• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Ki-67标记指数在内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检诊断胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤中的诊断准确性

Diagnostic Accuracy of ki-67 Labeling Index in Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Biopsy of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

作者信息

Pyo Jung-Soo, Kim Nae Yu, Min Kyueng-Whan, Oh Il Hwan, Lim Dae Hyun, Son Byoung Kwan

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu-si 11759, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu-si 11759, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 25;13(17):2756. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172756.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13172756
PMID:37685294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10487187/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Ki-67 labeling index (LI) between endoscopic ultrasonography-fine-needle aspiration cytology/biopsy (EUS-FNAC/FNB) and surgical specimens of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs).

METHODS

Conventional meta-analysis and diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) reviews were performed on 17 eligible studies. The DTA review involved calculating the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (OR), and area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. In addition, subgroup analysis was conducted based on EUS-FNAC and FNB, tumor grade, and tumor size.

RESULTS

The overall concordance rate of WHO grade based on Ki-67 LI between the EUS-FNAC/FNB and the surgical specimen was 0.767 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.713-0.814). Concordance rates of the EUS-FNAC and EUS-FNB subgroups were 0.741 (95% CI, 0.681-0.794) and 0.839 (95% CI, 0.738-0.906), respectively. In the DTA review for grade 3, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated to be 0.786 (95% CI, 0.590-0.917) and 0.998 (95% CI, 0.987-1.000), respectively. The diagnostic OR and AUC of the SROC curve were 150.220 (95% CI, 46.145-489.000) and 0.983, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were observed to be highest in the grade 1 and 3 subgroups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher concordance of tumor grade based on Ki-67 LI was observed between EUS-FNAC/FNB and surgical specimens, indicating the potential usefulness of Ki-67 LI in predicting PanNEN tumor grade in EUS-FNAC/FNB.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较内镜超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学检查/活检(EUS-FNAC/FNB)与胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(PanNENs)手术标本中Ki-67标记指数(LI)的诊断准确性。

方法

对17项符合条件的研究进行传统的荟萃分析和诊断试验准确性(DTA)综述。DTA综述包括计算汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线的敏感性、特异性、诊断比值比(OR)和曲线下面积(AUC)。此外,还根据EUS-FNAC和FNB、肿瘤分级和肿瘤大小进行了亚组分析。

结果

EUS-FNAC/FNB与手术标本之间基于Ki-67 LI的WHO分级总体一致性率为0.767(95%置信区间(CI),0.713-0.814)。EUS-FNAC亚组和EUS-FNB亚组的一致性率分别为0.741(95%CI,0.681-0.794)和0.839(95%CI,0.738-0.906)。在3级的DTA综述中,敏感性和特异性分别计算为0.786(95%CI,0.590-0.917)和0.998(95%CI,0.987-1.000)。SROC曲线的诊断OR和AUC分别为150.220(95%CI,46.145-489.000)和0.983。在1级和3级亚组中,敏感性和特异性分别最高。

结论

EUS-FNAC/FNB与手术标本之间基于Ki-67 LI的肿瘤分级一致性较高,表明Ki-67 LI在EUS-FNAC/FNB中预测PanNEN肿瘤分级方面具有潜在用途。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dca/10487187/ce75290fc6a4/diagnostics-13-02756-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dca/10487187/ce75290fc6a4/diagnostics-13-02756-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dca/10487187/ce75290fc6a4/diagnostics-13-02756-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of ki-67 Labeling Index in Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Biopsy of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Ki-67标记指数在内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检诊断胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤中的诊断准确性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 25;13(17):2756. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172756.
2
Comparison between Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Preparation in Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Pancreatic Lesions.传统涂片与液基制片在胰腺病变内镜超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学检查中的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 May 9;10(5):293. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10050293.
3
Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy histology for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.EUS 引导下细针抽吸细胞学检查与 EUS 引导下细针活检组织学检查在胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤评估中的比较。
Pancreatology. 2021 Mar;21(2):443-450. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.12.015. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Core-Needle Biopsy in the Assessment of the Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer-A Meta-Analysis.细针穿刺细胞学检查和粗针活检在乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结评估中的诊断准确性——一项荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Sep 18;10(9):717. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090717.
5
A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸细胞学检查(EUS-FNA)与内镜超声引导下细针活检(EUS-FNB)对胰腺和非胰腺病变的诊断价值比较研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Jun 1;23(6):2151-2158. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.6.2151.
6
Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.在内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检时进行触摸印片细胞学检查,在评估胰腺实性病变方面,其样本质量和诊断率与标准内镜超声引导下细针抽吸标本相当。
Cytopathology. 2019 Mar;30(2):179-186. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12662. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
7
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术与内镜超声引导下细针活检术用于胰腺癌诊断的系统评价和Meta分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 25;12(12):2951. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122951.
8
Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy in upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors measuring 2-5 cm in size.内镜超声引导下细针活检对上消化道 2-5cm 大小的黏膜下肿瘤的诊断性能。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8060-8066. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09243-5. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
9
EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.超声内镜引导下反向斜面细针活检采样及实心胰腺病变开放式细针抽吸术——一项前瞻性比较研究
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Feb;53(2):231-237. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1421704. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
10
Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.用于内镜超声引导下实性胰腺肿块采样的粗针活检针与标准穿刺针:一项随机平行组研究。
Endoscopy. 2014 Dec;46(12):1056-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1377558. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Value of Cytology in Pancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: Accuracy in Common Epithelial Pancreatobiliary Tumors and the Role of Cell Block Analysis.细胞学检查在胰腺内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检中的诊断价值:常见上皮性胰胆肿瘤的诊断准确性及细胞块分析的作用
Iran J Pathol. 2025;20(1):98-107. doi: 10.30699/ijp.2024.2036290.3329. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
2
EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB in Pancreatic Solid Lesions ≤ 15 mm.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA)与超声内镜引导下细针切割活检(EUS-FNB)在直径≤15mm胰腺实性病变中的应用比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 15;14(4):427. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14040427.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA in the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms grading: Possible clinical impact of misclassification.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNA)在评估胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤分级中的诊断准确性:错误分类可能产生的临床影响。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2021 Sep-Oct;10(5):372-380. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-20-00261.
2
Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy histology for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.EUS 引导下细针抽吸细胞学检查与 EUS 引导下细针活检组织学检查在胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤评估中的比较。
Pancreatology. 2021 Mar;21(2):443-450. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.12.015. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
3
Grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using Ki-67 index and 2017 World Health Organization criteria: An analysis of 32 cases.
基于Ki-67指数和2017年世界卫生组织标准,在内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检中对胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤进行分级:32例分析
Cytojournal. 2020 Sep 18;17:21. doi: 10.25259/Cytojournal_4_2020. eCollection 2020.
4
Clinical relevance of performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors less than 2 cm.对于直径小于 2cm 的胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤,行内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检的临床意义。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;122(7):1393-1400. doi: 10.1002/jso.26158. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
5
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis and grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective analysis of 110 cases.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术诊断和分级胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤:110 例回顾性分析。
Endoscopy. 2020 Nov;52(11):988-994. doi: 10.1055/a-1180-8614. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
6
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy is superior to fine-needle aspiration in assessing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.在评估胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤方面,内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检优于细针抽吸活检。
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Oct;7(10):E1281-E1287. doi: 10.1055/a-0990-9611. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
7
Grading Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors by Ki-67 Index Evaluated on Fine-Needle Aspiration Cell Block Material.基于细针抽吸细胞块材料的 Ki-67 指数评估对胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤进行分级。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 Jan 1;153(1):74-81. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz110.
8
New Nodal Staging for Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-institutional and National Data Analysis.原发胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的新淋巴结分期:多机构和国家数据分析。
Ann Surg. 2021 Jul 1;274(1):e28-e35. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003478.
9
The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Ki67 in the Management of Non-Functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.内镜超声引导下Ki67在无功能性胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤管理中的作用
Clin Endosc. 2020 Mar;53(2):213-220. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.068. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
10
Resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: defining patterns and time course of recurrence.胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤切除术:复发模式和时间进程的定义。
HPB (Oxford). 2020 Feb;22(2):215-223. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.05.020. Epub 2019 Jun 21.