Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Trisaia Research Centre, 75026 Rotondella, Matera, Italy.
Department of Computer Engineering, Modeling, Electronics and Systems (DIMES), University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy.
Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2023 Jul 7;15(3):17. doi: 10.31083/j.fbe1503017.
Globally, the growing production of food commodities generates significant quantities of agroindustrial residues, most of which are untreated and disposed of as waste through either burning, dumping into the land, or unplanned landfilling, thereby causing environmental pollution, public health problems, and decreased soil organic matter and soil productivity. A literature review has been conducted on the current crop residue biomass valorization, analyzing raw material properties and the potential risks associated with its incorrect or absent management, as well as the major microbial fermentation strategies that are used for converting residual crops into valuable products. Approximately 2445.2 million tons of crop residues are produced worldwide. Microbial fermentation is an efficient way of managing residues that are rich in nutrients (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) and converting them into single-cell proteins, antibiotics, enzymes, bioalcohols, polysaccharides, fine chemicals, and others, thereby supporting a circular bioeconomy. Although separate saccharification and fermentation (SHF) represent the predominant fermentation strategy, it requires considerable equipment costs and a long process time, which can lead to the formation of contaminations and inhibitors. Alternative conversion strategies, including simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF), and consolidated bioprocessing (CBP), can reduce time and production costs, contaminations, and inhibitor formation, and enhance process yields. Nevertheless, combining hydrolysis and fermentation into a single phase results in non-optimal temperature and pH. This review discusses crop residue valorization through fermentation strategies, and provides a 360-degree view of the topic. After investigating the major types of crop residues and the potential environmental risks associated with their incorrect or absent management, it analyzes the key steps in the crop residue bioconversion process, and the most common microorganisms and microbial cultures. In addition, this review reports on various examples of crop residues being converted into industrial products and analyzes the main fermentation strategies (SHF, SSF, SSCF, and CBP), highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. As a matter of fact, fermentation strategies need to be compared for their benefits and disadvantages before being implemented on a large scale. In addition, the properties and availability of the raw materials, investment, and operating costs, the skilled workforce availability, sustainability, and the return on investment all need to be evaluated. Finally, the discussion focus on future outlooks and challenges.
全球范围内,粮食生产的增长产生了大量的农业工业废料,其中大部分未经处理,通过燃烧、倾倒或无计划的填埋等方式作为废物处理,从而造成环境污染、公共卫生问题,并导致土壤有机质和土壤生产力下降。本文对当前作物残余生物质的增值利用进行了文献综述,分析了原材料特性以及其管理不善所带来的潜在风险,以及用于将残余作物转化为有价值产品的主要微生物发酵策略。全球约有 2.4452 亿吨作物残余物。微生物发酵是一种有效的管理方式,可利用富含营养物质(如氮、磷和钾)的残余物,并将其转化为单细胞蛋白、抗生素、酶、生物醇、多糖、精细化学品等,从而支持循环生物经济。虽然单独糖化和发酵(SHF)代表了主要的发酵策略,但它需要大量的设备成本和较长的工艺时间,这可能导致污染物和抑制剂的形成。替代转化策略,包括同步糖化和发酵(SSF)、同步糖化和共发酵(SSCF)和整合生物加工(CBP),可以减少时间和生产成本、污染物和抑制剂的形成,并提高工艺产率。然而,将水解和发酵结合到一个单相中会导致非最佳的温度和 pH 值。本文讨论了通过发酵策略对作物残余物的增值利用,并从 360 度的视角对该主题进行了探讨。在研究了主要类型的作物残余物以及其管理不善所带来的潜在环境风险之后,分析了作物残余物生物转化过程的关键步骤,以及最常见的微生物和微生物培养物。此外,本文还报告了各种将作物残余物转化为工业产品的实例,并分析了主要的发酵策略(SHF、SSF、SSCF 和 CBP),强调了它们的优缺点。事实上,在大规模实施之前,需要对发酵策略进行比较,以评估其优缺点。此外,还需要评估原材料的特性和可用性、投资和运营成本、熟练劳动力的可用性、可持续性和投资回报。最后,讨论的重点是未来的展望和挑战。