Goetz Gregor, Jeindl Reinhard, Panteli Dimitra, Busse Reinhard, Wild Claudia
HTA Austria - Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Health Care Management, Berlin Institute of Technology, Berlin, Germany.
Health Policy Technol. 2023 Sep;12(3):None. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100780.
To elaborate a concept for implementing digital health applications (DiHA), including prioritisation criteria (PC) for the Austrian context and an overview of available prioritised DiHAs.
Based on European DiHA-listings and input by Austrian experts, a categorised meta-directory of DiHAs was created. PC were developed to reflect, inter alia, the provisions of the Austrian General Insurance Act, and were applied to the meta-directory to identify DiHAs potentially relevant for the Austrian statutory health insurance. An iterative process with expert involvement was used to tailor an existing reimbursement framework to the Austrian setting.
The meta-directory comprised 132 DiHAs. Developed PC focused on plausibility (German language) and legal aspects (treatment/monitoring of chronic conditions), while other criteria (e.g. interoperability standards) were considered optional. After applying the PC, 38 DiHAs were potentially relevant in the Austrian setting. Of these, only seven supported current health record integration. Most of the prioritised DiHAs reported on CE marking (29/38) and data protection (35/38), while reporting on risk class (10/38) and technical algorithms (0/38) was sparse. For DiHA reimbursement, a four-step process is proposed: identification (ideally based on needs assessment); filtering based on PC; review of technical, regulatory and evidentiary requirements; and health technology assessment.
The proposed concept can offer guidance for policy makers (e.g., on prioritising available DiHAs) and may further foster scientific debate with regard to DiHA implementation. Further discussion on how to fully incorporate regulatory, technical, and evidentiary criteria is needed. Attention should be given to national implementation requirements, re-assessment criteria, and appropriate remuneration schemes.
阐述实施数字健康应用程序(DiHA)的概念,包括针对奥地利情况的优先排序标准(PC)以及可用的优先排序DiHA概述。
基于欧洲DiHA清单和奥地利专家的意见,创建了一个分类的DiHA元目录。制定PC以特别反映奥地利《一般保险法》的规定,并将其应用于元目录以识别与奥地利法定健康保险潜在相关的DiHA。采用专家参与的迭代过程,使现有的报销框架适应奥地利的情况。
元目录包含132个DiHA。制定的PC侧重于合理性(德语)和法律方面(慢性病的治疗/监测),而其他标准(如互操作性标准)被视为可选。应用PC后,38个DiHA在奥地利环境中可能相关。其中,只有七个支持当前的健康记录整合。大多数优先排序的DiHA报告了CE标志(29/38)和数据保护(35/38),而关于风险类别(10/38)和技术算法(0/38)的报告很少。对于DiHA报销,提出了一个四步流程:识别(理想情况下基于需求评估);基于PC进行筛选;审查技术、监管和证据要求;以及健康技术评估。
所提出的概念可为政策制定者提供指导(例如,在对可用的DiHA进行优先排序方面),并可能进一步促进关于DiHA实施的科学辩论。需要进一步讨论如何充分纳入监管、技术和证据标准。应关注国家实施要求、重新评估标准和适当的薪酬方案。