Kyusa Muhindo Macky, Kruger Herculina Salome, de Lange-Loots Zelda
Centre of Excellence for Nutrition, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Medical Research Council Unit for Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
J Public Health Res. 2023 Sep 14;12(3):22799036231196732. doi: 10.1177/22799036231196732. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Adult overweight and obesity, in addition to the intake of saturated fat and total serum cholesterol must be monitored as biological risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) provides data on body fat for use in epidemiological settings. However, optimized equations should be used to calculate percentage body fat (%BF). The purpose of this study was to assess the differences between %BF calculated using different published BIA equations and %BF measured by BIA in young South African adults.
In this observational study, differences in calculated %BF were assessed, with different BIA equations retrieved from the literature used in 1128 healthy young adults aged 20-30 years. The %BF (measured by BIA) was compared between equations, between Black and White men and women, respectively.
The results showed statistically significant differences in the %BF calculated from published BIA equations when used in young South African adults (χ² = 946, χ² = 2528, χ² = 2088, respectively, p < 0.0001). In Black and White men and women, respectively, %BF levels were significantly higher when calculated by equations, than when measured by BIA (p < 0.0001).
There seem to be large discrepancies in estimating %BF by BIA equations and these values cannot be used interchangeably for young South African adults. A South African age, ethnicity and sex-specific BIA equation needs to be developed to accurately estimate %BF in young South African adults.
成人超重和肥胖,以及饱和脂肪摄入量和血清总胆固醇,必须作为非传染性疾病(NCDs)的生物风险因素进行监测。生物电阻抗分析(BIA)可提供用于流行病学研究的身体脂肪数据。然而,应使用优化方程来计算体脂百分比(%BF)。本研究的目的是评估使用不同已发表的BIA方程计算的%BF与南非年轻成年人通过BIA测量的%BF之间的差异。
在这项观察性研究中,评估了计算得出的%BF的差异,从文献中检索了不同的BIA方程,应用于1128名年龄在20 - 30岁的健康年轻成年人。分别比较了不同方程之间、黑人和白人男性与女性之间通过BIA测量的%BF。
结果显示,当将已发表的BIA方程用于南非年轻成年人时,计算得出的%BF存在统计学显著差异(χ²分别为946、χ²为2528、χ²为2088,p < 0.0001)。在黑人和白人男性与女性中,通过方程计算得出的%BF水平分别显著高于通过BIA测量得出的水平(p < 0.0001)。
通过BIA方程估算%BF似乎存在很大差异,这些值不能在南非年轻成年人中互换使用。需要开发一个针对南非年龄、种族和性别的BIA方程,以准确估算南非年轻成年人的%BF。