• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区药房戒烟干预:12 个月随访的非随机群组对照试验的成本效益。

Smoking cessation intervention in the community pharmacy: Cost-effectiveness of a non-randomized cluster-controlled trial at 12-months' follow-up.

机构信息

Respiratory and Smoking Group of the Spanish Society of Clinical, Family and Community Pharmacy, Paseo de las Delicias 31, Madrid, Spain; Spanish Society of Clinical, Family and Community Pharmacy, Paseo de las Delicias 31, Madrid, Spain.

Respiratory and Smoking Group of the Spanish Society of Clinical, Family and Community Pharmacy, Paseo de las Delicias 31, Madrid, Spain; Spanish Society of Clinical, Family and Community Pharmacy, Paseo de las Delicias 31, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Jan;20(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.09.003
PMID:37704533
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of an intervention based on a training course for community pharmacists and a smoking cessation service (CESAR©), using limited societal and the health provider perspectives.

METHODS

Non-randomized controlled trial of 12-months' follow-up. Spanish community pharmacists who were previously trained with CESAR© formed the intervention group (n = 102), and control group delivered usual care (n = 80). CESAR Patients were smokers identified by the community pharmacists when they attended the pharmacy. Data were self-reported. Outcomes were smoking cessation and quality-of-life (EQ-5D-3L) and were collected at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Costs data included direct health costs, work loss, and intervention costs. Smoking cessation was analyzed through logistic regression models. Generalized linear models were carried out for quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and costs. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and cost-utility ratio (ICUR) were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 800 smoking patients were included in the intervention group and 278 in the control group. Of these, 487 and 151 patients completed the study, respectively. Costs were lower in the intervention group compared to the control group in both perspectives. At 12 months, 54.3% and 37.1% patients from the intervention and the control groups reported smoking cessation, respectively. The difference in probability of cessation in the intervention compared to the control group was 17.6% (CI:0.05; 0.25). The mean QALY was higher in the intervention group [0.03(CI: 0.01; 0.07)]. The ICER and the ICUR were dominant for the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

This intervention for smoking cessation showed that the CESAR© intervention, that combined a training for community pharmacists with a smoking cessation service was efficient for smoking cessation and QALY at 12 months' follow-up.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05461066, retrospectively registered (July 15, 2022).

摘要

背景

本研究从有限的社会和医疗服务提供者角度评估了一项基于社区药剂师培训课程和戒烟服务(CESAR©)的干预措施的成本效益。

方法

这是一项为期 12 个月随访的非随机对照试验。接受过 CESAR©培训的西班牙社区药剂师组成干预组(n=102),对照组提供常规护理(n=80)。CESAR 患者是社区药剂师在药房就诊时发现的吸烟者。数据采用自我报告的方式收集。结果为戒烟和生活质量(EQ-5D-3L),分别在基线、6 个月和 12 个月时进行评估。成本数据包括直接医疗成本、工作损失和干预成本。通过逻辑回归模型分析戒烟情况。采用广义线性模型进行质量调整生命年(QALY)和成本分析。计算增量成本效益比(ICER)和成本效用比(ICUR)。

结果

共有 800 名吸烟患者纳入干预组,278 名患者纳入对照组。其中,分别有 487 名和 151 名患者完成了研究。从两个角度来看,干预组的成本均低于对照组。在 12 个月时,干预组和对照组分别有 54.3%和 37.1%的患者报告戒烟。干预组与对照组相比,戒烟的概率差异为 17.6%(CI:0.05;0.25)。干预组的平均 QALY 更高[0.03(CI:0.01;0.07)]。干预组的 ICER 和 ICUR 占主导地位。

结论

本项针对戒烟的干预措施表明,CESAR©干预措施将社区药剂师培训与戒烟服务相结合,在 12 个月的随访中对戒烟和 QALY 具有较高的效果。

试验注册

NCT05461066,回顾性注册(2022 年 7 月 15 日)。

相似文献

1
Smoking cessation intervention in the community pharmacy: Cost-effectiveness of a non-randomized cluster-controlled trial at 12-months' follow-up.社区药房戒烟干预:12 个月随访的非随机群组对照试验的成本效益。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Jan;20(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
2
A cost utility analysis alongside a cluster-randomised trial evaluating a minor ailment service compared to usual care in community pharmacy.一项成本效用分析与一项评估社区药房小病服务与常规护理的集群随机试验同时进行。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):1253. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07188-4.
3
Community pharmacy personnel interventions for smoking cessation.社区药房工作人员针对戒烟的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003698. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003698.pub2.
4
Cost-effectiveness of e-cigarettes compared with nicotine replacement therapy in stop smoking services in England (TEC study): a randomized controlled trial.英格兰戒烟服务中电子烟与尼古丁替代疗法相比的成本效益(TEC 研究):一项随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2020 Mar;115(3):507-517. doi: 10.1111/add.14829. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of smoking-cessation counseling training for physicians and pharmacists.针对医生和药剂师的戒烟咨询培训的成本效益分析。
Addict Behav. 2015 Jun;45:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
6
Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Cost-Utility of a Digital Smoking Cessation Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Health Economic Evaluation and Outcomes of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.癌症幸存者数字化戒烟干预的效果、成本效益和成本效用:一项实用随机对照试验的健康经济学评价和结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 17;24(3):e27588. doi: 10.2196/27588.
7
Cost-utility analysis of provision of e-cigarette starter kits for smoking cessation in emergency departments: An economic evaluation of a randomized controlled trial.急诊科提供电子烟戒烟套装的成本效用分析:一项随机对照试验的经济评估。
Addiction. 2025 Feb;120(2):368-379. doi: 10.1111/add.16698. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
8
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a work-place smoking cessation intervention with and without financial incentives.工作场所戒烟干预措施的成本效益和成本效用分析,有无财务激励措施。
Addiction. 2020 Mar;115(3):534-545. doi: 10.1111/add.14861. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
9
Cost-effectiveness of a community pharmacist intervention in patients with depression: a randomized controlled trial (PRODEFAR Study).社区药剂师干预抑郁症患者的成本效益:一项随机对照试验(PRODEFAR 研究)。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 12;8(8):e70588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070588. eCollection 2013.
10
Community Pharmacists Assisting in Total Cardiovascular Health (CPATCH): A Cluster-Randomized, Controlled Trial Testing a Focused Adherence Strategy Involving Community Pharmacies.社区药剂师助力全面心血管健康(CPATCH):一项群组随机对照试验,测试一项涉及社区药房的针对性依从性策略
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Oct;36(10):1055-1064. doi: 10.1002/phar.1831. Epub 2016 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Community pharmacists' perception of knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward oral health promotion: A Cross-sectional study on the influence of training, demographics, and resources in the UAE.社区药剂师对口腔健康促进的知识、态度和实践的认知:关于阿联酋培训、人口统计学和资源影响的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0323193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323193. eCollection 2025.
2
Pharmacy Customers' Attitudes Towards Expanded Pharmacy Services in Croatia.克罗地亚药房顾客对扩展药房服务的态度。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Dec 31;13(1):2. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy13010002.
3
Redesigning Pharmacy to Improve Public Health Outcomes: Expanding Retail Spaces for Digital Therapeutics to Replace Consumer Products That Increase Mortality and Morbidity Risks.
重新设计药房以改善公共卫生成果:扩大数字疗法的零售空间,取代那些增加死亡和发病风险的消费品。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Jul 12;12(4):107. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12040107.
4
Development of self-care in Spanish community pharmacies.西班牙社区药房自我护理的发展。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Sep 26;12:100337. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100337. eCollection 2023 Dec.