Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg 1700, Switzerland.
Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg 1700, Switzerland
Learn Mem. 2023 Sep 19;30(9):192-200. doi: 10.1101/lm.053683.122. Print 2023 Sep.
Sleep supports memory consolidation, and slow-wave sleep (SWS) in particular is assumed to benefit the consolidation of verbal learning material. Re-exposure to previously learned words during SWS with a technique known as targeted memory reactivation (TMR) consistently benefits memory. However, TMR has also been successfully applied during sleep stage N2, though a direct comparison between words selectively reactivated during SWS versus N2 is still missing. Here, we directly compared the effects of N2 TMR and SWS TMR on memory performance in a vocabulary learning task in a within-subject design. Thirty-four healthy young participants (21 in the main sample and 13 in an additional sample) learned 120 Dutch-German word pairs before sleep. Participants in the main sample slept for ∼8 h during the night, while participants in the additional sample slept ∼3 h. We reactivated the Dutch words selectively during N2 and SWS in one single night. Forty words were not cued. Participants in the main sample recalled the German translations of the Dutch words after sleep in the morning, while those in the additional sample did so at 2:00 a.m. As expected, we observed no differences in recall performance between words reactivated during N2 and SWS. However, we failed to find an overall memory benefit of reactivated over nonreactivated words. Detailed time-frequency analyses showed that words played during N2 elicited stronger characteristic oscillatory responses in several frequency bands, including spindle and theta frequencies, compared with SWS. These oscillatory responses did not vary with the memory strengths of individual words. Our results question the robustness and replicability of the TMR benefit on memory using our Dutch vocabulary learning task. We discuss potential boundary conditions for vocabulary reactivation paradigms and, most importantly, see the need for further replication studies, ideally including multiple laboratories and larger sample sizes.
睡眠支持记忆巩固,特别是慢波睡眠(SWS)被认为有利于言语学习材料的巩固。在 SWS 期间,使用一种称为靶向记忆再激活(TMR)的技术重新暴露于先前学习的单词,始终对记忆有益。然而,TMR 也已成功应用于睡眠阶段 N2 期间,尽管 SWS 与 N2 期间选择性重新激活的单词之间的直接比较仍然缺失。在这里,我们在一项词汇学习任务中使用内源性设计直接比较了 N2 TMR 和 SWS TMR 对记忆表现的影响。34 名健康的年轻参与者(主样本中有 21 名,额外样本中有 13 名)在睡眠前学习了 120 对荷兰语-德语单词对。主样本中的参与者在夜间睡了约 8 小时,而额外样本中的参与者睡了约 3 小时。我们在一个晚上选择性地在 N2 和 SWS 期间重新激活荷兰语单词。有 40 个单词没有提示。主样本中的参与者在早上睡眠后回忆荷兰语单词的德语翻译,而额外样本中的参与者在凌晨 2 点回忆。正如预期的那样,我们在 N2 和 SWS 期间重新激活的单词的回忆表现没有差异。然而,我们没有发现重新激活的单词相对于非重新激活的单词的整体记忆益处。详细的时频分析表明,与 SWS 相比,在 N2 期间播放的单词在几个频带中引起了更强的特征振荡反应,包括纺锤波和 theta 频率。这些振荡反应与单个单词的记忆强度无关。我们的结果对使用我们的荷兰语词汇学习任务的 TMR 对记忆的稳健性和可复制性提出了质疑。我们讨论了词汇再激活范式的潜在边界条件,最重要的是,我们看到了需要进一步进行复制研究的必要性,理想情况下包括多个实验室和更大的样本量。