Department of Psychology & Sociology, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Dr., unit 5827, Corpus Christi, TX, 78412, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 9;23(1):1753. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16635-2.
In general, people tend to support private breastfeeding more than public breastfeeding, and discomfort surrounding public breastfeeding may contribute to sub-optimal rates of breastfeeding in the United States. Few studies have systematically examined situational factors that contribute to (negative) reactions to public breastfeeding. It is unclear whether the physical location or the presence of others is more influential in shaping people's evaluations of public breastfeeding. This study aimed to experimentally investigate the influence of location, bystander presence, bystander gender, and the breastfeeding woman's use of a cover on people's evaluations of breastfeeding images.
A sample of adults residing in the United States was randomly assigned to view an image of a breastfeeding woman in an experimental study that examined four independent variables: breastfeeding location (public vs. private), bystander presence (present vs. not present), gender of bystander (male vs. female), and use of a cover (cover vs. no cover). Participants then reported their emotional reactions to, perceptions of, and behavioral intentions toward the breastfeeding woman. In addition, participants completed measures of sexism, traditional gender role endorsement, sexual comfort, body gaze, and breastfeeding knowledge and experience.
Hierarchical regressions revealed no differences between private and public breastfeeding images. Perceptions of the breastfeeding woman were more favorable when she was alone than with others, and when she was covered than when she was not covered. Evaluations tended to be more favorable among participants who scored lower on hostile sexism, higher on benevolent sexism, higher on sexual comfort, and higher on breastfeeding knowledge.
The presence of bystanders may be more consequential than the physical location in shaping reactions to public breastfeeding. These findings can be applied to improve support for public breastfeeding, which may contribute to higher breastfeeding rates and the associated public health benefits.
一般来说,人们倾向于更支持私人场合的母乳喂养,而公众场合母乳喂养所带来的不适可能导致美国母乳喂养率不理想。很少有研究系统地考察了导致公众场合母乳喂养负面反应的情境因素。人们对公众场合母乳喂养的评价是受物理位置还是周围是否有人的影响,这一点仍不清楚。本研究旨在通过实验来调查位置因素的影响,包括地点、旁观者的存在、旁观者的性别以及哺乳女性使用覆盖物对人们对母乳喂养图片的评价的影响。
本研究在美国随机抽取了一组成年人作为样本,他们参与了一项实验研究,研究考察了四个独立变量:母乳喂养地点(公共场合与私人场合)、旁观者的存在(在场与不在场)、旁观者的性别(男性与女性)和使用覆盖物(使用与不使用)。然后,参与者报告了他们对母乳喂养女性的情绪反应、看法和行为意向。此外,参与者还完成了性别歧视、传统性别角色认同、性舒适度、身体注视和母乳喂养知识与经验的测量。
分层回归显示,私人场合和公共场合的母乳喂养图片之间没有差异。当哺乳女性独自一人时,而非与他人在一起时,以及当她使用覆盖物时,而非不使用覆盖物时,对她的看法更为有利。评价倾向于对敌对性别歧视得分较低、仁慈性别歧视得分较高、性舒适度较高和母乳喂养知识较高的参与者更为有利。
旁观者的存在可能比物理位置更能影响对公众场合母乳喂养的反应。这些发现可应用于改善对公众场合母乳喂养的支持,这可能有助于提高母乳喂养率,并带来相关的公共卫生益处。