• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Perception of the Accreditation of the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment at Different Health Colleges in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯吉达不同健康学院对国家学术认证与评估委员会认证的认知
Cureus. 2023 Aug 21;15(8):e43871. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43871. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Academic accreditation process: experience of a medical college in saudi arabia.学术认证过程:沙特阿拉伯一所医学院的经验
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2012 Jan;6(1):23-9. doi: 10.12816/0005970.
3
Perceived stress among staff in Saudi Arabian dental colleges before and after an accreditation process: A cross-sectional study.沙特阿拉伯牙科学院员工在认证过程前后的感知压力:一项横断面研究。
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Feb 6;12(4):758-765. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i4.758.
4
Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward seasonal influenza vaccine during the COVID-19 pandemic among students at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences-Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王健康科学大学学生在新冠疫情期间对季节性流感疫苗的知识、态度和实践情况
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Jan 31;12:17. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_722_22. eCollection 2023.
5
Awareness, Self-Use, Perceptions, Beliefs, and Attitudes toward Complementary and Alternative Medicines (CAM) among Health Professional Students in King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王健康科学大学健康专业学生对补充和替代医学(CAM)的认知、自我使用情况、看法、信念及态度
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Apr 21;2020:7872819. doi: 10.1155/2020/7872819. eCollection 2020.
6
Sustainable Program Assessment Practices: A Review of the ABET and NCAAA Computer Information Systems Accreditation Process.可持续项目评估实践:对 ABET 和 NCAAA 计算机信息系统认证过程的回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 2;18(23):12691. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312691.
7
An Assessment of Knowledge and Awareness Regarding Ozone Dentistry Among Dental Students at King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯王国利雅得市阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王健康科学大学牙科专业学生对臭氧牙科的知识与认知评估。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 14;15(11):e48784. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48784. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
Knowledge and information sources on standard precautions and infection control of health sciences students at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Saudi Arabia, Riyadh.沙特阿拉伯利雅得的沙特国王阿卜杜勒阿齐兹大学卫生科学学院卫生科学专业学生的标准预防措施和感染控制知识与信息来源。
J Infect Public Health. 2018 Jul-Aug;11(4):546-549. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Nov 12.
9
The Job Demands in Predicting Burnout During COVID-19 Among Teaching Faculty at KSAU-HS, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯吉达国王沙特大学健康科学学院教师在新冠疫情期间职业倦怠预测中的工作需求
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Aug 22;13:913-926. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S367776. eCollection 2022.
10
Commitment towards a better future for medical education in Saudi Arabia: the efforts of the college of medicine at Qassim University to become socially accountable.致力于沙特阿拉伯医学教育的美好未来:卡塞姆大学医学院努力承担社会责任。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1710328. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1710328.

引用本文的文献

1
AHP-MOORA framework for longitudinal evaluation of Pharm.D program learning outcomes: a tool for Saudi pharmacy programs accreditation and curriculum enhancement.用于药学博士项目学习成果纵向评估的AHP-MOORA框架:沙特药学项目认证和课程改进的工具
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 6;12:1628510. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1628510. eCollection 2025.
2
Perceived effects of accreditation on education quality and health-related job outcomes: scales validation and correlates in Lebanon.认证对教育质量和健康相关工作成果的感知影响:黎巴嫩的量表验证及相关因素
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):886. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07448-5.
3
Voices on academic accreditation: lived experiences of nurse educators, administrators, students, and alumni in nursing education.学术认证之声:护理教育中护士教育工作者、管理人员、学生及校友的亲身经历
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 14;25(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06657-2.
4
Challenges and potential improvements in the Accreditation Standards of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019 (ASK2019) derived through meta-evaluation: a cross-sectional study.2019 年韩国医学教育与评估研究所认证标准(ASK2019)通过元评估得出的挑战和潜在改进:一项横断面研究。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024;21:8. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.8. Epub 2024 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Doctors or technicians: assessing quality of medical education.医生或技术人员:评估医学教育质量。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2010 Sep 30;1:25-9. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S13877. Print 2010.
2
Accreditation and culture of quality in medical schools in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯医学院的认证和质量文化。
Med Teach. 2013;35 Suppl 1:S8-14. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.765544.
3
Academic accreditation process: experience of a medical college in saudi arabia.学术认证过程:沙特阿拉伯一所医学院的经验
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2012 Jan;6(1):23-9. doi: 10.12816/0005970.
4
The attitude of health care professionals towards accreditation: A systematic review of the literature.医疗保健专业人员对认证的态度:文献系统综述
J Family Community Med. 2012 May;19(2):74-80. doi: 10.4103/2230-8229.98281.
5
Accreditation of medical schools: the question of purpose and outcomes.医学院校认证:目的与结果问题
Med J Malaysia. 2005 Aug;60 Suppl D:35-40.
6
Accreditation of medical training in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰医学培训的认证。
Med J Malaysia. 2005 Aug;60 Suppl D:20-3.
7
Ensuring global standards for medical graduates: a pilot study of international standard-setting.确保医学毕业生的全球标准:一项国际标准制定的试点研究。
Med Teach. 2005 May;27(3):207-13. doi: 10.1080/01421590500129571.
8
Allied health deans' and program directors' perspectives of specialized accreditation effectiveness and reform.联合健康专业学院院长及项目主任对专业认证有效性与改革的看法。
J Allied Health. 2004 Winter;33(4):247-54.

沙特阿拉伯吉达不同健康学院对国家学术认证与评估委员会认证的认知

Perception of the Accreditation of the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment at Different Health Colleges in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

作者信息

Al-Shareef Ali S, AlQurashi Mansour A, Al Jabarti Azza, Alnajjar Hend, Alanazi Ahmad A, Almoamary Mohamed, Shirah Bader, Alqarni Khalid

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, SAU.

Research Office, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Aug 21;15(8):e43871. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43871. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.43871
PMID:37736446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10511272/
Abstract

Introduction Following the guidelines for maintaining quality set forth by the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA) accreditation procedure, Saudi higher education institutions, including health sciences colleges, must adhere to these guidelines. This study aims to assess the perception of personnel involved in NCAAA accreditation processes about the purpose, process, motivation, and level of involvement in the NCAAA accreditation at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS). Methods The study was conducted at KSAU-HS, Jeddah. The participants included 15 administrators and 32 faculties from the College of Medicine, College of Applied Medical Sciences, and College of Nursing with experience in the NCAAA process. A questionnaire was used to determine how motivated and involved people feel about the accreditation process. Data were examined statistically with SPSS (Version 23; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), and descriptive statistics were used. Results Forty-seven participants (23 men, 24 women, ages 36 to 55) took part in the study, of which 68% were faculty members and 32% were administrators with a variety of skill sets from the three colleges. Most participants displayed a positive attitude toward the NCAAA accreditation's motive and level of commitment. Conclusions Most of the participants in the current study contended with the NCAAA process and deemed it substantial long-term improvements.

摘要

引言 根据国家学术认证与评估委员会(NCAAA)认证程序所规定的质量维护指南,沙特的高等教育机构,包括健康科学学院,必须遵守这些指南。本研究旨在评估参与NCAAA认证过程的人员对沙特国王阿卜杜勒阿齐兹健康科学大学(KSAU-HS)NCAAA认证的目的、过程、动机和参与程度的看法。方法 该研究在吉达的KSAU-HS进行。参与者包括来自医学院、应用医学科学学院和护理学院的15名管理人员和32名教师,他们都有NCAAA认证过程的相关经验。使用问卷调查来确定人们对认证过程的积极性和参与度。数据用SPSS(版本23;IBM公司,美国纽约州阿蒙克)进行统计学检验,并采用描述性统计方法。结果 47名参与者(23名男性,24名女性,年龄在36至55岁之间)参与了该研究,其中68%是教师,32%是管理人员,他们来自三所学院,具备各种技能。大多数参与者对NCAAA认证的动机和投入程度持积极态度。结论 本研究中的大多数参与者认同NCAAA认证过程,并认为它能带来长期的显著改善。