• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于 COVID-19 个体风险评估工具的社区焦点小组:可及性、理解和有用性。

Community focus groups about a COVID-19 individual risk assessment tool: access, understanding and usefulness.

机构信息

Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.

, William & Mary, 101 Ukrop Way, Williamsburg, VA, 23186, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 11;23(1):1761. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16696-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-16696-3
PMID:37697247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10494421/
Abstract

To make informed COVID-19 related decisions, individuals need information about their personal risks and how those risks may vary with specific demographic and health characteristics. The Fight COVID Milwaukee web-based risk assessment tool allows for assessment of COVID-19 mortality risk as a function of personal and neighborhood characteristics. The purpose of this study is to explore public understanding of this risk assessment tool and risk perception through community focus groups. Individuals were recruited from the general adult population in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, USA, to participate in nine online focus groups where the risk assessment tool was presented for feedback. Three main themes were identified in the focus groups regarding the web-based risk assessment tool: some challenges in accessibility, variable ease of understanding, and personal usefulness but uncertain value for others. This paper explores how members of the community interpret individual risk assessments and life expectancy estimations, and how these vary with age, gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and pre-existing comorbidities.

摘要

为了做出明智的与 COVID-19 相关的决策,个人需要了解他们的个人风险,以及这些风险如何因特定的人口统计学和健康特征而有所不同。“抗击密尔沃基新冠病毒”网络风险评估工具允许评估 COVID-19 死亡率风险,作为个人和社区特征的函数。本研究的目的是通过社区焦点小组探讨公众对这种风险评估工具和风险认知的理解。参与者从美国威斯康星州密尔沃基县的一般成年人群中招募,参加了九个在线焦点小组,在这些小组中介绍了风险评估工具以征求反馈意见。在焦点小组中确定了三个主题:一些在可访问性方面的挑战、理解难易程度的差异,以及个人的有用性但对其他人的价值不确定。本文探讨了社区成员如何解释个人风险评估和预期寿命估计,以及这些评估如何因年龄、性别、种族/族裔、社会经济地位和预先存在的合并症而有所不同。

相似文献

1
Community focus groups about a COVID-19 individual risk assessment tool: access, understanding and usefulness.关于 COVID-19 个体风险评估工具的社区焦点小组:可及性、理解和有用性。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 11;23(1):1761. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16696-3.
2
Community focus groups about a COVID-19 individual risk assessment tool: access, understanding and usefulness.关于新冠病毒个体风险评估工具的社区焦点小组:获取、理解及实用性
Res Sq. 2022 Oct 5:rs.3.rs-2005098. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2005098/v1.
3
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
4
US-county level variation in intersecting individual, household and community characteristics relevant to COVID-19 and planning an equitable response: a cross-sectional analysis.美国县一级与 COVID-19 相关的个体、家庭和社区特征的交叉差异及其公平应对规划:一项横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 1;10(9):e039886. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039886.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Neighborhood Condition Prevalence Rates Correlate With COVID-19 Mortality in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin.威斯康星州密尔沃基县的社区状况患病率与新冠病毒疾病死亡率相关。
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2023 Jan 17;10(1):38-44. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1967. eCollection 2023 Winter.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
9
Disparities in COVID-19 Outcomes by Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status: A Systematic-Review and Meta-analysis.COVID-19结局在种族、族裔和社会经济地位方面的差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2134147. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34147.
10
Agency, access, and Anopheles: neighborhood health perceptions and the implications for community health interventions in Accra, Ghana.机构、获取途径与按蚊:加纳阿克拉的邻里健康认知及其对社区健康干预措施的影响
Glob Health Action. 2015 May 20;8:26492. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.26492. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating misinformation and political polarization of COVID-19: interviews with Milwaukee, Wisconsin county public health officials.应对 COVID-19 相关错误信息和政治两极化:对威斯康星州密尔沃基县公共卫生官员的采访。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 21;11:1215367. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1215367. eCollection 2023.
2
Fight COVID Milwaukee protective behaviors and risk communications associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.抗击密尔沃基 COVID 保护行为和与 COVID-19 大流行相关的风险传播。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 22;13(1):22949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49829-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term Protection Associated With COVID-19 Vaccination and Prior Infection.与新冠病毒疫苗接种及既往感染相关的长期保护作用。
JAMA. 2022 Oct 11;328(14):1402-1404. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.14660.
2
COVID-19 Risk Assessment Tool: Dual application of risk communication and risk governance.新型冠状病毒肺炎风险评估工具:风险沟通与风险治理的双重应用
Prog Disaster Sci. 2020 Oct;7:100109. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100109. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
3
An Investigation of Associations Between Race, Ethnicity, and Past Experiences of Discrimination with Medical Mistrust and COVID-19 Protective Strategies.种族、民族与歧视经历与医疗不信任和 COVID-19 保护策略之间关联的调查。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Aug;9(4):1430-1442. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01080-x. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
4
Living risk prediction algorithm (QCOVID) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study.成人因冠状病毒 19 住院和死亡风险的生存风险预测算法(QCOVID):全国推导和验证队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Oct 20;371:m3731. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3731.
5
Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY.使用 OpenSAFELY 分析与 COVID-19 相关死亡的因素。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):430-436. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
6
Black-White Risk Differentials in COVID-19 (SARS-COV2) Transmission, Mortality and Case Fatality in the United States: Translational Epidemiologic Perspective and Challenges.美国 COVID-19(SARS-COV2)传播、死亡率和病死率的黑-白风险差异:转化流行病学视角和挑战。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 17;17(12):4322. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124322.
7
Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency.健康保护行为、社交媒体使用与新冠疫情公共卫生紧急事件期间的阴谋论信仰。
Psychol Med. 2021 Jul;51(10):1763-1769. doi: 10.1017/S003329172000224X. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
8
Understanding Health Risk Comprehension: The Role of Math Anxiety, Subjective Numeracy, and Objective Numeracy.理解健康风险认知:数学焦虑、主观数感和客观数感的作用。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb;40(2):222-234. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20904725. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
9
Towards a More Inclusive and Dynamic Understanding of Medical Mistrust Informed by Science.从科学角度理解更具包容性和活力的医学不信任
Behav Med. 2019 Apr-Jun;45(2):79-85. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2019.1619511.
10
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.报告定性研究的标准:建议的综合。
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.