• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健提供者对糖尿病预防计划转诊的看法:一项针对不同转诊模式的定性比较研究

Primary care providers' perspectives on referrals to the Diabetes Prevention Programme: a qualitative comparative study across varied referral patterns.

作者信息

Stephenson-Hunter Cara, Gonzalez Christopher J, Franco Stacey, Hashmi Maryam, Tisor Ochuwa, Gonzalez Cristina M

机构信息

Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.

General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2024 Aug 3;7(2):e000932. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2024-000932. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1136/bmjnph-2024-000932
PMID:39882293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11773654/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite the effectiveness of Diabetes Prevention Programmes (DPP) in reducing diabetes risk, primary care provider (PCP) referrals remain low, especially among men and racial/ethnic minorities, exacerbating their under-representation in DPPs. Understanding PCPs' perspectives on referrals is crucial for enhancing the intervention's reach and effectiveness.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study to explore PCPs' experiences, perspectives and engagement with DPP referrals, focusing on factors influencing variations in referral rates. Based on electronic record data, high and low-referring PCPs from a large integrated health system in the Bronx, NY, participated in interviews conducted between February and September 2023. Interviews were conducted and recorded on Zoom, anonymised, transcribed and analysed using the constant comparative method.

RESULTS

From 22 PCP interviews, 4 themes emerged representing factors that influenced referrals: (1) perceived barriers to the patient engagement with the DPP, including infrastructure gaps, programme accessibility issues and unmet social needs, particularly affecting low-referring PCPs; (2) perceived effectiveness of the DPP, with concerns raised about its efficacy, especially for male and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients; (3) perceived self-efficacy in referring patients, driven by knowledge gaps and limited opportunities, especially among low-referrers and (4) recommendations to facilitate and strengthen referrals, highlighting areas for PCP and patient support. The perspectives of high-referring/low-referring PCPs often differed across these themes and associated subthemes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our research illuminates the challenges PCPs face in treating prediabetic patients and factors influencing DPP referrals in underserved populations. This understanding can guide interventions to enhance equitable DPP referrals and engagement, thereby reducing diabetes risk in vulnerable populations.

摘要

引言

尽管糖尿病预防计划(DPP)在降低糖尿病风险方面具有成效,但初级保健提供者(PCP)的转诊率仍然很低,尤其是在男性以及少数种族/族裔群体中,这加剧了他们在DPP中的代表性不足。了解初级保健提供者对转诊的看法对于扩大干预措施的覆盖范围和提高其有效性至关重要。

研究设计与方法

我们进行了一项定性研究,以探讨初级保健提供者在DPP转诊方面的经历、观点和参与情况,重点关注影响转诊率差异的因素。基于电子记录数据,来自纽约布朗克斯区一个大型综合医疗系统的高转诊率和低转诊率初级保健提供者参与了2023年2月至9月期间进行的访谈。访谈在Zoom上进行并录制,匿名处理,转录后使用持续比较法进行分析。

结果

通过对22名初级保健提供者的访谈,出现了4个主题,代表了影响转诊的因素:(1)患者参与DPP的感知障碍,包括基础设施差距、项目可及性问题和未满足的社会需求,尤其影响低转诊率的初级保健提供者;(2)对DPP有效性的感知,对其疗效存在担忧,特别是对男性和社会经济弱势患者;(3)转诊患者的自我效能感,受知识差距和机会有限的影响,尤其是在低转诊率提供者中;(4)促进和加强转诊的建议,突出了初级保健提供者和患者支持的领域。在这些主题及相关子主题中,高转诊率/低转诊率初级保健提供者的观点往往存在差异。

结论

我们的研究揭示了初级保健提供者在治疗糖尿病前期患者时面临的挑战以及影响服务不足人群中DPP转诊的因素。这种理解可以指导干预措施,以提高DPP转诊的公平性和参与度,从而降低弱势群体中的糖尿病风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b13/11773654/22ed7062f602/bmjnph-7-2-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b13/11773654/ef5454177196/bmjnph-7-2-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b13/11773654/22ed7062f602/bmjnph-7-2-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b13/11773654/ef5454177196/bmjnph-7-2-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b13/11773654/22ed7062f602/bmjnph-7-2-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Primary care providers' perspectives on referrals to the Diabetes Prevention Programme: a qualitative comparative study across varied referral patterns.初级保健提供者对糖尿病预防计划转诊的看法:一项针对不同转诊模式的定性比较研究
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2024 Aug 3;7(2):e000932. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2024-000932. eCollection 2024.
2
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
3
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
4
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
5
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
6
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
7
Understanding patient pathways to Mother and Baby Units: a longitudinal retrospective service evaluation in the UK.了解患者通往母婴病房的路径:英国一项纵向回顾性服务评估
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul 16:1-17. doi: 10.3310/GDVS2427.
8
Factors Influencing Primary Care Physicians' Adjustment of Oral Anti-Diabetic Drugs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Qualitative Research Study.影响2型糖尿病患者基层医疗医生调整口服抗糖尿病药物的因素:一项定性研究
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251348973. doi: 10.1177/21501319251348973. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
Chronic disease patients' experiences with accessing health care in rural and remote areas: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.慢性病患者在农村和偏远地区获得医疗保健的经历:一项系统评价和定性元综合分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013 Sep 1;13(15):1-33. eCollection 2013.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Influencing the Referral of Patients with Prediabetes to a Diabetes Prevention Program in the Bronx, New York.影响纽约布朗克斯区糖尿病前期患者转诊至糖尿病预防计划的因素。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Sep 21;20:E83. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230072.
2
Trends and disparities in diabetes and prediabetes among adults in the United States, 1999-2018.美国成年人中糖尿病和糖尿病前期的趋势和差异。(1999-2018 年)
Public Health. 2023 Jan;214:163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.10.021. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
3
Two decades of diabetes prevention efforts: A call to innovate and revitalize our approach to lifestyle change.
20 年的糖尿病预防工作:呼吁创新和振兴我们的生活方式改变方法。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Apr;198:110195. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.110195. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
4
Engaging Payors and Primary Care Physicians Together in Improving Diabetes Prevention.使支付方和初级保健医生共同参与改善糖尿病预防。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(2):309-314. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07788-8. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
5
Barriers to participation and lifestyle change among lower versus higher income participants in the National Diabetes Prevention Program: lifestyle coach perspectives.《国家糖尿病预防计划中低收入参与者与高收入参与者在参与和生活方式改变方面的障碍:生活方式教练的观点》
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Aug 17;12(8):860-869. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac032.
6
Qualitative inquiry with primary care providers and specialists about adult weight management care and referrals.定性研究:初级保健提供者和专家对成人体重管理护理和转介的看法。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 May 25;12(4):576-584. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac006.
7
Health Care Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices and the Association With Referrals to the National Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Change Program.卫生保健提供者的知识、态度和实践及其与向国家糖尿病预防计划生活方式改变计划转介的关联。
Am J Health Promot. 2022 Feb;36(2):236-247. doi: 10.1177/08901171211044937. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
8
Screening for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.筛查糖尿病前期和 2 型糖尿病:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 Aug 24;326(8):736-743. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.12531.
9
Clinic- and Community-Based National Diabetes Prevention Programs in Los Angeles.洛杉矶的基于诊所和社区的国家糖尿病预防计划。
Health Educ Behav. 2022 Aug;49(4):647-657. doi: 10.1177/10901981211016759. Epub 2021 May 29.
10
Did the 2015 USPSTF Abnormal Blood Glucose Recommendations Change Clinician Attitudes or Behaviors? A Mixed-Method Assessment.2015 年 USPSTF 异常血糖推荐意见是否改变了临床医生的态度或行为?一项混合方法评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):15-22. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06749-x. Epub 2021 Apr 7.