• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牛奶质量概念化:对消费者、农民和加工专家观点的系统综述。

Milk Quality Conceptualization: A Systematic Review of Consumers', Farmers', and Processing Experts' Views.

作者信息

Castellini Greta, Barello Serena, Bosio Albino Claudio

机构信息

EngageMinds HUB-Consumer, Food & Health Engagement Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy.

Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Bissolati, 74, 26100 Cremona, Italy.

出版信息

Foods. 2023 Aug 26;12(17):3215. doi: 10.3390/foods12173215.

DOI:10.3390/foods12173215
PMID:37685148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10486532/
Abstract

Milk consumption has traditionally been recognized as a fundamental element of global dietary patterns due to its perceived nutritional advantages. Nonetheless, a substantial decrease in milk consumption has been identified within diverse populations in recent times. Specifically, consumers' expectations and representations of milk quality have undergone notable transformations, contributing to the observed reduction in consumption. The objective of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive examination and categorization of the conceptual attributes associated with milk quality, considering the representations of citizen-consumers, farmers, and processing experts. This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The titles and abstracts of 409 articles were screened, and 20 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. The results demonstrate the existence of a dual articulation in the conceptual definition of milk quality. Farmers and processing experts exhibited a relatively similar representation of milk quality, focusing on technical indicators. In contrast, citizen-consumers held more simplistic and subjective concepts that are challenging to quantify. This study emphasized the critical need for establishing a platform for communication and knowledge exchange to foster shared representations and expectations regarding milk quality.

摘要

由于其被认为具有的营养优势,传统上牛奶消费一直被视为全球饮食模式的一个基本要素。然而,近年来在不同人群中已发现牛奶消费量大幅下降。具体而言,消费者对牛奶质量的期望和认知发生了显著变化,这导致了观察到的消费量下降。本系统综述的目的是考虑公民消费者、农民和加工专家的认知,对与牛奶质量相关的概念属性进行全面审查和分类。本综述按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。筛选了409篇文章的标题和摘要,并评估了20篇全文文章的合格性。结果表明,牛奶质量的概念定义存在双重表述。农民和加工专家对牛奶质量的认知相对相似,侧重于技术指标。相比之下,公民消费者持有更简单和主观的概念,难以量化。本研究强调迫切需要建立一个沟通和知识交流平台,以促进对牛奶质量的共同认知和期望。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/0722325618fa/foods-12-03215-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/4a9992612254/foods-12-03215-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/d3198b17e23c/foods-12-03215-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/9292c0855194/foods-12-03215-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/e7cb9407c3e2/foods-12-03215-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/a8dbd84633ea/foods-12-03215-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/caa8ff719b7e/foods-12-03215-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/85795f058242/foods-12-03215-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/0722325618fa/foods-12-03215-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/4a9992612254/foods-12-03215-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/d3198b17e23c/foods-12-03215-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/9292c0855194/foods-12-03215-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/e7cb9407c3e2/foods-12-03215-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/a8dbd84633ea/foods-12-03215-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/caa8ff719b7e/foods-12-03215-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/85795f058242/foods-12-03215-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8402/10486532/0722325618fa/foods-12-03215-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Milk Quality Conceptualization: A Systematic Review of Consumers', Farmers', and Processing Experts' Views.牛奶质量概念化:对消费者、农民和加工专家观点的系统综述。
Foods. 2023 Aug 26;12(17):3215. doi: 10.3390/foods12173215.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Exploring Social Media to Understand Perceptions of Milk Quality among Farmers, Processors, and Citizen-Consumers.通过社交媒体了解奶农、加工商和公民消费者对牛奶质量的看法。
Foods. 2024 Aug 13;13(16):2526. doi: 10.3390/foods13162526.
4
Consumers' perceptions of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes as indicators of safety and quality of chicken meat: Actionable information for public health authorities and the chicken industry.消费者对鸡肉内在和外在属性的认知与鸡肉的安全性和质量:公共卫生当局和鸡肉行业的可操作信息。
J Food Sci. 2020 Jun;85(6):1845-1855. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15125. Epub 2020 May 29.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Understanding farmers' and veterinarians' behavior in relation to antimicrobial use and resistance in dairy cattle: A systematic review.理解奶牛养殖业中农民和兽医在使用和抗微生物药物方面的行为:系统综述。
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Apr;104(4):4584-4603. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19614. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
7
Factors affecting the purchase behaviour of farmers' markets consumers.影响农贸市场消费者购买行为的因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 30;16(7):e0255435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255435. eCollection 2021.
8
Quality Social Connection as an Active Ingredient in Digital Interventions for Young People With Depression and Anxiety: Systematic Scoping Review and Meta-analysis.质量社会联系作为一种活性成分在数字干预年轻人与抑郁和焦虑:系统范围审查和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 17;23(12):e26584. doi: 10.2196/26584.
9
Systematic Review of Factors Influencing Farmers' Market Use Overall and among Low-Income Populations.影响农贸市场总体使用情况及低收入人群使用情况的因素的系统评价
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Jul;116(7):1136-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
10
Emerging Parameters Justifying a Revised Quality Concept for Cow Milk.新兴参数证明了对牛奶质量概念进行修订的合理性。
Foods. 2024 May 25;13(11):1650. doi: 10.3390/foods13111650.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Heat Processing Effects on Cortisol Concentration in Dairy Milk Products.热处理对乳制品中皮质醇浓度的影响评估
Food Sci Anim Resour. 2024 Nov;44(6):1453-1461. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e36. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
2
Exploring Social Media to Understand Perceptions of Milk Quality among Farmers, Processors, and Citizen-Consumers.通过社交媒体了解奶农、加工商和公民消费者对牛奶质量的看法。
Foods. 2024 Aug 13;13(16):2526. doi: 10.3390/foods13162526.

本文引用的文献

1
Can dairy help solve the malnutrition crisis in developing countries? An economic analysis.乳制品能帮助解决发展中国家的营养不良危机吗?一项经济分析。
Anim Front. 2023 Feb 23;13(1):7-16. doi: 10.1093/af/vfac083. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Consumer attitudes toward dairy products from sheep and goats: A cross-continental perspective.消费者对绵羊和山羊乳制品的态度:跨大陆视角。
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Nov;105(11):8718-8733. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-21894. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
3
Evolution of Milk Consumption and Its Psychological Determinants: A Mini-Review.
牛奶消费的演变及其心理决定因素:一篇综述短文
Front Nutr. 2022 Feb 11;9:845154. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.845154. eCollection 2022.
4
Developing 'Smart' Dairy Farming Responsive to Farmers and Consumer-Citizens: A Review.发展对农民和公民消费者有响应的“智能”奶牛养殖:综述
Animals (Basel). 2022 Feb 2;12(3):360. doi: 10.3390/ani12030360.
5
Which Factors Drive Consumer Decisions during Milk Purchase? New Individuals' Profiles Considering Fresh Pasteurized and UHT Treated Milk.购买牛奶时,哪些因素会影响消费者的决策?考虑新鲜巴氏杀菌奶和超高温灭菌奶的新消费者概况。
Foods. 2021 Dec 29;11(1):77. doi: 10.3390/foods11010077.
6
Co-construction of a method for evaluating the intrinsic quality of bovine milk in relation to its fate.牛奶奶源品质与其命运关系的评价方法的共同构建。
Animal. 2021 Jul;15(7):100264. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100264. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
7
Feeding cows with hay, silage, or fresh herbage on pasture or indoors affects sensory properties and chemical composition of milk and cheese.用干草、青贮料或新鲜草料在牧场或室内喂养奶牛会影响牛奶和奶酪的感官特性和化学成分。
J Dairy Sci. 2021 May;104(5):5285-5302. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19738. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
8
Animal welfare information affects consumers' hedonic and emotional responses towards milk.动物福利信息会影响消费者对牛奶的享乐和情感反应。
Food Res Int. 2021 Mar;141:110006. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.110006. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
9
Consumer knowledge and perceptions of milk fat in Denmark, the United Kingdom, and the United States.丹麦、英国和美国消费者对牛奶脂肪的认知和看法。
J Dairy Sci. 2020 May;103(5):4151-4163. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17549. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
10
Consumer Understanding of Food Quality, Healthiness, and Environmental Impact: A Cross-National Perspective.消费者对食品质量、健康和环境影响的理解:跨国视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 25;17(1):169. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010169.