• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定国家实施策略,以加快在美国癌症中心采用基于证据的家庭护理人员支持。

Developing a national implementation strategy to accelerate uptake of evidence-based family caregiver support in U.S. cancer centers.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, UAB Department of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2024 Jan;33(1):e6221. doi: 10.1002/pon.6221. Epub 2023 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1002/pon.6221
PMID:37743780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10896495/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Characterize key factors and training needs of U.S. cancer centers in implementing family caregiver support services.

METHODS

Sequential explanatory mixed methods design consisting of: (1) a national survey of clinicians and administrators from Commission-on-Cancer-accredited cancer centers (N = 238) on factors and training needed for establishing new caregiver programs and (2) qualitative interviews with a subsample of survey respondents (N = 30) to elicit feedback on survey findings and the outline of an implementation strategy to facilitate implementation of evidence-based family caregiver support (the Caregiver Support Accelerator). Survey data was tabulated using descriptive statistics and transcribed interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Top factors for developing new caregiver programs were that the program be: consistent with the cancer center's mission and strategic plan (87%), supported by clinic leadership (86.5%) and providers and staff (85.7%), and low cost or cost effective (84.9%). Top training needs were how to: train staff to implement programs (72.3%), obtain program materials (63.0%), and evaluate program outcomes (62.6%). Only 3.8% reported that no training was needed. Qualitative interviews yielded four main themes: (1) gaining leadership, clinician, and staff buy-in and support is essential; (2) cost and clinician burden are major factors to program implementation; (3) training should help with adapting and marketing programs to local context and culture; and (4) the Accelerator strategy is comprehensive and would benefit from key organizational partnerships and policy standards.

CONCLUSION

Findings will be used to inform and refine the Accelerator implementation strategy to facilitate the adoption and growth of evidence-based cancer caregiver support in U.S. cancer centers.

摘要

目的

描述美国癌症中心实施家庭护理人员支持服务的关键因素和培训需求。

方法

采用序贯解释性混合方法设计,包括:(1)对美国癌症委员会认证癌症中心的临床医生和管理人员进行全国调查(N=238),了解建立新的护理人员计划所需的因素和培训;(2)对调查受访者的一个子样本进行定性访谈(N=30),以了解对调查结果和实施策略大纲的反馈,该策略大纲旨在促进基于证据的家庭护理人员支持的实施(护理人员支持加速器)。使用描述性统计对调查数据进行制表,使用主题分析对转录访谈进行分析。

结果

制定新的护理人员计划的首要因素是该计划要与癌症中心的使命和战略计划保持一致(87%),得到临床领导(86.5%)和医务人员及工作人员(85.7%)的支持,且具有成本效益(84.9%)。培训的首要需求是如何培训员工以实施计划(72.3%),获取计划材料(63.0%)以及评估计划结果(62.6%)。只有 3.8%的人表示不需要培训。定性访谈产生了四个主要主题:(1)获得领导层、临床医生和员工的认可和支持至关重要;(2)成本和临床医生的负担是计划实施的主要因素;(3)培训应帮助适应和推广计划以适应当地的背景和文化;(4)加速器策略全面,将受益于关键的组织合作关系和政策标准。

结论

调查结果将用于为加速器实施策略提供信息并进行改进,以促进美国癌症中心采用和推广基于证据的癌症护理人员支持。

相似文献

1
Developing a national implementation strategy to accelerate uptake of evidence-based family caregiver support in U.S. cancer centers.制定国家实施策略,以加快在美国癌症中心采用基于证据的家庭护理人员支持。
Psychooncology. 2024 Jan;33(1):e6221. doi: 10.1002/pon.6221. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
2
Availability of Family Caregiver Programs in US Cancer Centers.美国癌症中心的家庭护理计划的可用性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2337250. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37250.
3
Improving Uptake of a National Web-Based Psychoeducational Workshop for Informal Caregivers of Veterans: Mixed Methods Implementation Evaluation.提高退伍军人非正式照护者参与国家网络心理教育工作坊的人数:混合方法实施评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):e16495. doi: 10.2196/16495.
4
Operationalizing Leadership and Clinician Buy-In to Implement Evidence-Based Tobacco Treatment Programs in Routine Oncology Care: A Mixed-Method Study of the U.S. Cancer Center Cessation Initiative.将领导力和临床医生的认同付诸实践,以在常规肿瘤学护理中实施基于证据的烟草治疗计划:美国癌症中心戒烟倡议的混合方法研究。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 29;29(4):2406-2421. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29040195.
5
Implementation intensification to disseminate a skills-based caregiver training program: protocol for a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial.强化实施以推广基于技能的护理人员培训项目:一项III型有效性-实施混合试验方案
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Aug 16;4(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00475-7.
6
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
7
Implementation of a Statewide Web-Based Caregiver Resource Information System (CareNav): Mixed Methods Study.全州基于网络的护理人员资源信息系统(CareNav)的实施:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 13;6(7):e38735. doi: 10.2196/38735.
8
Implementing Caregiver Support Programs in a Regional Stroke System.在区域脑卒中系统中实施照护者支持计划。
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):3585-3591. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026660. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
9
10
Caregiver burden among family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer in a palliative context: A mixed-method study.姑息治疗背景下晚期癌症患者家庭照顾者的照顾负担:一项混合方法研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Nov;32(21-22):7751-7764. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16872. Epub 2023 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the needs of family caregivers of patients attending an outpatient palliative care clinic: an explanatory sequential mixed methods pilot study.评估门诊姑息治疗诊所患者家庭照顾者的需求:一项解释性序列混合方法试点研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 29;33(9):819. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09890-z.
2
Longitudinal Dyadic Analysis of Psychosocial and Health Outcomes in Black Breast Cancer Patients and Their Informal Caregivers.黑人乳腺癌患者及其非正式照料者心理社会和健康结局的纵向二元分析
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251362950. doi: 10.1177/10732748251362950. Epub 2025 Aug 6.
3
Development of a Mobile App to Support Head and Neck Cancer Caregiving: Mixed Methods Study.开发一款支持头颈癌护理的移动应用程序:混合方法研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jun 10;11:e66471. doi: 10.2196/66471.
4
Feasibility and Acceptability of Collecting Passive Smartphone Data for Potential Use in Digital Phenotyping Among Family Caregivers and Patients With Advanced Cancer.收集被动式智能手机数据用于晚期癌症家庭照顾者和患者数字表型分析的可行性和可接受性
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Jan;9:e2400201. doi: 10.1200/CCI-24-00201. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
5
Insights About Dyadic Cancer Survivorship Interventions for Black Women and Their Caregivers: A Rapid Qualitative Analysis of Collaborator Perspectives.关于黑人女性及其照顾者的二元癌症幸存者干预措施的见解:对合作者观点的快速定性分析
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241305583. doi: 10.1177/10732748241305583.
6
Breadth and Depth of Patient and Caregiver Supportive Services in Community Oncology (WF-1803CD).社区肿瘤学中患者及护理者支持性服务的广度与深度(WF - 1803CD)
Psychooncology. 2024 Dec;33(12):e70034. doi: 10.1002/pon.70034.
7
The Importance of Honoring Family Caregiver Burden: Challenges in Mental Health Care Delivery.重视家庭照顾者负担的重要性:心理健康护理提供中的挑战。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2025 Jun;32(2):193-201. doi: 10.1007/s10880-024-10051-3. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
8
Building on and tailoring to: Adapting a cancer caregiver psychoeducational intervention for rural settings.基于并调整:为农村环境调整癌症护理者心理教育干预措施。
Cancer Med. 2024 Sep;13(17):e70187. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70187.

本文引用的文献

1
Availability of Family Caregiver Programs in US Cancer Centers.美国癌症中心的家庭护理计划的可用性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2337250. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37250.
2
Fit for Duty: Lessons Learned from Outpatient and Homebound Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation to Prepare Family Caregivers for Home-Based Care.胜任工作:从门诊和居家造血细胞移植中吸取的经验教训,使家庭照护者为居家护理做好准备。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Mar;29(3):143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.12.014. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
3
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
4
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.定性研究中饱和度的样本量:实证检验的系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
5
The Challenges of Enrollment and Retention: A Systematic Review of Psychosocial Behavioral Interventions for Patients With Cancer and Their Family Caregivers.纳入和保留的挑战:癌症患者及其家庭照顾者的心理社会行为干预的系统评价。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Sep;62(3):e279-e304. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.04.019. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
6
Caregiver engagement practices in National Cancer Institute Clinical Oncology Research Program settings: Implications for research to advance the field.国家癌症研究所临床肿瘤学研究计划环境中的照护者参与实践:对推进该领域研究的启示。
Cancer. 2021 Feb 15;127(4):639-647. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33296. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
7
Individual, health system, and contextual barriers and facilitators for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic metareview.个体、医疗体系及具体环境因素对临床实践指南实施的阻碍与促进作用:系统元分析
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jun 29;18(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00588-8.
8
State of palliative care services at US cancer centers: An updated national survey.美国癌症中心姑息治疗服务状况:最新全国调查。
Cancer. 2020 Jan 1;126(9):2013-2023. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32738. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
9
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer.针对癌症患者非正式照护者的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD009912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009912.pub2.
10
Association between dyadic interventions and outcomes in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.**对偶干预与癌症患者结局的关联:一项荟萃分析**。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Mar;27(3):745-761. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4556-8. Epub 2019 Jan 2.