• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创溶栓颅内血肿清除术治疗脑出血:一项随机对照试验的贝叶斯再分析。

Minimally Invasive Surgery With Thrombolysis for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation: Bayesian Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

From the Department of Neurosurgery (A.T.B., T.P., J.T., F.S.V.), and Center for Health Data Science and Analytics (A.P.P., G.B., F.S.V.), Houston Methodist, TX; Weill Cornell Medical College (G.B., F.S.V.), New York, NY; Houston Methodist Academic Institute (G.B., F.S.V.), TX; Division of Brain Injury Outcomes (W.C.Z., D.H.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; and Department of Neurological Surgery (I.A.), University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, IL.

出版信息

Neurology. 2023 Oct 17;101(16):e1614-e1622. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207735. Epub 2023 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000207735
PMID:37684058
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10585679/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Bayesian analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can extend the value of trial data beyond interpretations based on conventional value-based binary cutoffs. We conducted an exploratory post hoc Bayesian reanalysis of the minimally invasive surgery with thrombolysis for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) evacuation (MISTIE-3) trial and derived probabilities of potential intervention effect on functional and survival outcomes.

METHODS

MISTIE-3 was a multicenter phase 3 RCT designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the MISTIE intervention. Five hundred and six adults (18 years or older) with spontaneous, nontraumatic, supratentorial ICH of ≥30 mL were randomized to receive either the MISTIE intervention (n = 255) or standard medical care (n = 251). We provide Bayesian-derived estimates of the effect of the MISTIE intervention on achieving a good 365-day modified Rankin Scale score (mRS score 0-3) as relative risk (RR) and absolute risk difference (ARD), and the probabilities that these treatment effects are greater than prespecified thresholds. We used 2 sets of prior distributions: (1) reference priors, including minimally informative, enthusiastic, and skeptical priors, and (2) data-derived prior distribution, using a hierarchical random effects model. We additionally evaluated the potential effects of the MISTIE intervention on 180-day and 30-day mRS and 365-, 180-, and 30-day mortality using data-derived priors.

RESULTS

The Bayesian-derived probability that MISTIE intervention has any beneficial effect (RR >1) on achieving a good 365-day mRS score was 70% using minimally informative prior, 87% with enthusiastic prior, 68% with skeptical prior, and 73% with data-derived prior. However, these probabilities were ≤55% for RR >1.10 and 0% for RR >1.52 across a range of priors. The probabilities of achieving RR >1 for 180- and 30-day mRS scores are 65% and 80%, respectively. Furthermore, the probabilities of achieving RR <1 for 365-, 180-, and 30-day mortality are 93%, 98%, and 99%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Our exploratory analyses indicate that across a range of priors, the Bayesian-derived probability of MISTIE intervention having any beneficial effect on 365-day mRS for patients with ICH is between 68% and 87%. These analyses do not change the frequentist-based interpretation of the trial. However, unlike the frequentist values, which indirectly evaluate treatment effects and only provide an arbitrary binary cutoff (such as 0.05), the Bayesian framework directly estimates the probabilities of potential treatment effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01827046.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) + recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) does not significantly improve functional outcome in patients with ICH. However, this study lacks the precision to exclude a potential benefit of MIS + rt-PA.

摘要

背景与目的

贝叶斯分析随机对照试验(RCT)可以扩展试验数据的价值,超出基于传统价值的二元截止值的解释范围。我们对微创血肿清除术(MISTIE)试验进行了最小侵入性手术与溶栓治疗脑出血(ICH)清除的探索性事后贝叶斯重新分析,并得出了潜在干预对功能和生存结果的影响的概率。

方法

MISTIE-3 是一项多中心 3 期 RCT,旨在评估 MISTIE 干预的疗效和安全性。506 名成年人(18 岁或以上)自发性、非外伤性、幕上 ICH 容积≥30ml 被随机分为接受 MISTIE 干预(n=255)或标准医疗护理(n=251)。我们提供了贝叶斯估计的 MISTIE 干预对实现 365 天改良 Rankin 量表评分(mRS 评分 0-3)的效果的估计,即相对风险(RR)和绝对风险差异(ARD),以及这些治疗效果大于预定阈值的概率。我们使用了 2 组先验分布:(1)参考先验分布,包括最小信息量、热情和怀疑先验分布,以及(2)使用分层随机效应模型的数据衍生先验分布。我们还使用数据衍生的先验分布评估了 MISTIE 干预对 180 天和 30 天 mRS 和 365 天、180 天和 30 天死亡率的潜在影响。

结果

使用最小信息量先验,贝叶斯估计的 MISTIE 干预对实现良好 365 天 mRS 评分的任何有益效果(RR>1)的概率为 70%,使用热情先验为 87%,使用怀疑先验为 68%,使用数据衍生先验为 73%。然而,这些概率对于 RR>1.10 和 RR>1.52 均小于 55%。对于 RR>1.10 和 RR>1.52,365 天和 180 天 mRS 评分的 RR>1 的概率分别为 65%和 80%。此外,对于 RR<1.00,365 天、180 天和 30 天死亡率的概率分别为 93%、98%和 99%。

讨论

我们的探索性分析表明,在一系列先验分布中,贝叶斯估计的 MISTIE 干预对 ICH 患者 365 天 mRS 的任何有益效果的概率在 68%至 87%之间。这些分析没有改变基于频率的试验解释。然而,与间接评估治疗效果的频率值不同,这些值只提供任意的二元截止值(如 0.05),贝叶斯框架直接估计潜在治疗效果的概率。

试验注册信息

ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01827046。

证据分类

本研究提供了 II 级证据,表明微创血肿清除术(MIS)+重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)不能显著改善 ICH 患者的功能结局。然而,本研究缺乏排除 MIS+rt-PA 潜在益处的精度。

相似文献

1
Minimally Invasive Surgery With Thrombolysis for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation: Bayesian Reanalysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.微创溶栓颅内血肿清除术治疗脑出血:一项随机对照试验的贝叶斯再分析。
Neurology. 2023 Oct 17;101(16):e1614-e1622. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207735. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
2
Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery with thrombolysis in intracerebral haemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE III): a randomised, controlled, open-label, blinded endpoint phase 3 trial.微创血肿清除术与溶栓治疗脑出血的疗效和安全性(MISTIE III):一项随机、对照、开放标签、盲终点 3 期试验。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 9;393(10175):1021-1032. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30195-3. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
3
Intracerebral Hemorrhage Volume Reduction and Timing of Intervention Versus Functional Benefit and Survival in the MISTIE III and STICH Trials.颅内出血体积减少与干预时机对 MISTIE III 和 STICH 试验的功能获益和生存的影响。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Apr 15;88(5):961-970. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa572.
4
Surgical Performance Determines Functional Outcome Benefit in the Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation (MISTIE) Procedure.手术表现决定了微创手术联合重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗脑出血清除术(MISTIE)的功能结局获益。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Jun 1;84(6):1157-1168. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz077.
5
Does stereotactic thrombolysis with alteplase for intracerebral haemorrhage alter intraventricular haematoma volume? A secondary analysis of the MISTIE-III trial.立体定向溶栓联合阿替普酶治疗脑出血是否会改变脑室内血肿体积?MISTIE-III 试验的二次分析。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 17;95(10):892-898. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-333032.
6
Thrombolysis for Evacuation of Intracerebral and Intraventricular Hemorrhage: A Guide to Surgical Protocols With Practical Lessons Learned From the MISTIE and CLEAR Trials.用于清除脑内和脑室内出血的溶栓治疗:手术方案指南及从MISTIE和CLEAR试验中获得的实践经验教训
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020 Dec 15;20(1):98-108. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa306.
7
A randomized 500-subject open-label phase 3 clinical trial of minimally invasive surgery plus alteplase in intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE III).一项随机、500 例、开放性标签、3 期临床试验,评估微创手术联合阿替普酶在脑出血清除术中的应用(MISTIE III)。
Int J Stroke. 2019 Jul;14(5):548-554. doi: 10.1177/1747493019839280. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
8
Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery plus alteplase in intracerebral haemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2 trial.微创手术联合阿替普酶用于脑出血清除的安全性和有效性(MISTIE):一项随机、对照、开放标签的2期试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Nov;15(12):1228-1237. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30234-4. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
9
Minimally invasive evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using sonothrombolysis.采用声溶栓微创清除自发性脑出血。
J Neurosurg. 2011 Sep;115(3):592-601. doi: 10.3171/2011.5.JNS10505. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
10
One-Year Outcome Trajectories and Factors Associated with Functional Recovery Among Survivors of Intracerebral and Intraventricular Hemorrhage With Initial Severe Disability.脑出血和脑室出血幸存者初始严重残疾后功能恢复的一年结局轨迹及相关因素。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Sep 1;79(9):856-868. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.1991.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive surgery for bilateral large basal ganglia hemorrhage: a rare case report and insights from literature.双侧基底节区大量出血的微创手术:1例罕见病例报告及文献见解
AME Case Rep. 2025 Jul 15;9:103. doi: 10.21037/acr-25-17. eCollection 2025.
2
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Review.自发性脑出血的微创手术:综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 11;14(4):1155. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041155.
3
Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Keep It Simple.脑出血:化繁为简。
Stroke. 2024 Dec;55(12):2942-2945. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048533. Epub 2024 Oct 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Intracerebral and Intraventricular Hemorrhage.微创治疗脑内及脑室内出血手术
Front Neurol. 2022 Feb 22;13:755501. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.755501. eCollection 2022.
2
A Bayesian perspective on Biogen's aducanumab trial.贝叶斯视角下百健公司的 aducanumab 试验
Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Nov;18(11):2341-2351. doi: 10.1002/alz.12615. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
3
Minimally Invasive Surgery in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.脑出血患者的微创手术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2022 Jan 13;12:789757. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.789757. eCollection 2021.
4
Prior Elicitation for Use in Clinical Trial Design and Analysis: A Literature Review.预先征求意见在临床试验设计和分析中的应用:文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 13;18(4):1833. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041833.
5
Bayesian survival analysis for early detection of treatment effects in phase 3 clinical trials.用于三期临床试验中治疗效果早期检测的贝叶斯生存分析。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Jan 9;21:100709. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100709. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Bayesian Statistics for Surgical Decision Making.贝叶斯统计在外科决策中的应用。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021 Aug;22(6):620-625. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.391. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
7
Using Bayesian Methods to Augment the Interpretation of Critical Care Trials. An Overview of Theory and Example Reanalysis of the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial.使用贝叶斯方法增强重症监护试验的解释。理论概述和急性呼吸窘迫综合征试验肺泡复张的实例再分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;203(5):543-552. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2381CP.
8
Clinical trials in critical care: can a Bayesian approach enhance clinical and scientific decision making?危重病临床研究:贝叶斯方法能否增强临床和科学决策?
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Feb;9(2):207-216. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30471-9. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
9
Surgical decision making in the setting of severe traumatic brain injury: A survey of neurosurgeons.严重创伤性脑损伤情况下的手术决策:神经外科医生调查。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0228947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228947. eCollection 2020.
10
Effects of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status versus Serum Lactate Levels among Patients with Septic Shock. A Bayesian Reanalysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Trial.以外周灌注状态为目标的复苏策略与脓毒性休克患者血清乳酸水平的影响。ANDROMEDA-SHOCK 试验的贝叶斯再分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb 15;201(4):423-429. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201905-0968OC.