Tobacco Control Research Group, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Nov 22;25(12):1847-1855. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad178.
We found no comprehensive studies on the location of transnational tobacco and leaf company (TTLC) subsidiaries (business entities they control) or the consequences of their presence on health policy.
Here we assess (1) the global reach of TTLCs by mapping their tobacco growing and manufacturing subsidiaries and (2) the relationship between in-country presence of the tobacco industry and their power and interference. Data on subsidiaries were collated through systematic searching for countries' supply chain activities in documents and web pages. Cross-sectional multiple regression analysis was used to assess the association between the number of agricultural and manufacturing TTLCs and the Tobacco Industry Interference score, and the degree to which these were mediated by tobacco control, good governance, and economic importance of tobacco.
TTLC supply chain activity had global reach. As the number of TTLCs with tobacco growing and manufacturing activities rose, interference increased significantly. Interference was associated with poorer tobacco control. The association with more TTLCs undertaking final product manufacturing was related to higher-value tobacco exports but was not related to tobacco making a bigger contribution to the economy.
TTLCs continue to control the global tobacco supply chain through their globe-spanning subsidiaries. The presence of TTLCs in a country is associated with political interference. Countries should consider their participation in the tobacco supply chain alongside the understanding that they are likely to cede political power to TTLCs, potentially undermining the health of their populations.
Tobacco control research has traditionally concentrated on the demand side of tobacco. Our results lend support to calls for more research on the supply of tobacco. Governments should require tobacco companies to provide detailed, up-to-date information in an easily accessible format on in-country supply chain activities. Policymakers should take the likelihood of political interference in health and environmental policy into account when making decisions about foreign direct investment offered by the tobacco industry.
我们没有发现关于跨国烟草和叶片公司(它们控制的商业实体)子公司的位置或它们对卫生政策的存在的后果的综合研究。
在这里,我们评估(1)通过绘制其烟草种植和制造子公司的地图来评估 TTLC 的全球影响力,以及(2)国内烟草业的存在与其权力和干预之间的关系。通过系统搜索文件和网页中的供应链活动,收集了有关子公司的数据。使用横截面多回归分析评估了农业和制造 TTLC 的数量与烟草业干扰得分之间的关系,以及烟草控制、良好治理和烟草经济重要性在多大程度上调解了这种关系。
TTLC 供应链活动具有全球影响力。随着从事烟草种植和制造活动的 TTLC 数量的增加,干扰显著增加。干扰与较差的烟草控制有关。与更多的 TTLC 从事最终产品制造相关的关联与更高价值的烟草出口有关,但与烟草对经济的贡献更大无关。
TTLC 通过其遍布全球的子公司继续控制全球烟草供应链。一个国家 TTLC 的存在与政治干预有关。各国在考虑参与烟草供应链的同时,应该认识到它们可能会将政治权力让给 TTLC,从而有可能损害其人民的健康。
烟草控制研究传统上集中于烟草的需求方面。我们的结果支持了更多关于烟草供应的研究的呼吁。政府应要求烟草公司以易于访问的格式提供有关国内供应链活动的详细、最新信息。决策者在就烟草业提供的外国直接投资做出决策时,应考虑到健康和环境政策可能受到政治干预的可能性。