• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2016年至2022年美国全膝关节置换翻修术的当前流行病学情况。

The Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States From 2016 to 2022.

作者信息

Dubin Jeremy A, Bains Sandeep S, Paulson Ambika E, Monarrez Ruben, Hameed Daniel, Nace James, Mont Michael, Delanois Ronald E

机构信息

Lifebridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland.

School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2024 Mar;39(3):760-765. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.09.013. Epub 2023 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2023.09.013
PMID:37717833
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The number of revision total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) is projected to reach 268,200 cases annually by 2030 in the United States. The growing demand for revision TKA can be attributed to the successes of primary TKAs combined with an aging population, patient desires to remain active, as well as expanded indications for younger patients. Given the evolving nature of revision TKAs, an epidemiological analysis of: (1) etiologies; (2) demographics, including age and region; as well as (3) lengths of stay (LOS) offers a way to minimize the gap between appropriate understanding and effective intervention.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2022, a national, all-payer database was queried. Incidences and indications were analyzed for a total of 135,983 patients who had revision TKA procedures.

RESULTS

The most common etiologies for revision TKA procedures were infection (19.3%) and aseptic loosening (12.8%), followed by mechanical complications (7.9%). The largest age group was 65 to 74 years (34.9%) followed by 55 to 64 years (32.2%), then age >75 years (20.5%). The South had the largest total procedure cohort (39.8%), followed by the Midwest (28.6%), then the Northeast (18.6%), and the West (13.0%). The mean length of stay was 3.86 days (range, 1.0 to 15.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study details the current status of revision TKA through 2022. While infection and aseptic loosening remain leading causes, we found a low aseptic loosening rate of 12.8%.

摘要

背景

预计到2030年,美国每年翻修全膝关节置换术(TKA)的病例数将达到268,200例。翻修TKA需求的不断增长可归因于初次TKA的成功、人口老龄化、患者保持活跃的愿望以及年轻患者适应证的扩大。鉴于翻修TKA的不断发展,对以下方面进行流行病学分析:(1)病因;(2)人口统计学特征,包括年龄和地区;以及(3)住院时间(LOS),提供了一种缩小适当理解与有效干预之间差距的方法。

方法

查询了2016年至2022年的全国全付费者数据库。对总共135,983例行翻修TKA手术的患者的发病率和适应证进行了分析。

结果

翻修TKA手术最常见的病因是感染(19.3%)和无菌性松动(12.8%),其次是机械并发症(7.9%)。最大的年龄组是65至74岁(34.9%),其次是55至64岁(32.2%),然后是年龄>75岁(20.5%)。南部的手术队列总数最多(39.8%),其次是中西部(28.6%),然后是东北部(18.6%)和西部(13.0%)。平均住院时间为3.86天(范围为1.0至15.0天)。

结论

我们的研究详细阐述了截至2022年翻修TKA的现状。虽然感染和无菌性松动仍然是主要原因,但我们发现无菌性松动率较低,为12.8%。

相似文献

1
The Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States From 2016 to 2022.2016年至2022年美国全膝关节置换翻修术的当前流行病学情况。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Mar;39(3):760-765. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.09.013. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
2
Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States.美国翻修全膝关节置换术的当前流行病学。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2663-2668. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.066. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
3
Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA.翻修关节成形术的比较流行病学:失败的全髋关节置换术比失败的全膝关节置换术带来更大的临床和经济负担。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2131-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4078-8. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
4
Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees.人工关节周围感染是现代膝关节置换术失败的主要原因:对11134例膝关节的分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2194-2201. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5396-4. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
5
Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.在使用骨水泥固定柄的 416 例翻修全膝关节置换术中,采用内翻-外翻限制技术可提供可靠的重建,在早期至中期随访中具有较低的后续翻修率。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Apr;102-B(4):458-462. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2019-0719.R2.
6
Complications and failures of non-tumoral hinged total knee arthroplasty in primary and aseptic revision surgery: A review of 290 cases.非肿瘤铰链式全膝关节置换术在初次和无菌翻修手术中的并发症和失败:290 例回顾。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 May;107(3):102875. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102875. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
7
Revision total knee arthroplasty for flexion instability : a concise follow-up of a previous report.翻修膝关节置换术治疗屈曲不稳定:对先前报告的简短随访。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Oct;104-B(10):1126-1131. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B10.BJJ-2022-0358.R1.
8
Trend Shift in the Cause of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty over 17 Years.翻修全膝关节置换术病因的趋势变化:17 年回顾研究
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Apr;15(2):219-226. doi: 10.4055/cios21106. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
9
Contemporary Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 50 Years: 1 in 3 Risk of Re-Revision by 10 Years.50 岁以下患者的当代全膝关节翻修术:10 年内再次翻修的风险为 1/3。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S266-S270. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
10
Have the frequency of and reasons for revision total knee arthroplasty changed since 2000? Comparison of two cohorts from the same hospital: 255 cases (2013-2016) and 68 cases (1991-1998).自 2000 年以来,全膝关节置换术的修订频率和原因是否发生了变化?对同一医院的两个队列进行比较:255 例(2013-2016 年)和 68 例(1991-1998 年)。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Jun;105(4):639-645. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.025. Epub 2019 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
[Revision analysis and successful solutions for my failed primary total knee arthroplasties].[我失败的初次全膝关节置换术的翻修分析及成功解决方案]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s00132-025-04714-8.
2
Sex differences of proximal tibia anthropometry in a Chinese population: comparison with sizing of tibial implants.中国人群胫骨近端人体测量学的性别差异:与胫骨植入物尺寸的比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 9;20(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06020-7.
3
Economic evaluation of robotic-assisted versus manual unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of Markov models and clinical studies.
机器人辅助与手动单髁膝关节置换术的经济学评估:马尔可夫模型与临床研究的系统评价
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 8;20(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06017-2.
4
Effect of Converting Kinematic Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty to Mechanical Axis Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty on Gap Measurements.将运动学对线全膝关节置换转换为机械轴翻修全膝关节置换对间隙测量的影响。
Cureus. 2025 Apr 12;17(4):e82148. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82148. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Does Timing of Hindfoot Reconstruction Before or After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Impact Reoperation Rates?后足重建在初次全膝关节置换术前或术后进行的时机是否会影响再次手术率?
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025 Mar 17;10(1):24730114251318735. doi: 10.1177/24730114251318735. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
AI classification of knee prostheses from plain radiographs and real-world applications.基于X线平片的膝关节假体人工智能分类及实际应用
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Mar 11;35(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04238-z.
7
A Murine Model of Non-Wear-Particle-Induced Aseptic Loosening.非磨损颗粒诱导的无菌性松动的小鼠模型。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Nov 4;9(11):673. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9110673.
8
New materials and complications of prostheses in humans: situation in Spain.人工器官的新材料和并发症:西班牙的情况。
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2024 Oct;37(5):369-386. doi: 10.37201/req/039.2024. Epub 2024 May 23.