Suppr超能文献

对美国公众向美国农业部提交的关于细胞培养肉标签的意见书的评估。

Evaluation of public submissions to the USDA for labeling of cell-cultured meat in the United States.

作者信息

Failla Morgan, Hopfer Helene, Wee Josephine

机构信息

Department of Food Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2023 Sep 8;10:1197111. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1197111. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of cell-cultured meat processing technologies and regulations, commercialization of cell-cultured meat to market shelves requires the implementation of labeling that informs and protects consumers while ensuring economic competitiveness. In November 2022, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) completed its first pre-market consultation of cell-cultured meat and did not question the safety of these products for human consumption. As of June 2023, commercialization of cell-cultured meat products has become a reality in the United States. To derive potential label terms and gain insight into how different stakeholders refer to these novel products, we analyzed 1,151 comments submitted to the 2021 U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Services (USDA-FSIS) call on the labeling of cell-cultured meat and poultry. Our first aim was to systematically assess the nature of comments with regards to their length, cited references, and supplemental materials. In addition, we aimed to identify the most used terms to refer to these products through text analysis. We also asked how these analyses would vary by affiliation category and economic interest. Using the listed organizations for each comment, we first determined financial ties: 77 (7%) comments came from those with an economic interest, 12 (1%) of the comments did not have an identifiable economic interest, while for the remaining 1,062 (92%) comments economic interest could not be determined. We then grouped comments into affiliation categories. Cell-cultured meat companies and animal welfare non-profits had the highest median word count, whereas comments from the unknown affiliation category had the lowest. We found across all comments the predominantly mentioned potential label terms, in descending order, to be . While all label terms were discussed throughout overall submissions, percentages of comments mentioning each term differed between affiliation categories. Our findings suggest differences in how affiliation categories are discussing cell-cultured meat products for the US market. As a next step, the perception and acceptance of these terms must be evaluated to identify the optimal label term regarding the information and protection provided to consumers while ensuring economic competitiveness.

摘要

随着细胞培养肉加工技术和法规的迅速发展,细胞培养肉要实现商业化并上架销售,就需要实施标签标注,既要为消费者提供信息并保护他们,又要确保其经济竞争力。2022年11月,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)完成了对细胞培养肉的首次上市前咨询,并未质疑这些产品供人类食用的安全性。截至2023年6月,细胞培养肉产品在美国已实现商业化。为了得出潜在的标签术语,并深入了解不同利益相关者如何称呼这些新产品,我们分析了提交给美国农业部食品安全与检验局(USDA-FSIS)2021年关于细胞培养肉和禽肉标签标注征求意见的1151条评论。我们的首要目标是系统评估评论的性质,包括评论长度、引用文献和补充材料。此外,我们旨在通过文本分析确定提及这些产品最常用的术语。我们还研究了这些分析在所属类别和经济利益方面会如何不同。利用每条评论列出的组织,我们首先确定了经济关系:77条(7%)评论来自有经济利益的一方,12条(1%)评论没有可识别的经济利益,而其余1062条(92%)评论的经济利益无法确定。然后我们将评论按所属类别进行分组。细胞培养肉公司和动物福利非营利组织的评论中位数字数最多,而未知所属类别的评论中位数字数最少。我们发现在所有评论中,主要提及的潜在标签术语按降序排列为……虽然在所有提交的评论中都讨论了所有标签术语,但提及每个术语的评论百分比在不同所属类别之间存在差异。我们的研究结果表明,不同所属类别在讨论美国市场的细胞培养肉产品时存在差异。下一步,必须评估这些术语的认知度和接受度,以确定在确保经济竞争力的同时,为消费者提供信息和保护的最佳标签术语。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/736a/10514362/2d8f9e0b504d/fnut-10-1197111-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验