Centre for Crisis Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Sep 11;22(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01999-z.
Although several manuals and guidelines have been developed to enhance the quality of task-sharing interventions, it remains challenging to train non-professional personnel in mental health and psychosocial support. Practitioners must translate general recommendations into practical applications to make them relevant in demanding contexts. However, limited research exists on practical experiences with standardised programmes in the field.
To explore how experiences gained from the training of first-line health providers in a low-threshold intervention for children with trauma symptoms may guide implementation of such interventions in local communities in low-income countries.
We summarise 20 years of experience in the training of first-line health providers, teachers, and school counsellors in providing a low-threshold intervention. The intervention is called teaching recovery techniques (TRT), developed by the Children and War Foundation (CAW). Field notes containing notes from trainings and oral, informal feedback from participants are analysed using thematic analysis, a method well-suited for identifying, analysing, and reporting patterns, or themes, within data in qualitative research.
The analysis showed three main themes/ challenges: (1) Who can conduct the TRT intervention? (2) What form and content should the training take? (3) How can the intervention be used in a responsible way to follow the 'do no harm' principle? We discuss the implications of the findings for trainings in scalable interventions and further research.
尽管已经制定了几项手册和指南来提高任务分担干预措施的质量,但培训非专业的心理健康和社会心理支持人员仍然具有挑战性。从业者必须将一般建议转化为实际应用,使其在苛刻的环境中具有相关性。然而,在该领域,关于标准化方案实际经验的研究有限。
探讨从一线卫生保健提供者在创伤症状儿童的低门槛干预措施培训中获得的经验如何指导在低收入国家的当地社区中实施此类干预措施。
我们总结了 20 年来在一线卫生保健提供者、教师和学校辅导员中开展低门槛干预措施培训的经验。该干预措施称为教授康复技巧(TRT),由儿童与战争基金会(CAW)开发。使用主题分析对培训中的现场记录以及参与者的口头、非正式反馈进行分析,主题分析是一种非常适合识别、分析和报告定性研究中数据内模式或主题的方法。
分析显示了三个主要主题/挑战:(1)谁可以进行 TRT 干预?(2)培训应采取何种形式和内容?(3)如何以负责任的方式使用干预措施来遵循“不伤害”原则?我们讨论了这些发现对可扩展干预措施培训和进一步研究的影响。