of 437.65 mg/days, 157.79 mg/days, and 46.36 mg/days, respectively. Our results suggest a threshold for the dietary anti-inflammatory capacity of flavonoid intake in U.S. adults.
类黄酮因其具有抗炎和抗氧化特性,已被证明对多种炎症性和代谢性疾病有益。然而,先前的流行病学研究仅表明类黄酮摄入量与炎症标志物之间存在负相关,而关于饮食抗炎功效的最佳类黄酮和亚类摄入量仍未确定。本研究基于美国国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)的 3 个周期(2007-2010 年、2017-2018 年)及相应的扩展类黄酮数据库。采用加权多重线性回归评估类黄酮摄入量与饮食炎症指数(DII)之间的线性关系。采用平滑曲线拟合和广义加性模型探讨非线性关系和阈值效应,采用双侧线性回归模型寻找潜在拐点。共有 12724 名成年人纳入研究。在调整潜在混杂因素后,类黄酮摄入量与 DII 显著相关,其中黄酮醇的负相关效应最强(-0.40[-0.45,-0.35])。在按性别、种族、年龄、体重指数、教育程度和糖尿病分层的亚组分析中,黄酮醇摄入量与 DII 仍保持显著的负线性相关性。此外,我们发现总类黄酮、黄烷-3-醇和黄烷醇与 DII 之间存在显著的非线性关系(L 型关系)和阈值效应,拐点分别为 437.65mg/d、157.79mg/d 和 46.36mg/d。我们的研究结果提示美国成年人摄入类黄酮的饮食抗炎能力存在阈值。