• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高血压患者的共同决策和急诊科使用情况。

Shared Decision-Making and Emergency Department Use Among People With High Blood Pressure.

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri.

Saint Louis University, Department of Health Management and Policy, 3545 Lafayette Ave, St Louis, MO 63104 (

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Sep 21;20:E82. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230086.

DOI:10.5888/pcd20.230086
PMID:37733952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10516202/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Forty-seven percent of all adults in the US have a diagnosis of high blood pressure. Among all US emergency department (ED) users, an estimated 45% have high blood pressure. The success of high blood pressure interventions in reducing ED visits is partially predicated on patients' adherence to treatment plans. One method for promoting adherence to treatment plans is shared decision-making between patients and medical providers.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional observational study using 2015-2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data. We used studies on shared decision-making as a guide to create a predictor variable for shared decision-making. We determined covariates according to the Andersen Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. ED use was the outcome variable. We used cross tabulation to compare covariates of ED use and multivariable logistical regression to assess the association between shared decision-making and ED use. Our sample size was 30,407 adults.

RESULTS

Less than half (39.3%) of respondents reported a high level of shared decision-making; 23.3% had 1 or more ED visits. In the unadjusted model, respondents who reported a high level of shared decision-making were 20% less likely than those with a low level of shared decision-making to report 1 or more ED visits (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75-0.86; P <.001). After adjusting for covariates, a high level of shared decision-making was still associated with lower odds of ED use (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.97; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Shared decision-making may be an effective method for reducing ED use among patients with high blood pressure.

摘要

简介

美国 47%的成年人被诊断患有高血压。在美国所有急诊部 (ED) 用户中,估计有 45%患有高血压。高血压干预措施在减少 ED 就诊次数方面取得成功的部分原因是患者对治疗计划的依从性。促进患者对治疗计划的依从性的一种方法是患者与医疗提供者之间进行共同决策。

方法

我们使用 2015-2019 年医疗支出面板调查数据进行了一项横断面观察性研究。我们使用关于共同决策的研究作为指南,创建了一个共同决策的预测变量。我们根据安德森健康服务使用行为模型确定了协变量。ED 使用是结果变量。我们使用交叉表比较 ED 使用的协变量,并使用多变量逻辑回归评估共同决策与 ED 使用之间的关联。我们的样本量为 30407 名成年人。

结果

不到一半(39.3%)的受访者报告高水平的共同决策;23.3%的受访者有 1 次或多次 ED 就诊。在未调整模型中,报告高水平共同决策的受访者报告 1 次或多次 ED 就诊的可能性比报告低水平共同决策的受访者低 20%(优势比 [OR],0.80;95%置信区间,0.75-0.86;P <.001)。在调整协变量后,高水平的共同决策仍然与 ED 使用的可能性降低相关(OR,0.86;95%置信区间,0.76-0.97;P =.01)。

结论

共同决策可能是降低高血压患者 ED 使用的有效方法。

相似文献

1
Shared Decision-Making and Emergency Department Use Among People With High Blood Pressure.高血压患者的共同决策和急诊科使用情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Sep 21;20:E82. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230086.
2
A National Study of Outpatient Health Care Providers' Effect on Emergency Department Visit Acuity and Likelihood of Hospitalization.一项关于门诊医疗保健提供者对急诊就诊 acuity 和住院可能性影响的全国性研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;71(6):728-736. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
3
Association of shared decision-making on patient-reported health outcomes and healthcare utilization.患者报告的健康结果和医疗保健利用的共享决策的关联。
Am J Surg. 2018 Jul;216(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
Postoperative Emergency Department Visits After Urinary Stone Surgery: Variation Based on Surgical Modality.尿石症手术后急诊就诊:基于手术方式的变化。
J Endourol. 2020 Jan;34(1):93-98. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0399. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
5
Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared decision-making: a systematic review.通过共同决策让患者参与急诊科的医疗决策:系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;19(8):959-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01414.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
6
A Prospective Evaluation of Shared Decision-making Regarding Analgesics Selection for Older Emergency Department Patients With Acute Musculoskeletal Pain.老年急性肌肉骨骼疼痛急诊科患者镇痛药选择共同决策的前瞻性评估
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):306-14. doi: 10.1111/acem.12888. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
7
Emergency department visits after lumbar spine surgery are associated with lower Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores.腰椎手术后急诊就诊与较低的医疗机构患者评估系统评分相关。
Spine J. 2018 Feb;18(2):226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.043. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Unmet substance abuse treatment need, health services utilization, and cost: a population-based emergency department study.未满足的药物滥用治疗需求、医疗服务利用情况及成本:一项基于人群的急诊科研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;45(2):118-27. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.08.003.
10
Racial Disparities in Shared Decision-Making and the Use of mHealth Technology Among Adults With Hypertension in the 2017-2020 Health Information National Trends Survey: Cross-Sectional Study in the United States.种族差异在共享决策和使用移动医疗技术在高血压患者中的应用 2017-2020 年健康信息国家趋势调查:美国的横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 13;25:e47566. doi: 10.2196/47566.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision-making for pediatric acute otitis media in the United States: a randomized emergency department trial.美国小儿急性中耳炎的共同决策:一项随机急诊科试验。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Aug 2;25(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01305-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in Blood Pressure Outcomes Among Hypertensive Individuals During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Time Series Analysis in Three US Healthcare Organizations.高血压患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间血压变化结果:美国三个医疗机构的时间序列分析。
Hypertension. 2022 Dec;79(12):2733-2742. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.19861. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
2
Medicaid Expansion's Impact on Emergency Department Use by State and Payer.医疗补助扩大对州和支付方急诊使用的影响。
Value Health. 2022 Apr;25(4):630-637. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.09.014. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
3
Gender Differences in Patients' Experience of Care in the Emergency Department.急诊科患者护理体验中的性别差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(3):676-679. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06862-x. Epub 2021 May 7.
4
Application of Andersen's behavioural model of health services use: a scoping review with a focus on qualitative health services research.应用安德森健康服务利用行为模型:以定性健康服务研究为重点的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 5;11(5):e045018. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045018.
5
Hypertension Management in Emergency Departments.急诊科高血压管理。
Am J Hypertens. 2020 Oct 21;33(10):927-934. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpaa068.
6
Illness Perceptions, Self-efficacy, and Self-reported Medication Adherence in Persons Aged 50 and Older With Type 2 Diabetes.50 岁及以上 2 型糖尿病患者的疾病感知、自我效能感和自我报告的药物依从性。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021;36(4):312-328. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000675.
7
Elevated Blood Pressure in the Emergency Department: A Risk Factor for Incident Cardiovascular Disease.急诊科高血压:心血管疾病事件的危险因素。
Hypertension. 2020 Jan;75(1):229-236. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14002. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
8
Shared decision making, satisfaction with care and medication adherence among patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者的共同决策、护理满意度和药物依从性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Mar;103(3):661-669. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
9
Person-centred shared decision making.以人为本的共享决策。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1057-1062. doi: 10.1111/jep.13260. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
10
Heart Failure, Shared Decision-making, and Social Determinants of Health: An Upstream Perspective.心力衰竭、共同决策与健康的社会决定因素:上游视角
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Jul 1;4(7):609-610. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1763.