Kim Jiho, Kim Hwan-Cheol, Kim Minsun, Yang Seong-Cheol, Park Shin-Goo, Leem Jong-Han, Lee Dong-Wook
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2023 Aug 17;35:e33. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2023.35.e33. eCollection 2023.
Studies on the association between occupational stress and depression have been frequently reported. However, the cross-sectional designs of studies limited insight into causal associations. In this study, we investigated the longitudinal association between occupational stress and new-onset depression among employees in a single manufacturing plant.
The annual health checkup data of employees at a manufacturing plant in Korea were collected. A total of 1,837 male employees without depression who completed a health checkup during two consecutive years were included. Occupational stress was measured using a short form of the Korea Occupational Stress Scale (KOSS-SF), and depression was assessed using a Patient Health Questionnaire-2. The association between occupational stress change over the two years and newly developed depression was investigated using two logistic regression models.
Across all sub-factors of KOSS-SF, employees who reported increased occupational stress had a higher risk of new-onset depression. Newly developed depression was significantly associated with job demand (odds ratio [OR]: 4.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.37-7.96), job insecurity (OR: 3.21; 95% CI: 1.89-5.48), occupational climate (OR: 3.18; 95% CI: 1.91-5.31), lack of reward (OR: 2.28; 95% CI: 1.26-4.12), interpersonal conflict (OR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.18-3.86), insufficient job control (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.05-3.56), and the organizational system (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.01-3.36).
For every sub-factor of the KOSS-SF, occupational stress increase and persistent high stress were associated with the risk of developing new-onset depression. Among the seven sub-factors, job demand had the most significant effect. Our results show that occupational stress should be managed to promote employee mental healthcare.
关于职业压力与抑郁症之间关联的研究屡见不鲜。然而,研究的横断面设计限制了对因果关联的深入理解。在本研究中,我们调查了一家制造工厂员工职业压力与新发抑郁症之间的纵向关联。
收集了韩国一家制造工厂员工的年度健康检查数据。纳入了连续两年完成健康检查的1837名无抑郁症的男性员工。使用韩国职业压力量表简表(KOSS-SF)测量职业压力,使用患者健康问卷-2评估抑郁症。使用两个逻辑回归模型研究两年间职业压力变化与新发生抑郁症之间的关联。
在KOSS-SF的所有子因素中,报告职业压力增加的员工新发抑郁症的风险更高。新发生的抑郁症与工作需求(优势比[OR]:4.34;95%置信区间[CI]:2.37-7.96)、工作不安全感(OR:3.21;95%CI:1.89-5.48)、职业氛围(OR:3.18;95%CI:1.91-5.31)、缺乏奖励(OR:2.28;95%CI:1.26-4.12)、人际冲突(OR:2.14;95%CI:1.18-3.86)、工作控制不足(OR:1.93;95%CI:1.05-3.56)和组织系统(OR:1.84;95%CI:1.01-3.36)显著相关。
对于KOSS-SF的每个子因素,职业压力增加和持续的高压力与新发抑郁症的风险相关。在七个子因素中,工作需求的影响最为显著。我们的结果表明,应管理职业压力以促进员工心理健康护理。