Vliek Sonja, Hilbers Florentine S, van Werkhoven Erik, Mandjes Ingrid, Kessels Rob, Kleiterp Sieta, Lips Esther H, Mulder Lennart, Kayembe Mutamba T, Loo Claudette E, Russell Nicola S, Vrancken Peeters Marie-Jeanne T F D, Holtkamp Marjo J, Schot Margaret, Baars Joke W, Honkoop Aafke H, Vulink Annelie J E, Imholz Alex L T, Vrijaldenhoven Suzan, van den Berkmortel Franchette W P J, Meerum Terwogt Jetske M, Schrama Jolanda G, Kuijer Philomeen, Kroep Judith R, van der Padt-Pruijsten Annemieke, Wesseling Jelle, Sonke Gabe S, Gilhuijs Kenneth G A, Jager Agnes, Nederlof Petra, Linn Sabine C
Department of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023 Sep 9;9(1):75. doi: 10.1038/s41523-023-00580-9.
Exploratory analyses of high-dose alkylating chemotherapy trials have suggested that BRCA1 or BRCA2-pathway altered (BRCA-altered) breast cancer might be particularly sensitive to this type of treatment. In this study, patients with BRCA-altered tumors who had received three initial courses of dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC), were randomized between a fourth ddAC course followed by high-dose carboplatin-thiotepa-cyclophosphamide or conventional chemotherapy (initially ddAC only or ddAC-capecitabine/decetaxel [CD] depending on MRI response, after amendment ddAC-carboplatin/paclitaxel [CP] for everyone). The primary endpoint was the neoadjuvant response index (NRI). Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). In total, 122 patients were randomized. No difference in NRI-score distribution (p = 0.41) was found. A statistically non-significant RFS difference was found (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.23-1.25; p = 0.15). Exploratory RFS analyses showed benefit in stage III (n = 35; HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.03-0.75), but not stage II (n = 86; HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.30-3.30) patients. For stage III, 4-year RFS was 46% (95% CI 24-87%), 71% (95% CI 48-100%) and 88% (95% CI 74-100%), for ddAC/ddAC-CD, ddAC-CP and high-dose chemotherapy, respectively. No significant differences were found between high-dose and conventional chemotherapy in stage II-III, triple-negative, BRCA-altered breast cancer patients. Further research is needed to establish if there are patients with stage III, triple negative BRCA-altered breast cancer for whom outcomes can be improved with high-dose alkylating chemotherapy or whether the current standard neoadjuvant therapy including carboplatin and an immune checkpoint inhibitor is sufficient. Trial Registration: NCT01057069.
对大剂量烷化剂化疗试验的探索性分析表明,BRCA1或BRCA2通路改变(BRCA改变)的乳腺癌可能对这类治疗特别敏感。在本研究中,接受了三个初始疗程剂量密集型阿霉素和环磷酰胺(ddAC)治疗的BRCA改变肿瘤患者,被随机分为两组,一组接受第四个ddAC疗程,随后接受大剂量卡铂-噻替派-环磷酰胺治疗,另一组接受传统化疗(最初仅接受ddAC或根据MRI反应接受ddAC-卡培他滨/多西他赛[CD],修订后所有人均接受ddAC-卡铂/紫杉醇[CP])。主要终点是新辅助反应指数(NRI)。次要终点包括无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)。总共122例患者被随机分组。未发现NRI评分分布有差异(p = 0.41)。发现RFS有统计学上无显著差异(HR 0.54;95%CI 0.23 - 1.25;p = 0.15)。探索性RFS分析显示,III期患者(n = 35;HR 0.16;95%CI 0.03 - 0.75)有获益,但II期患者(n = 86;HR 1.00;95%CI 0.30 - 3.30)没有。对于III期患者,ddAC/ddAC-CD、ddAC-CP和大剂量化疗的4年RFS分别为46%(95%CI 24 - 87%)、71%(95%CI 48 - 100%)和88%(95%CI 74 - 100%)。在II - III期、三阴性、BRCA改变的乳腺癌患者中,大剂量化疗和传统化疗之间未发现显著差异。需要进一步研究确定是否存在III期、三阴性BRCA改变的乳腺癌患者,大剂量烷化剂化疗可改善其预后,或者当前包括卡铂和免疫检查点抑制剂的标准新辅助治疗是否足够。试验注册号:NCT01057069。