Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, NSW, Australia.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Jul;25(3):1871-1884. doi: 10.1177/15248380231196115. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
This review aimed to examine the relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration and trait narcissism, and whether the strength of this relationship differs depending on narcissism type (grandiose or vulnerable), the type of violence perpetrated, or the perpetrator's gender. Scopus, Medline, PsycInfo, and Academic Search Complete databases were searched on August 11, 2022. Studies were included if they were in English, measured IPV perpetration and trait narcissism, and examined the relationship between trait narcissism and IPV perpetration. Studies were excluded if they were review papers, conference extracts, book chapters, or if the data was not specific to trait narcissism. The AXIS tool was used to assess the quality and risk of bias of the studies. Twenty-two studies ( = 11,520 participants) were included in the random effects meta-analysis revealing a significant, weak, positive relationship between trait narcissism and IPV perpetration, = .15. Subgroup analyses revealed physical IPV perpetration was not significantly related to trait narcissism while cyber and psychological IPV perpetration were significantly, positively, weakly related to trait narcissism. No significant difference in the strength of the relationship with IPV perpetration was found between males and females. The relationship between trait narcissism and IPV perpetration was significantly greater for vulnerable narcissism than grandiose narcissism. Overall, the quality of the included studies was high, and risk of bias was low. All measures were self-report and underreporting could be present given both narcissistic traits and IPV perpetration are considered socially undesirable. Future research examining these relationships should specify IPV and narcissism types.
本综述旨在考察亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)施暴与特质自恋之间的关系,以及这种关系的强弱是否取决于自恋类型(浮夸型或脆弱型)、施暴类型或施暴者的性别。2022 年 8 月 11 日,检索了 Scopus、Medline、PsycInfo 和 Academic Search Complete 数据库。纳入的研究必须为英文,测量 IPV 施暴和特质自恋,并考察特质自恋与 IPV 施暴之间的关系。排除综述文章、会议摘录、书籍章节,以及数据不是特定于特质自恋的研究。使用 AXIS 工具评估研究的质量和偏倚风险。22 项研究(n=11520 名参与者)纳入随机效应荟萃分析,结果显示特质自恋与 IPV 施暴之间存在显著的、微弱的正相关,r=0.15。亚组分析显示,身体暴力 IPV 施暴与特质自恋无显著相关性,而网络和心理暴力 IPV 施暴与特质自恋呈显著、正相关、微弱相关。男性和女性之间 IPV 施暴与特质自恋的关系强度无显著差异。特质自恋与 IPV 施暴的关系在脆弱型自恋中显著大于浮夸型自恋。总体而言,纳入研究的质量较高,偏倚风险较低。所有测量均为自我报告,由于自恋特质和 IPV 施暴都被认为是社会不可取的,因此可能存在漏报。未来研究应具体说明 IPV 和自恋类型,以检验这些关系。