Pretoria, South Africa E-mail:
Psychoanal Rev. 2023 Sep;110(3):259-286. doi: 10.1521/prev.2023.110.3.259.
On the basis of a previous reading (Olver, 2023) of Freud's work that reveals a bisexuality thesis, the author discusses several interrelated consequences of this thesis, including the nature of desire and primal unity, a restatement of shame, the semiotic model, and the emergence of society and the economy with reference to the ego and the superego. These consequences together encapsulate and describe the dialectic of the subject. The author shows how dialectic movement is arrested by various acts of nomination, most notably the nomination of heterosexuality in the forms of sexual reproduction and financial profit that become social and economic master values in modernity. Only by keeping the dialectic open can the subject do justice to its inherent and revolutionary bisexual nature, not in the sense of transgression but rather in pursuit of the nonnomination that is the permanent of a dialectic self.
基于之前对弗洛伊德作品的阅读（Olver，2023），揭示了双性恋假说，作者讨论了这一假说的几个相互关联的后果，包括欲望和原始统一的本质、羞耻的重新表述、符号模型，以及参照自我和超我出现的社会和经济。这些后果共同包含并描述了主体的辩证法。作者展示了辩证法的运动是如何被各种提名行为所阻止的，特别是在性繁殖和金融利润形式中对异性恋的提名，这些在现代性中成为社会和经济的主要价值观。只有保持辩证法的开放性，主体才能公正对待其内在的和革命性的双性恋本质，不是在越轨的意义上，而是在追求非提名，这是辩证法自我的永久状态。
