Suppr超能文献

利用标准化体验调查中的患者意见来调查他们的看法并确定改进措施的优先级:主题和句法分析。

Using patient comments from a standardised experience survey to investigate their perceptions and prioritise improvement actions: a thematic and syntactic analysis.

机构信息

Research On Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

Institut d'études KPAM, Paris, France.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 14;23(1):988. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09953-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although patient experience surveys flourish in many countries with the aim to improve quality of care, questions remain concerning their ability to become effective drivers of change within institutions. The patient comments from the French national patient experience hospital survey were analysed using an innovative structured approach to characterise patient experience and identify field actions for the institutions.

METHODS

The comments were taken from the two open-ended questions comprised in the patient experience survey of the Hospices Civils de Lyon between 2018 and 2019. The comments analysis methodology consisted in three steps: thematic analysis; syntactic analysis; generation of statistics for the creation of a patient journey and prioritisation of sub-themes. The STROBE statement checklist was followed.

RESULTS

Over a year, 79.7% of the 7 362 respondents left at least one comment at the end of the survey and were included in the study, for a total of 5 868 surveys and 10 061 comments. These led to the identification of 28 general themes and 184 specific sub-themes. From the patient journey created, 23 sub-themes were prioritised and gathered into four key categories: relationship between patient and staff; environment; surgery and pain management; information and care coordination. For each of them, the actions and expectations formulated by the respondents were described.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of patient comments obtained from a standardised survey allowed to characterise the patient journey using data that describes patient experience, enabling a prioritisation of actions aiming to improve practice and quality of care at the institution, department, and staff level.

摘要

背景

尽管患者体验调查在许多国家蓬勃发展,旨在改善医疗质量,但仍存在疑问,即它们是否有能力成为机构内部变革的有效驱动因素。使用一种创新的结构化方法对法国国家患者体验医院调查的患者意见进行了分析,以描述患者体验并确定机构的行动领域。

方法

这些意见来自于 2018 年至 2019 年期间里昂民事收容所患者体验调查中的两个开放式问题。意见分析方法包括三个步骤:主题分析;句法分析;为创建患者旅程和优先考虑子主题生成统计数据。遵循 STROBE 声明清单。

结果

在一年的时间里,79.7%的 7362 名受访者在调查结束时至少留下了一条意见,共收到 5868 份调查和 10061 条意见。这导致确定了 28 个一般主题和 184 个具体子主题。从创建的患者旅程中,优先考虑了 23 个子主题,并将其分为四个关键类别:患者与员工之间的关系;环境;手术和疼痛管理;信息和护理协调。对于每一个类别,都描述了受访者提出的行动和期望。

结论

对标准化调查中获得的患者意见的分析,使用描述患者体验的数据来描述患者旅程,从而能够优先考虑旨在改善机构、部门和员工层面实践和护理质量的行动。

相似文献

2
[E-Satis : A new method for analysis of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)].
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2023 Jun;71(3):101839. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2023.101839. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
4
Computer-assisted textual analysis of free-text comments in the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences (SCAPE) survey.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):1029. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05873-4.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
9
Web-based textual analysis of free-text patient experience comments from a survey in primary care.
JMIR Med Inform. 2015 May 6;3(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3783.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
[E-Satis : A new method for analysis of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)].
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2023 Jun;71(3):101839. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2023.101839. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
2
Adjustment of Patient Experience Surveys for How People Respond.
Med Care. 2021 Mar 1;59(3):202-205. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001489.
3
5
Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):697-705. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030.
6
From the closest observers of patient care: a thematic analysis of online narrative reviews of hospitals.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Nov;25(11):889-897. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004515. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
7
Development and testing of a text-mining approach to analyse patients' comments on their experiences of colorectal cancer care.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):604-14. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004063. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
8
Taking Patients' Narratives about Clinicians from Anecdote to Science.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 13;373(7):675-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1502361.
9
Text mining applications in psychiatry: a systematic literature review.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2016 Jun;25(2):86-100. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1481. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
10
Should health care providers be accountable for patients' care experiences?
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Feb;30(2):253-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3111-7. Epub 2014 Nov 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验