Harms Craig A, Barley Oliver R
School of Arts and Humanities, Psychology and Criminology, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Psychol Rep. 2023 Sep 21:332941231201951. doi: 10.1177/00332941231201951.
The purpose of this study was to compare the psychometric properties of two measures of alexithymia - the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ) - as well as the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale 11 measure of behavioural impulsivity because the psychometric properties of these scales have not been established in athletes. As part of a larger study, 298 participants completed an online survey that included the TAS-20, PAQ, and BIS 11, as well personal- (age and gender) and sport-specific (primary combat sport and level of competition) demographic measures. A unidimensional model was retained for the TAS-20. A unidimensional model with the possibility of multidimensional measure was retained for the PAQ, with the viability of a subscale for Generalised Externally Orientated Thinking supported. The only versions of the BIS that were retainable were unidimensional models for the BIS-15 (a 15-item version of the BIS 11) and the BIS-Brief (an 8-item version of the BIS 11). As expected, the measures of alexithymia were highly correlated. The associations between impulsivity and alexithymia as well as age and alexithymia were small in nature, with none these associations moderated by level of gender, level of competition, or primary sport for the participants. No differences in alexithymia or impulsivity according to gender, level of competition, or primary sport were noted for the participants. Implications of these findings for the measures of alexithymia - the TAS-20 and PAQ - and impulsivity - the BIS-15 and BIS-Brief - examined in the present study with athletes (as well as with other populations) are discussed.
本研究的目的是比较述情障碍的两种测量方法——多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS-20)和珀斯述情障碍问卷(PAQ)——以及行为冲动性的巴拉特冲动量表第11版测量方法,因为这些量表的心理测量特性在运动员中尚未得到确立。作为一项更大规模研究的一部分,298名参与者完成了一项在线调查,该调查包括TAS-20、PAQ和BIS 11,以及个人(年龄和性别)和特定运动(主要格斗运动和比赛水平)的人口统计学测量指标。TAS-20保留了一个单维模型。PAQ保留了一个可能进行多维测量的单维模型,支持广义外部定向思维子量表的可行性。唯一可保留的BIS版本是BIS-15(BIS 11的15项版本)和BIS-简版(BIS 11的8项版本)的单维模型。正如预期的那样,述情障碍的测量指标高度相关。冲动性与述情障碍以及年龄与述情障碍之间的关联本质上较小,对于参与者而言,这些关联均未受到性别水平、比赛水平或主要运动项目的调节。未发现参与者在述情障碍或冲动性方面存在因性别、比赛水平或主要运动项目而产生的差异。讨论了本研究中针对运动员(以及其他人群)所检验的述情障碍测量指标——TAS-20和PAQ——以及冲动性测量指标——BIS-15和BIS-简版——这些发现的意义。