• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估小儿 ACL 撕裂伤在线患者教育资料的可读性和质量。

Evaluating the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials for Pediatric ACL Tears.

机构信息

Florida State University College of Medicine.

University of South Florida College of Medicine, FL.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop. 2023 Oct 1;43(9):549-554. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002490. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000002490
PMID:37694607
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears increases in children, the internet has become a major source of information and education. In the United States, the average adult reads at about an eighth grade level. The National Institutes of Health recommends that patient education materials do not exceed a sixth-grade reading level. Therefore, the most accessed resources on the internet should be created with this in mind. The purpose of this study is to assess the readability and quality of online patient resources for pediatric ACL tears.

METHODS

Google was queried using the term "Pediatric ACL Tear" on May 26, 2022. The most popular sites were identified through page one of a Google search. All content was evaluated to assure information was directed toward patients. To determine reading difficulty, the most widely accepted readability tests: Flesch Reading Ease Index, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, and Gunning Fog Index were calculated through plain text in Microsoft Word and URL in online readability checker Readable.io.

RESULTS

The average grade level for all resources was above the recommended reading level based on both Microsoft Word and Readable.io calculations. Each source exceeded the NIH recommendation by 2.6 grade levels on average (Mean grade level readability was 8.6 ± 1.9). Four of the 6 sites were above the average US reading level, exceeding the eighth grade by an average of 1.5 grade levels. All 6 sites analyzed had a mean DISCERN score of 61.9, meeting the 'good quality' criteria.

CONCLUSION

The most readily available online materials for Pediatric ACL tears were of 'good quality' but above both the NIH-recommended readability level and the average US adult reading level. With the increasing need for treatment of ACL tears in pediatric and adolescent patients and greater internet accessibility in these populations, it is important to consider the readability of these resources in support of increased health literacy and improved outcomes.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

It is important for physicians treating young patients with ACL tears to be aware of all sources of information and support, including content shared online as these platforms are increasingly utilized, especially by patients and families of lower socioeconomic status.

摘要

背景

随着儿童前交叉韧带 (ACL) 撕裂的发生率增加,互联网已成为主要的信息和教育来源。在美国,成年人的平均阅读水平约为八年级。美国国立卫生研究院 (NIH) 建议,患者教育材料的阅读水平不应超过六年级。因此,应牢记这一点,创建互联网上最受欢迎的资源。本研究的目的是评估儿童 ACL 撕裂的在线患者资源的可读性和质量。

方法

于 2022 年 5 月 26 日在 Google 上使用术语“儿科 ACL 撕裂”进行搜索。通过 Google 搜索的第一页确定最受欢迎的网站。评估所有内容以确保信息面向患者。为了确定阅读难度,使用最广泛接受的可读性测试:Flesch 阅读舒适度指数、Flesch-Kincaid 年级水平和 Gunning Fog 指数,通过 Microsoft Word 中的纯文本和在线可读性检查器 Readable.io 中的 URL 进行计算。

结果

根据 Microsoft Word 和 Readable.io 的计算,所有资源的平均年级水平均高于推荐的阅读水平。每个来源的平均 NIH 推荐水平都高出 2.6 个年级(平均阅读水平为 8.6 ± 1.9)。6 个来源中有 4 个高于美国平均阅读水平,平均高出 1.5 个年级。所有 6 个分析的网站的平均 DISCERN 评分为 61.9,符合“质量好”的标准。

结论

儿科 ACL 撕裂最容易获得的在线材料质量好,但高于 NIH 推荐的可读性水平和美国成年人的平均阅读水平。随着儿科和青少年 ACL 撕裂治疗需求的增加以及这些人群对互联网的可及性增加,考虑这些资源的可读性以支持提高健康素养和改善结果非常重要。

临床相关性

治疗 ACL 撕裂的年轻患者的医生应了解所有信息和支持来源,包括在线共享的内容,因为这些平台越来越被使用,尤其是社会经济地位较低的患者及其家属。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials for Pediatric ACL Tears.评估小儿 ACL 撕裂伤在线患者教育资料的可读性和质量。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2023 Oct 1;43(9):549-554. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002490. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
2
Is Information About Musculoskeletal Malignancies From Large Language Models or Web Resources at a Suitable Reading Level for Patients?来自大语言模型或网络资源的关于肌肉骨骼恶性肿瘤的信息对患者来说是否处于合适的阅读水平?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):306-315. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003263. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
Can Artificial Intelligence Improve the Readability of Patient Education Materials?人工智能能否提高患者教育材料的可读性?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Nov 1;481(11):2260-2267. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002668. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
4
Readability of Written Materials for CKD Patients: A Systematic Review.CKD 患者阅读材料的易读性:系统评价。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jun;65(6):842-50. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.025. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
5
Readability analysis as a tool for evaluating English proficiency in first-year medical students.可读性分析作为评估一年级医学生英语水平的一种工具。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07348-8.
6
Enhancing the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Using Large Language Models: Cross-Sectional Study.使用大语言模型提高在线患者教育材料的可读性:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 4;27:e69955. doi: 10.2196/69955.
7
Readability and Quality of Online Information on Osteochondral Knee Injuries: An Objective Assessment.膝关节骨软骨损伤在线信息的可读性与质量:一项客观评估。
Cureus. 2025 May 29;17(5):e85014. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85014. eCollection 2025 May.
8
A joint effort: Evaluating the quality and readability of online resources relating to total hip arthroplasty.共同努力:评估与全髋关节置换术相关的在线资源的质量和可读性。
Surgeon. 2025 Aug;23(4):220-224. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2025.02.016. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
9
Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.眼科患者教育材料的可读性:一项单机构研究及系统评价
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 3;16:133. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0315-0.
10
Artificial Intelligence Shows Limited Success in Improving Readability Levels of Spanish-language Orthopaedic Patient Education Materials.人工智能在提高西班牙语骨科患者教育材料的可读性方面成效有限。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 11. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003413.

引用本文的文献

1
Source Characteristics Influence AI-Enabled Orthopaedic Text Simplification: Recommendations for the Future.源特征影响基于人工智能的骨科文本简化:对未来的建议。
JB JS Open Access. 2025 Jan 8;10(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00007. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
2
Information Needs of State-Level Asthma Programs: Recommendations to Increase Accessibility.州级哮喘项目的信息需求:提高可及性的建议
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 14;21(12):1670. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121670.
3
Assessing the Readability of Patient Education Materials on Cardiac Catheterization From Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.
评估人工智能聊天机器人提供的心脏导管插入术患者教育材料的可读性:一项观察性横断面研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 4;16(7):e63865. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63865. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Carpal Tunnel Surgery: Can Patients Read, Understand, and Act on Online Educational Resources?腕管综合征手术:患者能否阅读、理解和运用在线教育资源?
Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(1):47-58.