Pender Melissa, Throneberry S Kyle, Grisel Nancy, Leung Daniel T, Lopansri Bert K
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Epidemiology, Intermountain Health, Murray, Utah, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 10;10(5):ofad184. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad184. eCollection 2023 May.
Including (CD) in gastrointestinal multiplex molecular panels (GIPCR) presents a diagnostic challenge. Incidental detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) without consideration of pretest probability (PTP) may inadvertently delay diagnoses of other treatable causes of diarrhea and lead to prescription of unnecessary antibiotics.
We conducted a retrospective study to determine the frequency at which clinicians characterize PTP and disease severity in adult patients who test positive for CD by GIPCR. We organized subjects into cohorts based on the status of their CD PCR, glutamate dehydrogenase enzyme immunoassay (GDH), and toxin A/B detection, as well as by high, moderate, or low CD PTP. We used multivariable regression models to describe predictors of toxin positivity.
We identified 483 patients with positive CD PCR targets. Only 22% were positive for both GDH and CD toxin. Among patients with a low PTP for CDI, 11% demonstrated a positive CD toxin result compared to 63% of patients with a high PTP. A low clinician PTP for CD infection (CDI) correlated with a negative CD toxin result compared to cases of moderate-to-high PTP for CDI (odds ratio, 0.19 [95% confidence interval, .10-.36]). Up to 64% of patients with negative GDH and CD toxin received CD treatment. Only receipt of prior antibiotics, fever, and a moderate-to-high clinician PTP were statistically significant predictors of toxin positivity.
Patients with a positive CD PCR were likely to receive treatment regardless of PTP or CD toxin results. We recommend that CD positivity on GIPCR be interpreted with caution, particularly in the setting of a low PTP.
在胃肠道多重分子检测板(GIPCR)中纳入艰难梭菌(CD)检测带来了诊断挑战。通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)偶然检测到CD,而不考虑检测前概率(PTP),可能会无意中延迟对其他可治疗腹泻病因的诊断,并导致开具不必要的抗生素处方。
我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以确定临床医生对通过GIPCR检测CD呈阳性的成年患者的PTP和疾病严重程度进行评估的频率。我们根据患者的CD PCR、谷氨酸脱氢酶免疫测定(GDH)和毒素A/B检测结果,以及高、中或低CD PTP状态将受试者分组。我们使用多变量回归模型来描述毒素阳性的预测因素。
我们确定了483例CD PCR靶点呈阳性的患者。只有22%的患者GDH和CD毒素均呈阳性。在CD感染(CDI)PTP较低的患者中,11%的患者CD毒素检测结果为阳性,而PTP较高的患者中这一比例为63%。与CDI中、高PTP的病例相比,临床医生对CDI的PTP较低与CD毒素检测结果为阴性相关(比值比,0.19[95%置信区间,0.10 - 0.36])。高达64%的GDH和CD毒素检测结果为阴性的患者接受了CD治疗。只有先前接受过抗生素治疗、发热以及临床医生的中、高PTP是毒素阳性的统计学显著预测因素。
无论PTP或CD毒素检测结果如何,CD PCR呈阳性的患者都可能接受治疗。我们建议谨慎解读GIPCR上的CD阳性结果,尤其是在PTP较低的情况下。