Kim Won-Joong, Park Hahck Soo, Park Min Ki
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Pain. 2019 Oct 1;32(4):280-285. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.4.280.
Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a treatment modality that alleviates radicular pain by intermittently applying high-frequency currents adjacent to the dorsal root ganglion. There has been no comparative study on analgesic effect according to the position of the needle tip in PRF treatment. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of PRF according to the needle tip position.
Patients were classified into 2 groups (group IP [group inside of pedicle] and group OP [group outside of pedicle]) based on needle tip position in the anteroposterior view of fluoroscopy. In the anteroposterior view, the needle tip was advanced medially further than the lateral aspect of the corresponding pedicle in group IP; however, in group OP, the needle tip was not advanced. The treatment outcomes and pain scores were evaluated at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after applying PRF.
At 4, 8, and 12 weeks, there were no significant differences between the successful response rate and numerical rating scale score ratio.
The analgesic efficacy of PRF treatment did not differ with the needle tip position.
脉冲射频(PRF)是一种通过在背根神经节附近间歇性施加高频电流来缓解神经根性疼痛的治疗方式。关于PRF治疗中针尖位置对镇痛效果的比较研究尚无报道。本研究的目的是根据针尖位置评估PRF的临床疗效。
根据荧光透视前后位视图中的针尖位置,将患者分为两组(椎弓根内组[IP组]和椎弓根外组[OP组])。在前后位视图中,IP组的针尖向内侧推进的距离超过相应椎弓根的外侧缘;然而,在OP组中,针尖未推进。在应用PRF后4周、8周和12周评估治疗效果和疼痛评分。
在4周、8周和12周时,成功反应率和数字评分量表评分率之间无显著差异。
PRF治疗的镇痛效果与针尖位置无关。