• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全血不裂解不洗涤微检测法定量测定单核细胞 HLA-DR。

Whole blood no-lyse no-wash micromethod for the quantitative measurement of monocyte HLA-DR.

机构信息

Institute of Integrative Biology of the Cell, CNRS, CEA, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Paediatric Intensive Care and Neonatal Medicine, AP-HP, Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.

出版信息

Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2024 Jan;106(1):58-63. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.22142. Epub 2023 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1002/cyto.b.22142
PMID:37702371
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Monocyte (m)HLA-DR expression appears to be a potent marker of immunosuppression in critically ill patients. The persistence of low mHLA-DR expression is associated with an increased risk of nosocomial infections and mortality. To adapt this measurement to pediatric requirements and provide extensive 24/7 access, we have developed a whole blood no-lyse no-wash micromethod (MM) and compared it with the standardized method (SM).

METHODS

mHLA-DR was quantified by flow cytometry using Quantibrite™ Anti-HLA-DR PE/Monocyte PerCP-Cy™5.5 with either the SM performed in a diagnostic hematology laboratory using manufacturer protocol, or a whole blood no-lyse no-wash MM using an Attune flow cytometer located in the pediatric ICU. Median fluorescence intensity was measured in both techniques and converted to antibodies per cell (AB/C) calibrated with BD Quantibrite™ PE beads. Blood and Quantibrite™ reagent volume used with the MM was reduced by 5-fold compared to SM. In addition to Quantibrite™ Anti-Human HLA-DR PE/Monocyte PerCP-Cy™5.5, MM required anti-CD45 and anti-CD19 labeling.

RESULTS

We determined the expression of mHLA-DR in 34 patients, 20 adults, and 14 children admitted to ICU. Correlation between MM and SM was excellent (Pearson's correlation: y = 0.8192x + 678.7, r = 0.9270, p < 0.0001). The estimated bias was 2467 ± 1.96 × 3307 AB/C; CI 95% [-4016; +8949].

CONCLUSIONS

The no-lyse no-wash whole blood microvolume method for measuring mHLA-DR expression allows for simplified sample preparation without compromising accuracy of the data. This method may simplify immune monitoring of critically ill patient by the deployment of a point of care method.

摘要

背景

单核细胞 (m)HLA-DR 表达似乎是危重病患者免疫抑制的有力标志物。低 mHLA-DR 表达的持续存在与医院获得性感染和死亡率增加有关。为了适应儿科的需求并提供广泛的 24/7 访问,我们开发了一种全血不裂解、不洗涤微方法 (MM),并将其与标准化方法 (SM) 进行了比较。

方法

使用流式细胞术通过 Quantibrite™ Anti-HLA-DR PE/Monocyte PerCP-Cy™5.5 定量 mHLA-DR,SM 采用制造商方案在诊断血液学实验室中进行,或者使用位于儿科 ICU 的 Attune 流式细胞仪进行全血不裂解、不洗涤 MM。在两种技术中测量中荧光强度,并转换为与 BD Quantibrite™ PE 珠校准的每细胞抗体 (AB/C)。与 SM 相比,MM 减少了 5 倍的血液和 Quantibrite™ 试剂用量。除了 Quantibrite™ Anti-Human HLA-DR PE/Monocyte PerCP-Cy™5.5 之外,MM 还需要抗 CD45 和抗 CD19 标记。

结果

我们确定了 34 名入住 ICU 的患者(20 名成人和 14 名儿童)的 mHLA-DR 表达。MM 与 SM 之间的相关性非常好(Pearson 相关性:y=0.8192x+678.7,r=0.9270,p<0.0001)。估计偏差为 2467±1.96×3307 AB/C;95%CI [−4016;+8949]。

结论

用于测量 mHLA-DR 表达的无裂解、无洗涤全血微体积方法允许简化样品制备,而不会影响数据的准确性。这种方法通过部署即时护理方法,可能会简化对危重病患者的免疫监测。

相似文献

1
Whole blood no-lyse no-wash micromethod for the quantitative measurement of monocyte HLA-DR.全血不裂解不洗涤微检测法定量测定单核细胞 HLA-DR。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2024 Jan;106(1):58-63. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.22142. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
2
Monitoring temporary immunodepression by flow cytometric measurement of monocytic HLA-DR expression: a multicenter standardized study.通过流式细胞术检测单核细胞 HLA-DR 表达监测暂时性免疫抑制:一项多中心标准化研究
Clin Chem. 2005 Dec;51(12):2341-7. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.052639. Epub 2005 Oct 7.
3
Quantitation of mHLA-DR and nCD64 by Flow Cytometry to Study Dysregulated Host Response: The Use of QuantiBRITE™ PE Beads and Its Stability.通过流式细胞术对mHLA-DR和nCD64进行定量以研究宿主反应失调:QuantiBRITE™ PE微球的应用及其稳定性。
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2023 Sep;195(9):5747-5752. doi: 10.1007/s12010-022-03819-6. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
4
Reduced Monocytic Human Leukocyte Antigen-DR Expression Indicates Immunosuppression in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients.危重症 COVID-19 患者单核细胞 HLA-DR 表达降低提示免疫抑制。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Oct;131(4):993-999. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005044.
5
A flow cytometric assay for HLA-DR expression on monocytes validated as a biomarker for enrollment in sepsis clinical trials.一种用于单核细胞 HLA-DR 表达的流式细胞术检测方法,已被验证为脓毒症临床试验入组的生物标志物。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2021 Jan;100(1):103-114. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21987. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
Monocyte HLA-DR Assessment by a Novel Point-of-Care Device Is Feasible for Early Identification of ICU Patients With Complicated Courses-A Study.新型床旁检测设备评估单核细胞 HLA-DR 对识别 ICU 复杂病程患者具有可行性:一项研究
Front Immunol. 2019 Mar 12;10:432. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00432. eCollection 2019.
7
Inter-laboratory assessment of flow cytometric monocyte HLA-DR expression in clinical samples.临床样本中单核细胞 HLA-DR 表达的流式细胞术实验室间评估
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2013 Jan-Feb;84(1):59-62. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21043. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
8
Association of monocyte HLA-DR expression over time with secondary infection in critically ill children: a prospective observational study.随时间推移单核细胞 HLA-DR 表达与危重症患儿继发感染的相关性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Mar;181(3):1133-1142. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04313-7. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
9
Prolonged suppression of monocytic human leukocyte antigen-DR expression correlates with mortality in pediatric septic patients in a pediatric tertiary Intensive Care Unit.在一家儿科三级重症监护病房中,单核细胞人类白细胞抗原-DR表达的长期抑制与儿科脓毒症患者的死亡率相关。
J Crit Care. 2016 Jun;33:84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.01.027. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
10
Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Measurement of HLA-DRA Gene Expression in Whole Blood Is Highly Reproducible and Shows Changes That Reflect Dynamic Shifts in Monocyte Surface HLA-DR Expression during the Course of Sepsis.全血中HLA-DRA基因表达的定量实时聚合酶链反应测量具有高度可重复性,并显示出反映脓毒症病程中单核细胞表面HLA-DR表达动态变化的改变。
PLoS One. 2016 May 4;11(5):e0154690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154690. eCollection 2016.