Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Berlin, Germany.
Trials. 2023 Sep 9;24(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07610-8.
Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs), also known as tumor conferences, are a cornerstone of cancer treatments. However, barriers such as incomplete patient information or logistical challenges can postpone tumor board decisions and delay patient treatment, potentially affecting clinical outcomes. Therapeutic Assistance and Decision algorithms for hepatobiliary tumor Boards (ADBoard) aims to reduce this delay by providing automated data extraction and high-quality, evidence-based treatment recommendations.
With the help of natural language processing, relevant patient information will be automatically extracted from electronic medical records and used to complete a classic tumor conference protocol. A machine learning model is trained on retrospective MDM data and clinical guidelines to recommend treatment options for patients in our inclusion criteria. Study participants will be randomized to either MDM with ADBoard (Arm A: MDM-AB) or conventional MDM (Arm B: MDM-C). The concordance of recommendations of both groups will be compared using interrater reliability. We hypothesize that the therapy recommendations of ADBoard would be in high agreement with those of the MDM-C, with a Cohen's kappa value of ≥ 0.75. Furthermore, our secondary hypotheses state that the completeness of patient information presented in MDM is higher when using ADBoard than without, and the explainability of tumor board protocols in MDM-AB is higher compared to MDM-C as measured by the System Causability Scale.
The implementation of ADBoard aims to improve the quality and completeness of the data required for MDM decision-making and to propose therapeutic recommendations that consider current medical evidence and guidelines in a transparent and reproducible manner.
The project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (trial identifying number: NCT05681949; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05681949 ) on 12 January 2023.
多学科团队会议(MDM),也称为肿瘤会议,是癌症治疗的基石。然而,由于患者信息不完整或后勤挑战等障碍,肿瘤委员会的决策可能会被推迟,从而延迟患者的治疗,这可能会影响临床结果。肝胆肿瘤委员会的治疗辅助和决策算法(ADBoard)旨在通过自动提取数据和提供高质量、基于证据的治疗建议来减少这种延迟。
借助自然语言处理,相关的患者信息将从电子病历中自动提取,并用于完成经典的肿瘤会议协议。一个机器学习模型在回顾性 MDM 数据和临床指南上进行训练,以针对符合纳入标准的患者推荐治疗方案。研究参与者将被随机分配到 MDM 加 ADBoard(A 组:MDM-AB)或常规 MDM(B 组:MDM-C)。通过组内一致性来比较两组建议的一致性。我们假设 ADBoard 的治疗建议与 MDM-C 的建议高度一致,Cohen's kappa 值≥0.75。此外,我们的次要假设是,与没有 ADBoard 相比,使用 ADBoard 时 MDM 中呈现的患者信息更完整,并且通过系统因果量表衡量,MDM-AB 中的肿瘤委员会协议的可解释性更高。
ADBoard 的实施旨在提高 MDM 决策所需数据的质量和完整性,并以透明和可重复的方式提出考虑当前医学证据和指南的治疗建议。
该项目已获得柏林夏里特医科大学伦理委员会的批准。
该研究于 2023 年 1 月 12 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册(试验识别号:NCT05681949;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05681949)。