• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Factors Influencing the Referral of Patients with Prediabetes to a Diabetes Prevention Program in the Bronx, New York.影响纽约布朗克斯区糖尿病前期患者转诊至糖尿病预防计划的因素。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Sep 21;20:E83. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230072.
2
The Reach of an Urban Hospital System-Based Diabetes Prevention Program: Patient Engagement and Weight Loss Characteristics.城市医院系统为基础的糖尿病预防计划的影响范围:患者参与和体重减轻特征。
Diabetes Educ. 2019 Dec;45(6):616-628. doi: 10.1177/0145721719880503. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
3
Clinical Identification and Referral of Adults With Prediabetes to a Diabetes Prevention Program.临床识别和转介成年人到糖尿病预防计划中的糖尿病前期。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Jun 27;16:E82. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180540.
4
Primary Care Cluster RCT to Increase Diabetes Prevention Program Referrals.增加糖尿病预防项目转诊的初级保健群组随机对照试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jul;59(1):79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 May 14.
5
Prevalence and Correlates of Diabetes Prevention Program Referral and Participation.糖尿病预防计划转诊和参与的流行率及相关因素。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Mar;56(3):452-457. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.10.005. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
6
Reach and Use of Diabetes Prevention Services in the United States, 2016-2017.2016-2017 年美国糖尿病预防服务的提供和使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193160. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3160.
7
Prediabetes Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices at an Academic Family Medicine Practice.在学术家庭医疗实践中,糖尿病前期知识、态度和实践。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):505-512. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180375.
8
Prevalence of and Trends in Diabetes Among Adults in the United States, 1988-2012.美国成年人糖尿病患病率及趋势(1988 年至 2012 年)。
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1021-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10029.
9
Primary Care Providers' Prediabetes Screening, Testing, and Referral Behaviors.基层医疗保健提供者的糖尿病前期筛查、检测和转介行为。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Aug;55(2):e39-e47. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
10
The role of race and ethnicity in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in four states: are there baseline disparities, and what do they mean for SCHIP?种族和族裔在四个州的儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)中的作用:是否存在基线差异,以及这些差异对儿童健康保险计划意味着什么?
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e521.

引用本文的文献

1
Virtual Diabetes Prevention Program Tailored to Increase Participation of Black and Latino Men: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.为提高黑人和拉丁裔男性参与度量身定制的虚拟糖尿病预防计划:一项随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 24;14:e64405. doi: 10.2196/64405.
2
Primary care providers' perspectives on referrals to the Diabetes Prevention Programme: a qualitative comparative study across varied referral patterns.初级保健提供者对糖尿病预防计划转诊的看法:一项针对不同转诊模式的定性比较研究
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2024 Aug 3;7(2):e000932. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2024-000932. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Using a certified electronic health record technology platform to screen, test and refer patients with prediabetes.使用经认证的电子健康记录技术平台对糖尿病前期患者进行筛查、检测和转诊。
JAMIA Open. 2021 Nov 30;4(4):ooab101. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab101. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Health Care Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices and the Association With Referrals to the National Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Change Program.卫生保健提供者的知识、态度和实践及其与向国家糖尿病预防计划生活方式改变计划转介的关联。
Am J Health Promot. 2022 Feb;36(2):236-247. doi: 10.1177/08901171211044937. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
3
Alternative Methods for Grouping Race and Ethnicity to Monitor COVID-19 Outcomes and Vaccination Coverage.用于监测 COVID-19 结局和疫苗接种覆盖情况的种族和民族分组替代方法。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Aug 13;70(32):1075-1080. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7032a2.
4
Clinic- and Community-Based National Diabetes Prevention Programs in Los Angeles.洛杉矶的基于诊所和社区的国家糖尿病预防计划。
Health Educ Behav. 2022 Aug;49(4):647-657. doi: 10.1177/10901981211016759. Epub 2021 May 29.
5
Did the 2015 USPSTF Abnormal Blood Glucose Recommendations Change Clinician Attitudes or Behaviors? A Mixed-Method Assessment.2015 年 USPSTF 异常血糖推荐意见是否改变了临床医生的态度或行为?一项混合方法评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):15-22. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06749-x. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
6
An Examination of Gender Differences in the National Diabetes Prevention Program's Lifestyle Change Program.《国家糖尿病预防计划生活方式改变项目中性别差异的研究》
Diabetes Educ. 2020 Dec;46(6):580-586. doi: 10.1177/0145721720964585. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
7
Current Perspectives on the Impact of the National Diabetes Prevention Program: Building on Successes and Overcoming Challenges.国家糖尿病预防计划影响的当前观点:基于成功经验并克服挑战
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Aug 19;13:2949-2957. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S218334. eCollection 2020.
8
Evidence and Challenges for Translation and Population Impact of the Diabetes Prevention Program.糖尿病预防计划的翻译证据和挑战及其对人群的影响。
Curr Diab Rep. 2020 Feb 20;20(3):9. doi: 10.1007/s11892-020-1293-4.
9
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: .2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断: 。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S14-S31. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S002.
10
The Reach of an Urban Hospital System-Based Diabetes Prevention Program: Patient Engagement and Weight Loss Characteristics.城市医院系统为基础的糖尿病预防计划的影响范围:患者参与和体重减轻特征。
Diabetes Educ. 2019 Dec;45(6):616-628. doi: 10.1177/0145721719880503. Epub 2019 Oct 14.

影响纽约布朗克斯区糖尿病前期患者转诊至糖尿病预防计划的因素。

Factors Influencing the Referral of Patients with Prediabetes to a Diabetes Prevention Program in the Bronx, New York.

机构信息

Institute for Clinical and Translational Research KL2 Scholars Program, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.

Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461 (

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Sep 21;20:E83. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230072.

DOI:10.5888/pcd20.230072
PMID:37733951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10516205/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Disparate engagement in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) may occur as early as the point of referral for certain subgroups, including Black and Hispanic men. We aimed to determine patient demographic and provider characteristics associated with referrals to a health system DPP in the Bronx, New York.

METHODS

Patient and health system characteristics for DPP-eligible patients seen in primary care between July 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, were obtained through the electronic health record. Generalized mixed-effects modeling was used to test the association between referral rate and clinical and sociodemographic variables.

RESULTS

Of 26,727 eligible patients, 66% were female, 46% were Hispanic, and 39% were non-Hispanic Black. Only 10% (n = 2,785) of eligible patients were referred to DPP. In the adjusted analyses, lower odds of referral were observed for men versus women (OR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.52-0.66), for non-Hispanic White versus Hispanic patients (OR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40-0.71), and for uninsured patients versus Medicaid patients (OR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.80). The odds were higher for patients in the highest versus lowest hemoglobin A1c (OR = 2.49; 95% CI, 2.27-2.72) category; for those in the highest versus lowest body mass index categories (OR = 1.61; 95% CI, 1.45-1.79); for middle-aged patients (aged 45-64 y) versus those aged 18-26 y (OR =1.63; 95% CI, 1.33-2.00); and for patients being seen by a family versus an internal medicine physician (OR = 1.65; 95% CI, 1.22-2.22).

CONCLUSION

We identified under-referral for men and highlighted other patient and health system factors associated with referral rates. Interventions to address bias in referrals and increase referrals for men at high risk for diabetes, not typically represented in DPP, are recommended.

摘要

简介

在某些亚组中,包括黑人和西班牙裔男性,参与糖尿病预防计划(DPP)的情况可能早在转诊时就存在差异。我们旨在确定与纽约布朗克斯地区卫生系统 DPP 转诊相关的患者人口统计学和提供者特征。

方法

通过电子健康记录获取 2015 年 7 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间在初级保健中就诊的符合 DPP 条件的患者的患者和卫生系统特征。使用广义混合效应模型来检验转诊率与临床和社会人口统计学变量之间的关联。

结果

在 26,727 名符合条件的患者中,66%为女性,46%为西班牙裔,39%为非西班牙裔黑人。只有 10%(n=2785)的符合条件的患者被转诊到 DPP。在调整后的分析中,与女性相比,男性转诊的可能性较低(OR=0.60;95%CI,0.52-0.66),与非西班牙裔白人相比,西班牙裔患者(OR=0.53;95%CI,0.40-0.71),与无保险患者相比,医疗补助患者(OR=0.66;95%CI,0.54-0.80)。对于血红蛋白 A1c 最高与最低类别(OR=2.49;95%CI,2.27-2.72)的患者,对于体重指数最高与最低类别(OR=1.61;95%CI,1.45-1.79)的患者,对于中年患者(45-64 岁)与 18-26 岁的患者(OR=1.63;95%CI,1.33-2.00),以及接受家庭医生与内科医生治疗的患者(OR=1.65;95%CI,1.22-2.22),其可能性更高。

结论

我们发现男性的转诊率较低,并强调了其他与转诊率相关的患者和卫生系统因素。建议采取干预措施,以解决转诊中的偏见,并增加高风险糖尿病男性的转诊率,这些男性通常不在 DPP 中。