• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖析日本人和欧裔美国人社交焦虑中的文化差异:威胁评估与注意偏向的作用

"Unpacking" cultural differences in social anxiety between Japanese and European Americans: the roles of threat appraisal and attentional bias.

作者信息

Krieg Alexander, Xu Yiyuan

机构信息

Department of Global Communication, Kobe Gakuin University, Kobe, Japan.

Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 5;14:1132918. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1132918. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1132918
PMID:37736154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10509556/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cultural differences in self-reported social anxiety between people of East Asian heritage and European heritage may be related to differences in independent and interdependent self-construals, which potentially influence the processing of social threat.

METHODS

We examined the roles of two different aspects of threat bias: threat appraisal (Study 1) and attentional bias (Study 2) to explain cultural group differences in social anxiety between Japanese and European American college students.

RESULTS

Study 1 demonstrated that sequential mediations of lower independent self-construal and higher appraisal of threat among Japanese could explain their higher social anxiety compared to European Americans. However, Study 2 failed to find the relation between cultural group differences in self-construals and attentional bias. In addition, the cultural group differences in attentional bias were unexpectedly due to stronger selective attention toward neutral stimuli among European Americans, rather than bias toward social threat among Japanese. After selective attention was experimentally manipulated, there were significant cultural group differences in self-reported social anxiety and anxious behavior in a speech task.

DISCUSSION

These conflicting findings suggested that an alternative theoretical framework other than the self-construal theory might be needed to fully account for cultural differences in attentional bias in explaining cultural group differences in social anxiety.

摘要

引言

东亚裔和欧洲裔人群在自我报告的社交焦虑方面的文化差异,可能与独立型和互倚型自我建构的差异有关,这可能会影响对社会威胁的处理。

方法

我们研究了威胁偏向的两个不同方面的作用:威胁评估(研究1)和注意偏向(研究2),以解释日本和欧美大学生在社交焦虑方面的文化群体差异。

结果

研究1表明,与欧美学生相比,日本学生较低的独立自我建构和较高的威胁评估的顺序中介作用,可以解释他们较高的社交焦虑。然而,研究2未能发现自我建构的文化群体差异与注意偏向之间的关系。此外,注意偏向的文化群体差异出乎意料地是由于欧美学生对中性刺激的选择性注意更强,而不是日本学生对社会威胁的偏向。在对选择性注意进行实验操纵后,在言语任务中自我报告的社交焦虑和焦虑行为存在显著的文化群体差异。

讨论

这些相互矛盾的结果表明,可能需要一个除自我建构理论之外的替代理论框架,来充分解释在解释社交焦虑的文化群体差异时注意偏向的文化差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6711/10509556/ae624fb08e87/fpsyg-14-1132918-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6711/10509556/5e8da1e2e11f/fpsyg-14-1132918-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6711/10509556/ae624fb08e87/fpsyg-14-1132918-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6711/10509556/5e8da1e2e11f/fpsyg-14-1132918-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6711/10509556/ae624fb08e87/fpsyg-14-1132918-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
"Unpacking" cultural differences in social anxiety between Japanese and European Americans: the roles of threat appraisal and attentional bias.剖析日本人和欧裔美国人社交焦虑中的文化差异:威胁评估与注意偏向的作用
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 5;14:1132918. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1132918. eCollection 2023.
2
From self-construal to threat appraisal: Understanding cultural differences in social anxiety between Asian Americans and European Americans.从自我建构到威胁评估:理解亚裔美国人和欧洲裔美国人在社交焦虑中的文化差异。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2018 Oct;24(4):477-488. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000194. Epub 2018 May 21.
3
Do self-report measures of social anxiety reflect cultural bias or real difficulties for Asian American college students?亚裔美国大学生的社交焦虑自评量表反映了文化偏见还是真实困难?
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2011 Jan;17(1):52-58. doi: 10.1037/a0022533.
4
Assessing attentional biases with stuttering.通过口吃评估注意偏向。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Jan;51(1):84-94. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12187. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
5
Self-focused attention vs. negative attentional bias during public speech task in socially anxious individuals.社交焦虑个体在公众演讲任务中自我聚焦注意与负性注意偏向的比较。
Behav Res Ther. 2021 Jan;136:103766. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103766. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
6
Self-Construals and Social Anxiety Among Asian American College Students: Testing Emotion Suppression as a Mediator.亚裔美国大学生的自我建构与社交焦虑:检验情绪抑制作为中介变量
Asian Am J Psychol. 2011 Mar;2(1):39-50. doi: 10.1037/a0023183.
7
Sources of ethnic differences between Asian American and white American college students on measures of depression and social anxiety.亚裔美国大学生和美国白人大学生在抑郁和社交焦虑测量方面存在种族差异的原因。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1997 Feb;106(1):52-60. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.106.1.52.
8
Anxiety and speaking in people who stutter: an investigation using the emotional Stroop task.口吃者的焦虑与言语表达:一项运用情绪斯特鲁普任务的调查
J Fluency Disord. 2014 Jun;40:44-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
9
It takes two to mimic: behavioral consequences of self-construals.模仿需要两个人:自我建构的行为后果。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 May;84(5):1093-102. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1093.
10
Attentional Bias in Youth With Clinical Anxiety: The Moderating Effect of Age.患有临床焦虑症的青少年的注意偏向:年龄的调节作用。
J Cogn Psychother. 2015;29(3):185-196. doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.29.3.185. Epub 2015 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Electrocortical signatures of attentional bias toward subliminal and supraliminal socially negative words in social anxiety.社交焦虑中对阈下和阈上社会负面词汇注意偏向的脑电特征
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 13;16:1506516. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1506516. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A Contextual Behavioral Account of Culture: Example Implementation of a Functional Behavioral Approach to the Study of Cultural Differences in Social Anxiety.文化的情境行为视角:一种功能性行为方法在社交焦虑文化差异研究中的实例应用
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 10;11:418. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00418. eCollection 2020.
2
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Attention Bias Modification Treatment in Youth With Treatment-Resistant Anxiety Disorders.一项针对治疗抵抗性焦虑障碍青少年的注意偏向修正治疗的随机对照试验。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;59(1):157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.02.018. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
3
From self-construal to threat appraisal: Understanding cultural differences in social anxiety between Asian Americans and European Americans.
从自我建构到威胁评估:理解亚裔美国人和欧洲裔美国人在社交焦虑中的文化差异。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2018 Oct;24(4):477-488. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000194. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Temporal Changes in Individualism and Their Ramification in Japan: Rising Individualism and Conflicts with Persisting Collectivism.日本个人主义的时代变迁及其影响:个人主义抬头与传统集体主义的冲突
Front Psychol. 2017 May 23;8:695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00695. eCollection 2017.
5
Comparing Social Anxiety Between Asian Americans and European Americans: An Examination of Measurement Invariance.比较亚裔美国人和欧洲裔美国人的社交焦虑:测量不变性的检验。
Assessment. 2018 Jul;25(5):564-577. doi: 10.1177/1073191116656438. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
6
The aetiology and maintenance of social anxiety disorder: A synthesis of complimentary theoretical models and formulation of a new integrated model.社交焦虑障碍的病因及维持因素:互补理论模型的综合与新整合模型的构建
J Affect Disord. 2016 Oct;203:84-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.069. Epub 2016 May 31.
7
Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) Analyses of Cross-Cultural Data: Practical and Theoretical Issues.跨文化数据的均值与协方差结构(MACS)分析:实践与理论问题
Multivariate Behav Res. 1997 Jan 1;32(1):53-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3.
8
Anger fosters action. Fast responses in a motor task involving approach movements toward angry faces and bodies.愤怒促进行动。在一项涉及朝着愤怒的面部和身体做出趋近动作的运动任务中会有快速反应。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 3;6:1240. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01240. eCollection 2015.
9
The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) and the Social Phobia Scale (SPS): a comparison of two short-form versions.社交互动焦虑量表(SIAS)与社交恐惧症量表(SPS):两种简版的比较
Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec;26(4):1281-1291. doi: 10.1037/a0037313. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
10
Perceiving emotions in neutral faces: expression processing is biased by affective person knowledge.在中性面孔中感知情绪:表情加工受个体情感知识的影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Apr;10(4):531-6. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu088. Epub 2014 Jun 18.